 |
 |
MSN for OS X Screenshots & First Impressions
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Basement
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
(Last edited by brainchild2b; May 15, 2003 at 09:57 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: columbus, oh
Status:
Offline
|
|
1) MSN Chat is Windows only. (so much for MSN with kids)
2) Its as slow as IE, which I am surprised at considering how long this was supposed to be in development.
3) CSS issues exist like in IE 5.2
4) Windows Media Player is still version 7.2.
Just a few issues that I've encountered.
|
|
"Another classic science-fiction show cancelled before its time" ~ Bender
15.2" PowerBook 1.25GHz, 80GB HD, 768MB RAM, SuperDrive
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Basement
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been told that they are waiting to release the next version of MS Office and IE 6 for the new Apple processors. MSN Explorer that has already been built around IE 6 code will be rolled out then.
Just what I heard, no idea if it's true.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Nottingham, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Are you running a theme there brainchild?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think it looks worse than the PC version, but hey I am also near North Hollywood, Im in Miramar. What a small world, I go to the same college as Adam Betts and everywhere on the forum are Mac Users that I could easily have run into before.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, even though I don't have an MSN subscription, thank God you can have the icon only bounce once instead of continuously.
Or did they already release Messenger that did that? Anyhoo, I'm happy, that's one reason I never used MSN much.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh
Status:
Offline
|
|
That button bar looks like a row of unrelated floating objects,
objects that are completely detached from the window.
This seems like poor interface design to me. Web-sites are graphics
laden and busy already. The interface would be much better if it were
visually cohesive, subconsciouly recognized as one ojbect in
the real-world.
Then again... microsoft doesn't even portray window frames as single
objects in winXp... more like snap together plastic pieces in a cheap
toy airplane model.
I guess they're continuing the trend: Litter the screen with
disjointed widgets and objects but no logical or visual cohesion. Can
their visual/ineraction designers really be this clueless? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Basement
Status:
Offline
|
|
The interface should be ignored for reviewing purposes because they made it to be a "dashboard" and that buy GUI standards is allowance to have whatever interface outside of the os widgets. It's a great interface for novices, and it matches msn on windows which is a good thing for uniformity.
I'm guessing if i had a 1.4ghz powermac it would be perfect for my mother.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Cybertron
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is it actually possible to test this without choosing one of the 3 "offers"?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|