Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > How Wikipedia really works...

How Wikipedia really works...
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Middle of Germany
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 2, 2017, 10:29 AM

I thought I can add Wikipedia articles every once in a while. Sometimes, I come across information in articles that is simply wrong, sometimes I think I can add something to the article. Do you sometimes write for Wikipedia? Do you think it's easy to stick with the rules? What is relevant and what isn't? How do you handle image rights, you can't use any image on the web, right? Is it hard to write for Wikipedia? There are some things you always know very well, right, so everyone can add something...

Edit: Right, I wanted to ask something. Sometimes, I think you should add a section like "meaning" of a personality, for instance. Sometimes, Wikipedia reiterates clearly what happened to a person, or during an event, but lacks information that might direct a discussion. For instance: Sartre is regarded as something like the Jesus Christ of modern philosophy, having had a different impact than many other philosophers, he improved understanding in society and participated in many public debates etc.
What do you think? Can I add such thoughts to wikipedia articles? I can't give any reference here... Maybe, it's a misunderstanding with Wikipedia, though, where there are so many references.

Think a new age is coming.
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Irvine, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 2, 2017, 10:27 PM
I have been thinking about this a lot. I have some ideas to contribute to some topics, but haven't gotten around to it. I think if I start then I cannot stop.
{{{ mindwaves }}}
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 2, 2017, 11:24 PM
I've heard rumors of petty squabble culture, so I've stayed away.

In terms of putting opinions, I think the basic idea is "[some person] considers Sartre to be the 'Jesus of philosophy'[citation]"

The "some person" should preferably not be a random idiot.
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:26 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2