 |
 |
Dell's Inspiron Zino HD
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anybody curious about this? I know virtually zero about it, but from what I can tell, it appears to be a poor man's Mac mini, and considering you can pick one up for as low as $230 (Apple TV price) I'm looking into it as a possible HTPC. Hell, you could even get the blu-ray drive and watch Blu-Ray movies in Boot Camp until OS X (maybe) gets support. The mac mini is a bit expensive for my tastes, and seems like overkill for how often I think I'll be using my HTPC.
I'm also curious whether you could install the Apple TV OS onto it (in a partition). I know that sounds backwards, but I like the idea of an OS that I can sync to my main library.
Thoughts? I realize it might be too early to tell.
|
DISCLAIMER: I have not watched the last two seasons of BSG yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm unfamiliar with AMD's processors, but system requirements for online flash video are substantial since, from what I understand, flash video relies solely on the processor. Intel's Atom can't do Hulu, even non-HD Hulu.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not too concerned with Hulu, especially since they're saying they want to go to some kind of pay model next year (I also haven't really used it since late winter). But I would be concerned if it couldn't do Silverlight/Netflix Streaming.
I do think I'd automatically up the processor to a dual core.
Edit: Can OS X even run on AMD? If not, we're done here.
|
DISCLAIMER: I have not watched the last two seasons of BSG yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
It does with a hacked kernel. It's not as smooth but people get it working.
|

PPC4Ever
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
If it's that much trouble, that probably throws the Apple TV OS right out the window, which is part of the allure.
|
DISCLAIMER: I have not watched the last two seasons of BSG yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Your mom's underwear drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
I'm unfamiliar with AMD's processors, but system requirements for online flash video are substantial since, from what I understand, flash video relies solely on the processor. Intel's Atom can't do Hulu, even non-HD Hulu.
Um, since when?
I've been able to watch HD and non-HD Hulu flawlessly on my Atom-based and Celeron-based netbooks.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Your mom's underwear drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't know how streaming video specifically would behave, but I can say that the whole hackintoshing thing is exceedingly easy at this point. Find a distro, burn it, and there are built-in patches for AMD CPUs, along with a variety of hardware.
I'd try it, at least. Otherwise, why not just map over the network to the drive where all your music and stuff is stored, or configure iTunes to use that location as the library?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Because I've found the second instance of iTunes will not always properly update the library xml file while the original instance of iTunes is still open.
Edit: That's not entirely correct. The second instance of iTunes does update the XML file, but whatever changes it makes are overwritten when the original instance shuts down as there is no "live updating" in iTunes as far as I know.
|
DISCLAIMER: I have not watched the last two seasons of BSG yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Your mom's underwear drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ouch. That sucks. Can Front Row work without an iTunes library file for streaming your stuff? What about something like BoxEE?
FWIW, Windows Media Center is pretty rockin, too...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's worthless to me without the play count and last played updates. Hence, my preference for the Apple TV OS, and it's iPod like abilities. Honestly, I'd probably have bit the bullet and bought one even if its overpriced, but with rumors of a hardware revision looming from two months ago, I don't know.
|
DISCLAIMER: I have not watched the last two seasons of BSG yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by shifuimam
Um, since when?
I've been able to watch HD and non-HD Hulu flawlessly on my Atom-based and Celeron-based netbooks.
Internal or external display? On my (wife's) Samsung NC10 Atom single core 1.6 and a gig of RAM, OS X stutters on Hulu SD when outputting to a 22" monitor at 1680x1050. My homebuilt PC running an Intel Atom board and two gigs of RAM does the same under XP to the same monitor.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
CPU looks to be comparable to a Pentium M, which has no problem with most 720p content in Windows.
If I didn't already have a bigger HTPC for games, I'd definitely get one.
Originally Posted by Laminar
I'm unfamiliar with AMD's processors, but system requirements for online flash video are substantial since, from what I understand, flash video relies solely on the processor. Intel's Atom can't do Hulu, even non-HD Hulu.
Less of an issue if you run Windows, since Flash performs so well on Windows compared to OS X/others.
|
|
Mac update estimates: MacBook Pro 1Q10 (quad core Nehalem [Clarksfield]); MacBook 1Q10 (Arrandale); MacBook Air 1Q10 (Arrandale LV); Mac Pro/Xserve 1Q10 (6 core Westmere, 64+GB RAM); iMac 3Q10 (quad core everywhere); Mac mini 2010
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
Less of an issue if you run Windows, since Flash performs so well on Windows compared to OS X/others.
Which is why I was surprised that my Windows box with twice as much RAM still couldn't pull it off.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
Anybody curious about this?
I'm very interested, hadn't heard of it before.
Took a while for it to come up on the French Dell site. Not sure if its good value or not (been a while since I looked at PC prices) 830€ for : AMD X2 6850E at 1,8 GHz, Windows® 7 Family Edition 64 Bit, ATI Radeon™ HD 4330 512 Mo, 6G RAM (800 MHz), disk 1 T (7200 tr/min), Blu-ray read only.
The 'problem' is the Blue Ray. If you could write to it, this little box would have been ordered.
BTW 830€ is over $1200  The cheapest Zino (non HD) is 280€ - over $400
|
|
XBL : veteran35th
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Your mom's underwear drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Internal or external display? On my (wife's) Samsung NC10 Atom single core 1.6 and a gig of RAM, OS X stutters on Hulu SD when outputting to a 22" monitor at 1680x1050. My homebuilt PC running an Intel Atom board and two gigs of RAM does the same under XP to the same monitor.
User error?
eeePC 701 with XP Pro, Acer Aspire One with both XP Pro and 7 Home Premium, HP Mini 1000 with XP Pro - they all handle Hulu fine on the laptop's display.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by shifuimam
User error?
HAHAHAAAA
What, did he click the play button wrong?
|
DISCLAIMER: I have not watched the last two seasons of BSG yet.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Your mom's underwear drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hey, it's the answer I'm usually given when I have an issue with OS X.
At any rate, I just tried to play some stuff, and it seems like something has changed with Hulu. I used to be able to watch HD videos in full screen even on my eeePC 701 without any issues. The framerate drops a bit in full sreen now. Oh well.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Displaying Flash content on a 1080p display is more taxing than displaying it on a lower resolution display due to the upscaling. What plays smoothly on a smaller display will stutter on a larger one.
|
|
Vandelay Industries
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Round Rock, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by shifuimam
Hey, it's the answer I'm usually given when I have an issue with OS X.
At any rate, I just tried to play some stuff, and it seems like something has changed with Hulu. I used to be able to watch HD videos in full screen even on my eeePC 701 without any issues. The framerate drops a bit in full sreen now. Oh well.
But were all of those on the internal display?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by shifuimam
Hey, it's the answer I'm usually given when I have an issue with OS X.
But the difference is I know what I'm doing in both OS X and XP. I didn't just use OS X for IRC and Safari for a week and declare myself a power user.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|