Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland

Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland
Thread Tools
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 12:20 AM
 
Wired has a trailer for it. The visuals are pretty damn cool.

First Look: New Alice in Wonderland Trailer | Underwire | Wired.com
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 12:29 AM
 
Yeah, looks great.

-t
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 12:56 AM
 
Apple has the trailer too, including in 1080p. I've been admiring it - looks pretty good.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 02:55 AM
 
I am SO there. I missed Coraline 3D in the theater, but I am not going to miss this.

"This film has been approved for... appropriate audiences", and a Disney film. Does that mean that Disney gave Burton all the freedom he needed to produce the kickbutt movie he always produces?

Also, is Johnny Depp positioning himself to become the next Batman's Joker?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Punta Cana, República Dominicana
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 10:03 AM
 
It's visually stunning. I'm hoping it has substance as well. Can't really tell from the trailer.
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 11:26 AM
 
Originally Posted by The Godfather View Post
"This film has been approved for... appropriate audiences", and a Disney film. Does that mean that Disney gave Burton all the freedom he needed to produce the kickbutt movie he always produces?
Heh, I was thinking almost exactly the same thing. Hoping that the "Tim Burton" part will win out over the "Disney" part. Having huge Narnia battles go down without a drop of blood anywhere is just lame.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 11:38 AM
 
Originally Posted by reader50 View Post
Apple has the trailer too, including in 1080p. I've been admiring it - looks pretty good.
... and creepy. Sweeney Todd Redux creepy. I guess they wanted the hatter to look like someone with mercury poisoning. Wow.
He can be fixed -- you can't.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The decaying ruins of Old New York
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 05:05 PM
 
I imagine it will be fairly creepy. But that's Tim Burton's style.
For all the trash I talk, I sure own a lot of Macs...
Clamshell iBook Mod Community
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 05:22 PM
 
Didn't Johnny Depp say from now on he only wants to make movies his little kids can watch? I hope it doesn't do to him what it did to Eddie Murphy. Based on the trailer, this film looks like it will be something of a telltale, could be creepy in an awesome way or in a boring corny way.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 05:58 PM
 
Surely Edward Scissorhands and Sweeney Todd were not kiddy movies.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 06:15 PM
 
Awww yeeaah. This looks dark and sweet and all things Burton. We saw Coraline 3D in the theatre, good show. I think the story here has a little more substance to work with. This should not disappoint.
ebuddy
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 07:54 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Godfather View Post
Surely Edward Scissorhands and Sweeney Todd were not kiddy movies.
This was around 2004, so long after Scissorhands. I never saw Sweeney Todd... maybe Depp was full of it, or maybe I am. I heard this in a radio interview, but I can't find reference to it now. Maybe I misheard him.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2009, 10:06 PM
 
Coraline was not Tim Burton's, but Henry Selick's. He directed Nightmare Before Christmas, which was created by Tim Burton.

Sweeney Todd is likely to become a cult classic, not a best seller.
     
Administrator
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 03:03 AM
 
New trailer up. It still looks interesting. Seems to me Burton has darkened it a bit since the teaser.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 05:32 AM
 
It's your screen brightness, you can adjust this in System Preferences / Displays
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: We come from the land of the ice and snow...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 09:21 AM
 
Hmm. Intrigued.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 10:12 AM
 
Originally Posted by reader50 View Post
New trailer up. It still looks interesting. Seems to me Burton has darkened it a bit since the teaser.
W0W?!?

That looks awesome. I do like the darker "feel" to it. Everything seems to be tinged with a hint of malevolence, and that the story will not be full of simple, cheerful, positivisms. And I like the fact Alice is shown as an active participant in her own story. The Disney versions always portrayed Alice as a wide-eyed ingenue, simply being carried along by the forces at work around her. This version shows Alice as having a lot of personal agency and a controlling aspect in deciding her own fate.
One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 10:29 AM
 
Well, Alice has been aged by like 10 years. In the original story, she's supposed to be a girl, not a woman old enough that I might pick her up at a bar one of these days.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 10:49 AM
 
Originally Posted by The Godfather View Post
"This film has been approved for... appropriate audiences", and a Disney film. Does that mean that Disney gave Burton all the freedom he needed to produce the kickbutt movie he always produces?
Why would he need Disney's approval to make a film about a book older than Disney?
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Urbandale, IA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 11:06 AM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
Well, Alice has been aged by like 10 years. In the original story, she's supposed to be a girl, not a woman old enough that I might pick her up at a bar one of these days.
The description text says that Alice "returns to the whimsical world she first encountered as a young girl […] embark[ing] on a fantastical journey to find her true destiny and end the Red Queen’s reign of terror."

So it's kind of a sequel, only without the original movie (unless it's supposed to be a sequel to the cartoon).
"Yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 11:31 AM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
Why would he need Disney's approval to make a film about a book older than Disney?
Did you notice the humongous Disney logos at the beginning and end of the trailer?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 12:32 PM
 
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton View Post
Did you notice the humongous Disney logos at the beginning and end of the trailer?
That could just be because Disney produced it, in which case sure.

