 |
 |
MOSR reports Safari V.72
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Oakland, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was wondering if this was true? Or is it just a typo?
"The last version we commented on was v67, over a week ago; the most recent build is now v72"
www.macosrumors.com
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: The bottom of Cloud City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by ae86_16v:
I was wondering if this was true? Or is it just a typo?
"The last version we commented on was v67, over a week ago; the most recent build is now v72"
www.macosrumors.com
Pfff, MOSR. Please.
|
"Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Didn't they report that 10.2.5 wouldn't be out for a few more weeks just yesterday?
Bah.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am running v71 right now. I was trying to post a pic, cut I went over my bandwith limit for this month already;/
|
|
Garrett
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Status:
Offline
|
|
They must of meant v71. Only a little mistake, that's all 
Ming
|
|
A Proud Mac User Since: 03/24/03
Apple Computer: MacBook 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 3 GB Memory, 120 GB HD
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The dark side of the moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gorickey:
Didn't they report that 10.2.5 wouldn't be out for a few more weeks just yesterday?
Bah.
You would've wanted that to be the case, eh?
Anyway, as late as March 23th, they said:
OS X 10.2.5 may be released significantly sooner than once thought, in order to clear up several significant issues seen with the current 10.2.4 release -- most notably, the re-setting of built-in clock timers on many Macs back to the default date and time after a restart. We could see the release of 10.2.5 as soon as the first week of April, and as a result of that accelerated schedule, we may see a 10.2.6 release before 10.3 Panther ships later this year.
Which in part. so far, has been pretty accurate.
Granted, MOSR deals with rumors, something inherently uncertain, but at least they don't try to make it sound like it's facts.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Urbandale, IA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by warpmoon:
[...] but at least they don't try to make it sound like it's facts.
...Anymore.
...After having been wrong.
...Many times.
|
|
"Yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation" yields a falsehood when preceded by its quotation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by warpmoon:
MOSR, Which in part. so far, has been pretty accurate.
You gotta be kidding!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by warpmoon:
Granted, MOSR deals with rumors, something inherently uncertain, but at least they don't try to make it sound like it's facts.
re: macosrumors
I thought it was just some guy occasionally adding weekly blog entries to his website...  Have any of his predictions ever come true?
Noah
|
|
Macbook 2.0 Ghz - Black
iPhone 4GB - Fido
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Picture for those that want it. 71 is the latest leaked beta anyways.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
