 |
 |
How snappy is your OS X?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do you think your OS X is snappy/responsive? (not talking about things like rendering speed etc., just UI responsiveness)
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why does the mouse matter?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, I'd answer but this feels like somehow the mouse is responsible.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mrmister:
Yes, I'd answer but this feels like somehow the mouse is responsible.
No, of course the mouse is not responsible for it. Just answer the question.
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use a wacom and it is dead fast like...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
My machine (iMac 800) feels pretty snappy, the multi-button mouse with scrollwheel helped improve productivity quite a bit.
Steve W
|
|
MacBook 2.0 160/2GB/SuperDrive
Lots of older Macs
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Internets
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: The Sar Chasm
Status:
Offline
|
|
My dual gig hums along nicely, thank you.
My Cube is starting to show its age, however. (somebody wanna spot me the $750.00 I need for a processor and video card upgrade?)
CV
|
When a true genius appears in the world you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in confederacy against him. -- Jonathan Swift.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Evansville, IN
Status:
Offline
|
|
my iBook 500 cries because OS X is so slow once you get going in it (and i have maxxed the ram)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Developer:
No, of course the mouse is not responsible for it. Just answer the question.
Then how come the mouse is included in the answers?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by bradoesch:
Then how come the mouse is included in the answers?
Don't think too much about the mouse thing. Just answer whether you think your OS X feels pretty responsive or rather slowish.
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Slow.
Logitech Marble Mouse (trackball) & Logitech cordless ball-mouse.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
I fail to see the point of this poll 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Safe House
Status:
Offline
|
|
My dual 1.25 loads Photoshop in 6.5sec. Safari
launches and loads my GoogleNews homepage
in 3.5sec. To me that's pretty 'snappy'. All this with a lowly stock optical Apple mouse. I lay awake nights thinking about a scroll wheel and second button. Imagine the speed!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Orion27:
My dual 1.25 loads Photoshop in 6.5sec. Safari
launches and loads my GoogleNews homepage
in 3.5sec. To me that's pretty 'snappy'.
That's benchmarking. With snappy I mean more like has it a fast and fluid feeling? Does it feel responsive?
That's not necessarily app launch time, render times, file copy times etc.
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Orion27:
My dual 1.25 loads Photoshop in 6.5sec. Safari
launches and loads my GoogleNews homepage
in 3.5sec. To me that's pretty 'snappy'. All this with a lowly stock optical Apple mouse. I lay awake nights thinking about a scroll wheel and second button. Imagine the speed!
Ehh, my DP1250 loads photoshop in 15 secs, ~6.5 secs on second launch (since it is cached).
UI is quite snappy though. Except for window resizing. Stupid window resizing.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
My iBook is snappy with both the builtin trackpad and Kensington Turboball (I use both about equally).

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Robinson, IL
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Developer:
Don't think too much about the mouse thing. Just answer whether you think your OS X feels pretty responsive or rather slowish.
Don't tell me to "not think about it", you asked the question! Why do you care what the mouse is? If the mouse doesn't matter, why ask? I demand to know!!!!!
[/strident] 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's got the Snap in its step, for sure.
Oh, and I use a Wacom Graphire2 as my primary pointing device.
|
|
I offer strictly b2b web-based server-side enterprise solutions for growing e-business trusted content providers ;]
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
OS X is still slower than OS 9 by a fair margin regardless of the pointing device I use, even the middle one :0
-- asxless in iLand
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Shipped to another country by the US to be tortured so they can avoid Int. law.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Not bad here, responsive enough.
Pismo 400 with 768mb ram and a logitech 3 button mouse.
Never tried Apple's mouse and the trackpad is never as good as the mouse.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hey Developer, are you going to let us in on your secret eventually or what? This poll has soundly demonstrated that more people have multibutton mice and Apple pro-mice. Incredible.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: fredericksburg va
Status:
Offline
|
|
single button mouses are crap
I wish Apple would wake up and smell the coffee
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by willed:
Hey Developer, are you going to let us in on your secret eventually or what? This poll has soundly demonstrated that more people have multibutton mice and Apple pro-mice. Incredible.
OK, here's the secret behind this poll:
I have a cheap mouse (one with a ball) just for the scrollwheel. I got hooked to the scrollwheel and used it for a few months now. But I got problems with my hand and hat to go back to the single button mouse.
The first few minutes with the Apple Pro mouse was like - wow. The mouse slided so fluently over the desk it was like hovering over it. And everything felt so smooth.
So I thought I make it a poll and see if that yields some results:
24% of Apple Pro mouse users think their system is slowish.
18% of third party mouse users think their system is slowish.
So it's actually the other way around. But I don't think the difference is significant with so few votes. And of course the poll would only work if computer speeds would distribute evenly between the mouse groups. It might be that "pro" users buy faster Macs and that they also buy multi button mouse (I think pro users are also the reason why in this pro user's forum are more third party mouse users than usual).
And of course it is not sure that the third party mouses are all worse than Apple's (in fact it's probably hard to find such a cheap thing like mine).
I still think it would be interesting to investigate the effect of the mouse on perceived speed under controlled conditions (same Mac, same display resolution, same acceleration curve).
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
TiBook 500 MHz 768 MB RAM
iMac 233 MHz 512 MB RAM
iMac 400 MHz 1024 MB RAM
All have 10.2.6 installed.
Using:
Kensington Orbit (trackball)
iMac Bondi Blue "Puck"
MacAlly one button mouse
Logitech MX 700
Logitech Cordless MouseMan Optical
Wacom Tablet
Trackpad (TiBook)
Don't understand what the hell makes the difference in mouse using concerning "snappy"TM.
I know these machines are quite a bit old, but even on a friends PowerMac 867 MHz G4 "snappy"TM is a joke, specially comparing to OS 9.
I do love OS X for its obvious reasons, but every time I read somewhere about "snappy"TM I either laugh or cry...
P.S. I did not vote, since there's no option for me
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Edmonton, AB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Slow with 3rd party mouse, but that's due to my old iMac 400.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|