 |
 |
IBM kills Cell CPU
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Did Toshiba use it too?
Anywho, doesn't matter. It works in the PS3 and that's all it ever really needed to do anyway.
Not like the PPC chip in the Xbox has much of a future nor does the hamster in a wheel in the Wii either.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
It matters in as much as it was billed as the second coming of christ for a time.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Oakland, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
IBM: We'll Keep Making Cell Processors As Long As Sony Needs Them
- So don't worry about Sony running out of chips anytime soon. IBM has them covered. As for the fate of the Cell processor technology? Well that will live on as well says Turek, as "the core technology of the Cell processor will continue to proliferate throughout the IBM product line." -
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
Did Toshiba use it too?
Yes, they've put them in a few notebooks, but I don't think this has had much of an impact.
Regarding other IBM cpus, there is plenty in IBM's oven: they're planning successors to their PowerPC 440/450 embedded cpus whose derivatives are used in their super computers. I can imagine that they put not just two or four, but a bunch of them onto a single die. The PowerPC A2 will include AltiVec, for instance.
|
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
It matters in as much as it was billed as the second coming of christ for a time.
By who? The internet?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hampton Roads, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
By who? The internet?
Mac users (who didn't know what they were talking about) before the Intel switch, which included most of the rumor sites.
|
All glory to the hypnotoad.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
By who? The internet?
Whoever it was that was talking **** about it being in your toasters and tvs to become part of some kind of super processor.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jokell82
Mac users (who didn't know what they were talking about) before the Intel switch, which included most of the rumor sites.
Well God knows what they were thinking, I mean I remember Eug holding out for about 3 years thinking that a G5 laptop was right around the corner when the heatsink in the G5 towers were about 10 pounds on their own. I don't think too many mac users thought this cell would be in Macs though.
From the start everyone said it was hard to program for and used a lot of power so who knows what the fanboys were thinking.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|

Newt 2012-The Republican Revolution Returns!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yea it turns out the world isn't too thrilled about single precision arithmetic.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
I can tell, though, that the PPC is preparing for a comeback. 
|

Newt 2012-The Republican Revolution Returns!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just like the Roman Empire.
Any day now...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CharlesS
Just like the Roman Empire.
Any day now...
You mean Hitler's Germany?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
No, that was quite a different animal. And it fell apart fairly quickly after it came into existence too, so I don't think it would be a great example either way.
Although I do have to say I'm impressed — I really didn't expect Godwin's Law to pop up in this thread. Nice job.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
I can tell, though, that the PPC is preparing for a comeback.
PPC's best chance is Linux for embedded applications (apparently it has a big following in Australia and Israel). And even in that area, it is overshadowed by ARM.
I'd like to be surprised by a product by the PPC team from former PA Semi, now that it joined our fruit company.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
The geek in me is kinda disappointed cause of the scalability that was promised with the Cell platform..... wasted R&D imo. I thought in time the Cell would become the successor to the PPC., and might even make it into workstations.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jun 2009
Status:
Offline
|
|
That sucks. CELL had a bright future.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by downinflames68
CELL had a bright future.
Yeah, I guess that's why they're killing it off. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Should've been licensable by other manufacturers like the ARM company does for its ARM architecture. In fact, it may not be too late yet to grab a sizable share of personal computing applications. Give it a couple of years and ARM performance will be on par with PPC, it will be a no-brainer for embedded applications, with its diverse and feature-full chips available from different manufacturers.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jun 2009
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
Should've been licensable by other manufacturers like the ARM company does for its ARM architecture. In fact, it may not be too late yet to grab a sizable share of personal computing applications. Give it a couple of years and ARM performance will be on par with PPC, it will be a no-brainer for embedded applications, with its diverse and feature-full chips available from different manufacturers.
ARM is the market leader in the embedded market by a very wide margin and ARM cores could easily be used for supercomputers already. IBMs fastest super computers rely on a rather old PowerPC core specialized for embedded applications, the PowerPC 440 and 450. As a matter of fact, you can find these in quite a few printers, my Kyocera printer uses a 266 MHz PowerPC 405 cpu.
|
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by downinflames68
Air Force orders 2,200 PlayStation 3s - Air Force News, news from Iraq - Air Force Times
The Air Force is ordering 2,200 Sony PlayStation 3s, but it won’t be using them to play “Call of Duty 4.”
The video-game consoles will be networked together to create a massive computing cluster that will be used for special projects at an Air Force Research Laboratory center in Rome, N.Y.
The service is expanding its stock of 336 PlayStations, which are linked in 14 clusters of 24, with a powerful “compute node” attached to each cluster.
Mark Barnell, high performance computing director for AFRL’s information directorate, said he expects the PlayStations to cost about $650,000, and the entire project to cost less than $2 million. The consoles are inexpensive, he said, because the price of manufacturing them is effectively subsidized by gamers.

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|