 |
 |
Secure Delete.. once, or 7, or 35?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Evansville, IN
Status:
Offline
|
|
First up, how does writing over a file more than once make it any more difficult to recover? I assumed that once you wrote over a file once the bits underneath would be scambled enough.
Second, why are the options: once, 7 and 35 times? I mean, what kind of logic comes up with those awkward numbers?
By the way, I'm not complaining here. I'm looking forward to this feature. It just seems totally bizarre to me.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Supposedly, with only a single pass or a few passes, there could still be a magnetic residue of the previous data on the surface of the drive. Theoretically, someone, such as the FBI, could still recover the data from the drive.
As for why the increments used in the number of passes are the way they are, I don't know.
|
|
Vandelay Industries
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think 35 is what the government requires.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
By the time you're getting that paranoid, I think that you want a metal shredder.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Powerbook 12" 640MB 60GB AirportExteme Canon 10D and my good looks 8^D
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I hear they might add another option to overwrite a file 105 times, but that isn't confirmed yet.
-
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would imagine that this could be a pref easily hacked by a company like Unsanity.
Maybe we'll see a little app from them later this year, (if enough people request it).
|
|
MBP 1.83 GHz CD/iPod 30GB
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Elbonia
Status:
Offline
|
|
i tried the 35 pass once, and it took forever. or maybe it was a bug. hmmm should try it again.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I have been wondering - please answer this question if you can - is, with FileVault why do you need secure delete at all? Even if somebody would 'undelete' a file that has been simply deleted, it would be useless since the contents is encrypted.
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by 7Macfreak:
i tried the 35 pass once, and it took forever. or maybe it was a bug. hmmm should try it again.
Of course it took forever. It overwrote it 35 times. What do you expect?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Edmond, OK USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Angus_D:
Of course it took forever. It overwrote it 35 times. What do you expect?
It depends on how big the file is. Overwriting a 100k file 35 times should not be noticeable (or at most barely).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Edmond, OK USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Developer:
What I have been wondering - please answer this question if you can - is, with FileVault why do you need secure delete at all? Even if somebody would 'undelete' a file that has been simply deleted, it would be useless since the contents is encrypted.
Because anyone logged into your account could still access it. If you have a shared machine with one account (auto-login), or had a compromised account then file-vault doesn't help if someone has access to the machine (since the contents would be magically decrypted on demand).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Edmond, OK USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Art Vandelay:
Theoretically, someone, such as the FBI, could still recover the data from the drive.
More than likely it would be the NSA doing this sort of work.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
BTW in 7B28 the options are gone.
Just "Empty Trash" and "Secure Empty Trash" options are there.
No more 4, 32, etc.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, EspaƱa
Status:
Offline
|
|
WHAT!
I want my 35 passes!!!!!
|
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|