Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Big cat names are here to stay

View Poll Results: Do you like the Big Cat names and should we keep them?
Poll Options:
Yes, they're fun. 27 votes (93.10%)
No, they're a waste of time! 2 votes (6.90%)
Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll
Big cat names are here to stay
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 01:39 PM
 
Looks like we're sticking with the big cat names for a while then:

http://macuser.pcpro.co.uk/?http://w...y.php?id=45389

I don't see how they're going to get away with "lynx" though seeing as that's already an application name.
ClamXav - the free virus scanner for Mac OS X | Geobunny learns to fly
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: New York, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 01:48 PM
 
how 'bout an option for "it doesn't matter either way." I don't see a lot of time being wasted on them, but I don't think they're any more/less fun than other naming schemes they might come up with.

(last week's As the Apple Turns poll on possible alternative naming schemes was better - I personally favored the option of naming them after tropical diseases: Mac OS X Malaria or Mac OS X Ebola would kick ass)
cpac
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: New York City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 01:52 PM
 
Sure, they're kinda cool. But, yeah, it doesn't really matter either way. Apple only started using the "code names" for marketing with Jaguar. They didn't use Cheetah or Puma for anything with 10.0 and 10.1
     
Xeo
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Austin, MN, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 02:37 PM
 
Originally posted by zachs:
Apple only started using the "code names" for marketing with Jaguar. They didn't use Cheetah or Puma for anything with 10.0 and 10.1
I'd prefer them to just use the version number instead of code name. Code names have always been for internal use and now they are marketing them. Jag was cool 'cause they did the rendered fur, and it's grown on me as the name for 10.2, but I think it'd be better to just stick w/ version numbers.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: NY, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 03:37 PM
 
As a total big cat fan, obsessed lunatic, and crazed addict (who watches Big Cat Diary tirelessly into the wee hours) -- I'm perfectly happy with said nomenclature. Keep 'em comin'.
- Sahara
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Provo, UT
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 03:57 PM
 
Here's hoping that dogs will get there day when the next big iteration comes along. (i.e. what's beyond OSX - OSXI or whatever)

I vote we call it wolf. It'll be the fully 64bit OS with full BeOS like metadata, an integrated SQL database, and so forth.

OSXI 11.1 will be named Pit Bull
OSXI 11.2 will be named Razorback

and so forth. . .
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Denville, NJ.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 06:48 PM
 
One name's as good as another, as long as we stay in a particular family. Big cats, fine. Just don't start using lizard names in the middle of the series.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 06:48 PM
 
I think the cat names are cool. "Jaguar" and "Panther" sound much less techie and more mass-marketable than "system 10.2.6." Besides, as Steve showed in his WWDC keynote, Panther kicks Longhorn's ass

I just hope they don't run out of "cool" cat names. Imagine Mac OS X 10.8: Hello Kitty Edition!
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Trapped in the depths of my mind
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 08:31 PM
 
Originally posted by SupahCoolX:
...I just hope they don't run out of "cool" cat names. Imagine Mac OS X 10.8: Hello Kitty Edition!
Hehehehe. I like it!
     
dru
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2003, 08:41 PM
 
Originally posted by Geobunny:
Looks like we're sticking with the big cat names for a while then:

http://macuser.pcpro.co.uk/?<a href=...p?id=45389</a>

I don't see how they're going to get away with "lynx" though seeing as that's already an application name.
Does that make a "kernel panic" into a "hair ball"?
20" iMac C2D/2.4GHz 3GB RAM 10.6.8 (10H549)
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:25 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2