I'm just saying if they had gone with Lionsgate or something, they wouldn't 've needed Disney's permission to do anything.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:15 PM
 
So I guess I'm the only one who has grown very weary of Burton copy/pasting his "style" onto everything?
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:17 PM
 
Maybe. I can't recall the last Tim Burton film I saw. Mars Attacks, maybe.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by smacintush View Post
So I guess I'm the only one who has grown very weary of Burton copy/pasting his "style" onto everything?
Feel free to enjoy Planet of the Apes.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
Maybe. I can't recall the last Tim Burton film I saw. Mars Attacks, maybe.
I can't remember the last Tim Burton movie I ENJOYED.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:36 PM
 
Well if you never liked the guy, of course this movie isn't for you.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:38 PM
 
Originally Posted by smacintush View Post
I can't remember the last Tim Burton movie I ENJOYED.
Edward Scissorhands?
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:43 PM
 
Originally Posted by smacintush View Post
So I guess I'm the only one who has grown very weary of Burton copy/pasting his "style" onto everything?
That's a bit like complaining about characters in Woody Allen movies being too neurotic, isn't it?

"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:55 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
Well if you never liked the guy, of course this movie isn't for you.
It's not that I don't LIKE him, I guess I overstated that. Now that I go back and look there are a few movies of his that I liked. It's just that the ones that are the most "Burtonesque" are the ones that I didn't enjoy.

I also love Johnny Depp, but strangely I don't enjoy him in Burton movies at all.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by SpaceMonkey View Post
That's a bit like complaining about characters in Woody Allen movies being too neurotic, isn't it?
Perhaps.
"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:58 PM
 
I think it looks interesting, but I think there are already enough dark movies on the market. It would have been awesome for Tim Burton to come up with something kid-friendly or more light hearted. Oh well, it's another movie to get from RedBox a few months after the DVD comes out.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 02:59 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
Edward Scissorhands?
Meh.

"Altruism is killing America. We who want to save America must repudiate this killer, root and branch. We must understand and explain to others that the acceptance of altruism necessitates the violation of individual rights... and that the arguments for altruism are baseless..."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 03:00 PM
 
Originally Posted by smacintush View Post
I also love Johnny Depp, but strangely I don't enjoy him in Burton movies at all.
To me, that makes sense. The director influences the actor's performance in most cases.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 05:46 PM
 
Anyone see that "Alice" that just aired on TV by the guy who did tinman? My friend was in it but I haven't watched it yet, just about to go have dinner with her though...
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 06:13 PM
 
Originally Posted by torsoboy View Post
I think it looks interesting, but I think there are already enough dark movies on the market. It would have been awesome for Tim Burton to come up with something kid-friendly or more light hearted. Oh well, it's another movie to get from RedBox a few months after the DVD comes out.
Too many dark movies?

Here's the current top 10:
  1. Disney cartoon
  2. Inspirational sports movie
  3. Inspirational sports movie
  4. Twilight (dark, I guess, but a completely different audience)
  5. Christmas movie
  6. Dark movie (also a completely different audience, though)
  7. Family comedy
  8. Popcorn flick
  9. Armored (not familiar enough to say what it is)
  10. Martial arts flick

How fluffy do your tastes have to be to find that list dark and oppressive?
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Rumor  (op)
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 07:17 PM
 
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES View Post
Anyone see that "Alice" that just aired on TV by the guy who did tinman? My friend was in it but I haven't watched it yet, just about to go have dinner with her though...
I saw it, and the visuals, like Tinman, were well done.
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 07:47 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
Too many dark movies?

Here's the current top 10:
  1. Disney cartoon
  2. Inspirational sports movie
  3. Inspirational sports movie
  4. Twilight (dark, I guess, but a completely different audience)
  5. Christmas movie
  6. Dark movie (also a completely different audience, though)
  7. Family comedy
  8. Popcorn flick
  9. Armored (not familiar enough to say what it is)
  10. Martial arts flick

How fluffy do your tastes have to be to find that list dark and oppressive?
I wasn't meaning at this specific time; of course Christmas has inspirational/family movies. I meant in general.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 10:20 PM
 
That's an even weirder claim. Especially when paired with the idea that there needs to be more kid-oriented stuff. If anything, I'd say Hollywood is lacking movies that intelligent adults can enjoy. Vapid family pap comes out at a pretty steady pace. There's been at least one kiddie flick that came out every month this year, and more some months.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 17, 2009, 11:35 PM
 
American McGee beat Burton to the punch, but I still want to see it because of Burton's dark style. Maybe it will include the political satire element.

Burton+Depp did amazingly well in Sweeney Todd.
(Last edited by The Godfather; Dec 17, 2009 at 11:41 PM. )
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2