 |
 |
ram disk for safari?
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: melbourne, australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
i remember in OS9 i used to store IE5's cache in a desktop ram disk: this made it much faster.
CacheCleaner for OSX can create a ram disk: would it be possible, or worthwhile, to use it for safari?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
perhaps, but you'll have to figure out how to get safari to change its cache location to the ram disk.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chico, CA and Carlsbad, CA.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by posthumanus:
i remember in OS9 i used to store IE5's cache in a desktop ram disk: this made it much faster.
CacheCleaner for OSX can create a ram disk: would it be possible, or worthwhile, to use it for safari?
Make Safari faster? Hehe. That's just silly. 
|
"In Nomine Patris, Et Fili, Et Spiritus Sancti"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by fulmer:
perhaps, but you'll have to figure out how to get safari to change its cache location to the ram disk.
suppose you could just replace it with an alias.
the cache is in /Library/Caches/Safari
change that to an alias of a folder on the RAM Disk,,,, not tried it - but dont see why it wouldnt work
|
|
I free'd my mind... now it won't come back.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
