 |
 |
10.3.5 Wishlist
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Already on my list:
1. metadata based fs
2. more control over interface (system fonts control, finder icons spacing, more dock options).
3 . more exposé options (use minimized windows and hidden windows)
4. more human friendly sharing including sharing of individual folders, sharing of libraries across users on a single machine, and so on.
5. yet more speed especially in iapps like iphoto and ical which are obnoxiously slow even on my G5.
6. aliases for shared network computers.
7. smarter handling of shared computers (right now for example if one goes out of range the connected computer locks up for way too long)
8. Consistent interfaces between iapps for editing metadata (for example one should be able to edit multiple data items in iphoto just as you can in itunes)
9. Dock improvements
10. More refinements to the default theme (scrollbars need an overhaul in my opinion).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: columbus, oh
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
"Another classic science-fiction show cancelled before its time" ~ Bender
15.2" PowerBook 1.25GHz, 80GB HD, 768MB RAM, SuperDrive
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just want it to make me coffee in the morning and clean my house while I'm away.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd like to be able to define a list if "Trusted Users" who could switch to my account without having to know my password (they'd just have to enter their own username/password). High risk, low security, I know, but in a family/home situation, it would be very useful for fast user switching.
Lets face it, "sudo" work in a similar way, and allows "root" access. So it's certainly no worse than that.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Terri:
I just want it to make me coffee in the morning and clean my house while I'm away.
While we're at it, don't forget about world peace 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
10.3.5 will never exist, it was announced today actually that the Mac OS will only reach 10.3.2.2.1 and then cease to exist....
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Not true.
10.3.5 will actually run on Intel hardware plus most new lawn and garden equipment.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Terri:
Not true.
10.3.5 will actually run on Intel hardware plus most new lawn and garden equipment.
Crap, you are right....I missed the "Oh yeah, one more thing...." part of the keynote...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
i heard a rumor that we're going back to OS 8.6 after the new year. hope you kept your old disks, otherwise you'll have to fork out some dough!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by vancenase:
i heard a rumor that we're going back to OS 8.6 after the new year. hope you kept your old disks, otherwise you'll have to fork out some dough!
Now THAT would be snappy on a 2 GHz G5!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
