Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > iChat + iTunes...

iChat + iTunes...
Thread Tools
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 13, 2003, 08:23 PM
 
How cool would it be if Apple integrated iTunes and iChat. Imagine chatting with a friend and being able to stream a song to them. A link to the song would appear in their chat window which would take them to the appropriate page at the iTMS for purchasing the song, album, etc. MSN chat lets you share music with a small group, right? Well, Apple could one-up them by integrating iChat seamlessly with iTunes just like they did with the rest of iLife.

I think the linking for the iTMS is already present as you can link to songs from a browser, right? And we know that iTunes can stream music. I doubt the RIAA would have a problem with this if Apple limited it to one song a time that included the link to purchase the music in the chat window. One song at a time would make it sufficiently difficult to prevent people from mass-copying stuff as there are still easier ways and the presence of the 'purchase link' would make it even more palatable to the RIAA.

Anyway, I think it's a cool idea and will be sending feedback about it shortly unless anyone has anything interesting to add.

kman
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 14, 2003, 05:25 PM
 
I wouldn't be surprised if they had this in mind, but decided not to do it after the whole internet sharing fiasco came about.

It's a shame, it would be a very cool feature.

John
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: In my tree making cookies
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 14, 2003, 08:49 PM
 
The presence of a cash register hasn't stopped people from shoplifting, thus, along with the itunes sharing fiasco, there is no way the RIAA would ever approve of this.
     
kman42  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 14, 2003, 09:20 PM
 
Originally posted by Nebrie:
The presence of a cash register hasn't stopped people from shoplifting, thus, along with the itunes sharing fiasco, there is no way the RIAA would ever approve of this.
Could you be a bit more detailed in your rebuffing of the idea?

I see some major differences between this idea and the 'streaming fiasco':

1) This would require both participants to be present. The streamer would have to initiate the stream, as in "Hey, take a listen to this song" [drag file onto Buddy's name and be prompted with "This is an audio file, would you like to stream it or transfer the file?"]. The 'streaming fiasco' was really designed for owners to have unlimited access to their own music, i.e. you could start a stream remotely and you could just let a playlist run. Using iChat to let your friend sample a song would be simple enough for this purpose, but difficult enough that no one would want to sit there and play an album in this fashion. It wouldn't be a practical way to SHARE music, but to sample it.

2) People can already use iChat to transfer files, so this isn't simplifying the transfer of unprotected MP3s in anyway, unlike the 'streaming fiasco'.

3) This integration would in no way allow for theft of copyright unless the recipient went to the trouble of running stream ripping software, but even then they would only be able to capture one song at a time with a loss of data and there are much easier (and higher quality) ways to go about it if your desire is stealing it to begin with. The presence of the cash-register is, therefore, not a deterrent to theft (as you suggested), but an OPPORTUNITY for easily sampling and then purchasing a song.

I grant you that the RIAA may have some knee-jerk reaction to something like this, but if you actually think about it for a minute there really isn't anything for them to be upset about. It's really a win-win situation for them. It's analogous to me listening to a song over at your house and then buying it.

kman

Sorry, didn't mean to misquote you. I should have written 'sharing fiasco' instead of 'streaming fiasco', but we all know we I was referring to.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 14, 2003, 09:59 PM
 
I for one agree. The argument that you could easily transfer the actual MP3 via iChat is a good one. Being able to open a stream wouldn't be nearly as bad.

I still stick to what I said earlier that I bet Apple had planned to offer this feature, but changed their minds. It makes perfect sense.

John
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Aiken, South Carolina, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 14, 2003, 10:19 PM
 
I wouldn't be surprised if a shareware/freeware developer made a solution for this
Apple II GS | Powerbook 165 | iMac Rev. A 96mb RAM| iBook G3 500mhz, 128mb RAM | Power Macintosh G5 1.6ghz, 2.25gb RAM | Black MacBook 2ghz, 2gb RAM | iPhone Rev. A 8gb HD
     
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: California - Bay Area
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 15, 2003, 09:58 AM
 
Originally posted by kman42:
[drag file onto Buddy's name and be prompted with "This is an audio file, would you like to stream it or transfer the file?"]
It's that "or transfer the file?" part where the red flags start to get thrown about.

If iTunes could downsample the song on the fly, the service would be far more practical from a bandwidth standpoint. Plus, it would make it less enticing to use for piracy -- who wants a 56K mono version of a song to be their "golden master?"

Not like I've been wanting this for years or anything.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: aurora
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 15, 2003, 10:17 AM
 
wouldn't it be easier if you were playing itunes in the background and the person on the other side could hear it?

pc users would have to wait for iTMS and the video support anyway so they wouldn't be able to copy the music, thus the sample.

mac users could use rendevous to trade files but not copy them.

ruff
     
kman42  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Francisco
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 15, 2003, 11:10 AM
 
Originally posted by SomeToast:
It's that "or transfer the file?" part where the red flags start to get thrown about.
But you can transfer files right now by dragging them to your Buddy's name! There is no added incentive for piracy here. And if the file was purchased from the iTMS, your friend can't use it anyway.

If iTunes could downsample the song on the fly, the service would be far more practical from a bandwidth standpoint. Plus, it would make it less enticing to use for piracy -- who wants a 56K mono version of a song to be their "golden master?"
While I think it's a good idea for iChat to use the most appropriate sample rate for the connection speed, I don't think it is necessary to downsample the song to prevent piracy, since any self-respecting pirate who was knowledgeable enough to get stream ripping software would just download the song from a P2P network and get the highest quality possible.

kman
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2