 |
 |
Calling all Linear Algebra experts...
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
So I have a problem in the textbook that is notated funny, I was wondering if someone in here knew how to solve it...
Find the orthogonal complement of W and give a basis for the orthogonal compliment:
W = {[x y] : 2x -y = 0}
(x and y are in the same column, but that's kind of hard to type...)
The book doesn't demonstrate how to do the problem when phrased in this form. I thought maybe I could turn it into the vector [2 1] but I don't feel like that's taking me down the right path.
Anyone?
|
|
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Jose, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Over 13 years since I did anything like that...wish I could help. I kind of liked doing that stuff back at school.
Steve
|
|
Celebrating 10 years and 4000 posts on MacNN!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Orthogonal means perpendicular. So my assumption is that's just asking for the set of lines perpendicular to 2x - y = 0. That set would happen to be x + 2y = a, where a is any real number.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Ghoser777
Orthogonal means perpendicular. So my assumption is that's just asking for the set of lines perpendicular to 2x - y = 0. That set would happen to be x + 2y = a, where a is any real number.
The book gives x + 2y = 0 as the answer, so you're right.
This is going to be a really dumb question, as I'm pretty bad at picking this stuff up, but what methodology did you go through to get the orthogonal function?
In addition, the book gives the answer for the basis as [-2 1], which I can't figure out how it came up with.
Sorry, I just don't pick up this stuff well...
|
|
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I cheated. I haven't taken linear algebra in a long time, but I know how to find a line perpendicular to another line. In the two dimensional case, you just need the slope's to be opposite recipricols. If you solve your first equation for y, you'll get y = 2x. (slope is 2). If you solve the answer for y, you'll get y = (-1/2x). (slope of -1/2).
Now, the correct way to do it is probably to use the dot product (I have no idea how far you are in your class). The dot product of two vectors is defined as the sum of the products of the corresponding parts of two vectors. i.e.
[a b] dot [c d] = ac + bd.
You have the vector [2 -1] as your given equation. If you dot that vector with another vector [a b], the sum has to be 0 for the vectors to be perpendicular. There are infinitely many vectors that will satisfy that property, but the simplest one is [-1 2].
I haven't taken linear algebra in a long time, so there probably is another way to do this.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh yeah, and the dot product is the same thing as the inner product (of that was confusing you - it's a different name for the same thing).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|