 |
 |
moving the applications folder
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would like to move the applications folder, but I don't know how. Of course I can copy (almost) all apps in there to another partition (which I did), but I would like to know whether it is possible to do this, and how.
The problem is that my osx-partition is too small, and everytime when I update, I get into trouble. At the time I thought 3GB would do, but now it seems too small. Maya 4.5PLE is one of the main problems. I tried to move it, but then it won't start anymore. Even a dynamic link doesn't do it.
So I thought if I could move the complete applications folder to another partition and use a dynamic link, that would solve the problem. I've done this with my home-folder and all user-accounts, and with the developer-folder (even though it refuses to install on another partition), so I've saved a lot of space there, but this one is a problem.
Any suggestions?
|
|
"Chance is irrelevant. We will succeed."
== 7 of 9 ==
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do not move either the Applications folder or the apps installed by the OS X CD. In the future when you Update Software if there are improved versions of the basic set of apps which were initially installed, then the update will try to place the new version in the Application folder and you will end up two of some apps.
Apple designed and implemented the OS like this and we have to adapt.
HTH
Craig
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do *not* do this
Many apps/classes/frameworks depend on that folder...
some even have that path hardcoded...
and I'm not even mentioning permissions issues it'd create..
don't do that, trust me.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by ervier:
Maya 4.5PLE is one of the main problems. I tried to move it, but then it won't start anymore. Even a dynamic link doesn't do it.
I haven't installed the PLE in a while, but does the installer give you the option of where to install? Perhaps you could uninstall, and reinstall on a partition where you've got more room.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Milan, Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Personally, I have the Apple-installed and "shared" (among all accounts) apps in the standard /Applications folder, while the third party (no Software Update, thus) apps I only use in my own account are in the ~/Applications folder (in the home directory, that is, and also on another partition): that's a quite common power user arrangement, AFAIK...
|
The freedom of all is essential to my freedom. - Mikhail Bakunin
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, King
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why couldn't he just make a hardlink (using ln) to it?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Milan, Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by bmedina:
Why couldn't he just make a hardlink (using ln) to it?
One big problem seems to be (AFAIK) that Apple's Installer and Software Update apps don't like links of any kind: they want the "real" /Applications folder in its original place (someone more expert on this could give a better explanation, maybe). This could change in future OS X releases, of course - in the meantime, creating a new ~/Applications folder for personal, additional third-party apps could be a good solution for power users, as it also enables Services for the apps inside it (contrarily to putting your apps anywhere you like, possibly meaning having to sacrifice Services)...
|
The freedom of all is essential to my freedom. - Mikhail Bakunin
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by bmedina:
Why couldn't he just make a hardlink (using ln) to it?
Well, it's a folder. You can't make a hard link to a folder...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Yokohama, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
And, as I understand it, hardlinking something basically makes it exist in two places at once, so it'll take up twice as much disk space.
Just leave the Apple apps where they are.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by wataru:
And, as I understand it, hardlinking something basically makes it exist in two places at once, so it'll take up twice as much disk space.
Just leave the Apple apps where they are.
No, it would take up the same amount of space as a single file.
But, you can't hard link a folder.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Bolton, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have my /Applications (and a few other bits such as /usr/local) on a separate partition, with a symbolic link. Everything works, including services, except for software update. After every software update, I check to see whether it has overwritten the link, and if so I type the following commands into a terminal:
cd /
sudo cp -R /Applications/* /Volumes/Apps/Applications
sudo rm -R /Applications
sudo ln -s /Volumes/Apps/Applications
where "Apps" is the name of my applications partition. So far, this hasn't given me any trouble, except that sometimes the finder reports the old version number for an updated application. It's not guaranteed, as it could leave junk around which should be removed by software update. Probably other things could go wrong too, but they haven't yet!
Barney.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|