Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Album Only

Album Only
Thread Tools
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2012, 12:00 PM
 
I wanted a song. It was "Album Only".

It took me 15 seconds to steal it off the web, no client needed except my browser.

In another 10 seconds it was through iTunes Match and I was downloading the iTunes version.


I went into this enterprise with the full intention of paying you. Don't you stupid ****ups realize that?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2012, 12:11 PM
 
No, they don't. Music Industry executives (and some musicians) seem to be born morons.

-t
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2012, 12:14 PM
 
The industry needs to die in a fire.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 3, 2012, 08:32 PM
 
NO, but the executives need to "get burned" one way or another so they start actually thinking about how THEY are killing sales.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2012, 12:31 AM
 
If only THEY would engage us as the significant others that feed them rather than as naughty children, we could co-operate. THEY see it it as zero-sum, we as win-win.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2012, 11:10 PM
 
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 4, 2012, 11:27 PM
 
Worth it for "****hammer".
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 05:31 AM
 
That wasn't the "*****" I was expecting. Totally worth it!

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 06:02 AM
 
I ran into a similar unreasonable problem: I've downloaded a few episodes of House in HD. This time, I wanted to watch them on my large external screen, but all I got was a warning that I'm not allowed to play back video on my external monitor. I forgot about the condition that the connection to the monitor must be encrypted, argh! (I connect my monitor via DVI and a DisplayPort-DVI adapter.)

Why does the industry punish honest people? If I had pirated those episodes instead, I wouldn't have any restrictions on how to play them back.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 07:06 AM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
I ran into a similar unreasonable problem: I've downloaded a few episodes of House in HD. This time, I wanted to watch them on my large external screen, but all I got was a warning that I'm not allowed to play back video on my external monitor. I forgot about the condition that the connection to the monitor must be encrypted, argh! (I connect my monitor via DVI and a DisplayPort-DVI adapter.)

Why does the industry punish honest people? If I had pirated those episodes instead, I wouldn't have any restrictions on how to play them back.
I actually had that copy protection trip for a Mac connected to a compliant TV. HDMI to HDMI.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 09:44 AM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
I actually had that copy protection trip for a Mac connected to a compliant TV. HDMI to HDMI.
HDMI doesn't imply HDCP (it's optional).

Also there are a variety of crappy HDCP implementations on the market.
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 09:47 AM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
I actually had that copy protection trip for a Mac connected to a compliant TV. HDMI to HDMI.
Do you know of any workaround?
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 10:12 AM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
HDMI doesn't imply HDCP (it's optional).

Also there are a variety of crappy HDCP implementations on the market.
Technically you are right - it is the "HD Ready" logo that requires HDCP. HDMI does however require (from 1.3 on) that if HDCP is included, it must pass certain tests.

FWIW, I have never seen an HDMI-capable TV that does not support HDCP.
The current Mac Pro is the most out-of-date Mac since the Macintosh Portable
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 11:10 AM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
Do you know of any workaround?
HDFury

But that only works for HDMI/HDCP sources, not your case of a crappy adapter breaking the secure chain.
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 12:17 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
HDFury

But that only works for HDMI/HDCP sources, not your case of a crappy adapter breaking the secure chain.
The adapter isn't crappy, it works perfectly, it's DRM that's crappy
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 01:10 PM
 
subego, why do you feel entitled to purchase any song as a single?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 01:20 PM
 
It is Big Media that are a bunch of raging ****hammers. The president of the RIAA still doesn't think that CD ripping is fair use.

The Oatmeal comic is cut off in the sixth panel. But that's ok, I saw it a few days ago.

The "album only" thing is an issue of big media believing bundling is a worthwhile strategy, when it's just a consumer-hostile strategy. We see it all the time with stupid bundling plans in cable television, or the fact that you can't buy Revenge of the Sith on Blu-Ray without buying the entire prequel trilogy in a single bundle. Of course, you can't see any of the Star Wars flicks on Netflix, on iTunes, or anywhere else online.

And then there's the ridiculous scam that is Digital Copy, which will expire if you don't install it fast enough. I actually used my Digital Copy of Watchmen, only to discover that it's a different version of the film: the DVD is the extended edition, the DC is the theatrical version. A proper rip of the film solved that stupidity.

My biggest gripe is that DVDs now don't include all the content of the Blu-Ray (a tech I'm not gonna adopt anyway). I was pissed when I discovered that The Dark Knight DVD didn't include a director commentary, but the Blu-Ray did. WTF?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 01:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
subego, why do you feel entitled to purchase any song as a single?
Ah yes, the "entitlement" smear.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 01:32 PM
 
The industry killed itself. Apple showed them the way with 99 cent music and it created a paying industry in spite of the fact you could get the music totally free. But at 99 cents it made it affordable to spend money. Movie industry needs to catch up. I will not spend 20 bucks on a digital movie. I won't spend 5.00 on a rental either.
Blandine Bureau 1940 - 2011
Missed 2012 by 3 days, RIP Grandma :-(
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 02:30 PM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna View Post
The Oatmeal comic is cut off in the sixth panel. But that's ok, I saw it a few days ago.
I linked to the full version at Oatmeal's site, I just posted the first image.
     
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 02:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna View Post
Ah yes, the "entitlement" smear.
It seemed like it was missing.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 03:08 PM
 
Note to self: get Game of Thrones.

-t
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 03:12 PM
 
Originally Posted by mduell View Post
HDMI doesn't imply HDCP (it's optional).

Also there are a variety of crappy HDCP implementations on the market.
My point was I didn't have DVI in the chain.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 03:27 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
subego, why do you feel entitled to purchase any song as a single?
Not a bad question.

Upon reflection I'd say it's mainly because that's the model for the store I patronize.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2012, 03:58 PM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
Do you know of any workaround?
Bitching to Apple got me my money back, but no Mythbusters.
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2012, 04:07 AM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
subego, why do you feel entitled to purchase any song as a single?
That's the wrong question. The right one is: do media companies want to make money by selling stuff people want? Here, some media company lost some business.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Land of the Easily Amused
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2012, 03:59 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Not a bad question.

Upon reflection I'd say it's mainly because that's the model for the store I patronize.
But you've got to ask yourself: Do more people buy the entire album (because they, after being unable to buy the single, sample the rest of the songs on the album and discover they're of a similar quality)? Or do more people give up and then find a way to retrieve the file illegally?

In the first instance, someone is spending $10 or so.
If it was available as a single, you'd be spending $1.
Are there 10X more people that get pissed and pirate it than folks that buy the whole album? I'm not sure, but it seems entirely possible.
     
subego  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 6, 2012, 05:52 PM
 
My experience has been albums with songs of similar quality don't offer album only songs.

It is used exclusively when the rest of the album is a stinking pile.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2012, 10:18 AM
 
I found this problem on a few compilation albums, Switchfoot's best of had ONE new song, (actually it was from the Narnia movies which also had it as album only on their sound tracks), they also had a song on Hawaii Five O's sound track that was album only. Mat Kearney had a great song on Soul Surfer's sound track which was also album only. In all cases it took me about twenty minutes to find the free version online and I've enjoyed the song. I often buy whole albums, but especially for compilations it's stupid as hell.

Then you also get albums that don't get released on Canadian iTunes because the labels want us to go get the CD. Hence the album gets pirated.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:21 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2013 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2