 |
 |
new AppleWorks 6.2.7
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
After the AppleStore went down, I see this..
AppleWorks 6.2.7.. it is under "Apple Software" page
AppleWorks 6.2.7 (M9057Z/A) Est. shipping 7-10 days $79
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London'ish
Status:
Offline
|
|
OOooooooooooooooo......
Maybe if you go to a real AppleStore, they might have it in a real box, just like that one.. And just maybe you will even get to touch it!!
Then you can come back here and tell us all about it.
|
|
The worst thing about having a failing memory is..... no, it's gone.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: United States
Status:
Offline
|
|
And... what's so different about this one?
Ming
|
|
A Proud Mac User Since: 03/24/03
Apple Computer: MacBook 2.0GHz Intel Core 2 Duo, 3 GB Memory, 120 GB HD
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by nobitacu:
And... what's so different about this one?
Ming
Old:
The new box fits in with the other Apple software boxes, and it might mean that we won't see a major AW update in a long time (or that Apple don't want AppleGaramond on any of their boxes).
|
|
JLL
- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
But isn't 6.2.4 the most current version?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NY, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
yes, hopefully this means an update very soon...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator Emeritus 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin, MN, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just want AW 7...
We need a decent word processor.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would hope that it doesn't, you know, suck. Or at least, I hope it sucks a lot less than the current version, which was the original Bad Carbon Port in its first OSX incarnation and is only marginally better now.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Status:
Offline
|
|
So, I'm confused... is there a 6.2.7 update out there? Because I can't see it @ apple.com/software under "Downloads:" or apple.com/appleworks. Ugh I want to stop using Word... 
|
|
MBP 1.83 GHz CD/iPod 30GB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mark9939:
So, I'm confused... is there a 6.2.7 update out there?
For what it's worth, Appleworks 6.2.6 was included in the most recent disk image supplied by Apple to the Maine Learning Technology Initiative for the 38,000 iBooks issued to Maine's 7th and 8th graders.
Corruption in the presentation module is addressed specifically in the update.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Between Sydney and Melbourne
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Millennium:
I would hope that it doesn't, you know, suck. Or at least, I hope it sucks a lot less than the current version, which was the original Bad Carbon Port in its first OSX incarnation and is only marginally better now.
It was the original carbon port, Still has loads of OS9 widgets and interface elements.
We need a totaly new app.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would love to see AppleWorks 7 be a OpenOffice port... bring the best parts of AppleWorks and OpenOffice to the table...
I just don't think it's worth Apple's time to work on a office app. all alone...
Think Safari...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Right Here
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use AppleWorks 6.2.4 as my main word processor and I like it. I don't think it's bad at all.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like the Appleworks suite as well, it does what it's supposed to do.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
I would love to see AppleWorks 7 be a OpenOffice port... bring the best parts of AppleWorks and OpenOffice to the table...
I just don't think it's worth Apple's time to work on a office app. all alone...
Think Safari...
That sounds like a truely horrible prosepect...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Good question...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
I would love to see AppleWorks 7 be a OpenOffice port... bring the best parts of AppleWorks and OpenOffice to the table...
I just don't think it's worth Apple's time to work on a office app. all alone...
Think Safari...
Good point. Apple needs some way to compete with microsoft, and they are doing a good job with safari.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
I would love to see AppleWorks 7 be a OpenOffice port... bring the best parts of AppleWorks and OpenOffice to the table...
I just don't think it's worth Apple's time to work on a office app. all alone...
Think Safari...
Yep. My vote is in favor as well. 
|
|
•
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status:
Offline
|
|
what about things like Kword and all the other Kapps?
Are any of them worth apple's time or would Open Office be a much better app to work with?
I tried OOo for the PC and it was OK... crashed and killed my paper but other than that...
I'd love to see apple bundle some sorta OS X office suite I dono why... I mean M$ does have a pretty good suite..... but it's so freaking expencive.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Superchic[k]en:
what about things like Kword and all the other Kapps?
Are any of them worth apple's time or would Open Office be a much better app to work with?
I tried OOo for the PC and it was OK... crashed and killed my paper but other than that...
I think similar to what they did with KHTML for Safari they could just use OOo for the core routines and classes. But re-think the whole UI and maybe introduce some new concepts. I highly doubt we would be really happy if they just took OOo the way it is today and re-compiled it for native Aqua.
|
|
•
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple just updated the AppleWorks site.. I guess..
Take a look of the specification
Apple - AppleWorks - Technical Specifications
Any "new" things from this version other than the fonts, clip arts, and templates.
Still Mac OS 8.1 or later... can't wait for the full cocoa AppleWorks
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Its theoretically possible to simply use the core routines of OOo and build off of that. In fact, there _is_ a Java version of the interface, alongside the normal C++ version of the interface.
What some people don't realize though is that it would take a bunch of work. Witness our NeoOffice project. But I suppose if either Ed or I could work on it full time it would be a lot farther along right now.
Personally, if Apple picked up OOo and tried to run with it, I think they could make a very decent office suite that would be very competitive. It would probably be a fork though, since lots of stuff would need to be changed.
Dan
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Kenneth:
can't wait for the full cocoa AppleWorks
Why is everyone so obsessed with Cocoa apps?
|
Stink different.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by stew:
Why is everyone so obsessed with Cocoa apps?
I dunno, I always thought cocoa stuff was slower
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Anomalous:
I use AppleWorks 6.2.4 as my main word processor and I like it. I don't think it's bad at all.
The M$ file translators leave a lot to be desired. They have a habit of crashing AW and whacking the file that I'm trying to save. (Maybe that's some sort of 'feature', like a Windows product...)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by stew:
Why is everyone so obsessed with Cocoa apps?
Clean, simple, no bloat, support all major MacOS X features such as real toolbar, slide-in window with transparency, etc etc.
Cocoa easily look better and code is way smaller/simple therefore we will get more features than bug fixes 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Good question...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by stew:
Why is everyone so obsessed with Cocoa apps?
'cause its quaity! 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by gururafiki:
'cause its quaity!
I guess you especially appreciate the system wide spell checker in Cocoa apps. 
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|