Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Finder behaviour different after search

Finder behaviour different after search
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2004, 05:34 AM
 
After using the live search facility of a finder window to narrow down the list of files displayed, I find that certain finder operations are disabled (e.g. duplicate). Basically, once the search has been performed, the finder window containing the results no longer behaves in exactly the same way as a normal finder window. Is this a bug or a feature? Either way it is very annoying. Why are certain operations not allowed in a search-results window?

Panther 10.3.3

Cheers

Rich
What? There's an on switch on the printer?
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2004, 06:01 AM
 
It is a feature. The search result window isn't a real window and only contains links to the files. Different rules must apply to that window because a normal window displays the contents of one folder in a path.

Annoying? A little, I don't like Finder inconsistancies either. The search result window should look obviously different from a normal Finder window.

Chalk it up to yet another Finder UI hiccup.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2004, 06:14 AM
 
Originally posted by voodoo:
The search result window isn't a real window and only contains links to the files.
Actually it is a real window. As real as a window can get. It doesn't represent a folder however. Features that apply to a folder but not to a search result list are disabled. The path popup would be an obvious example. The search result has no place in the file system, so it has no path. Why Duplicate is amongst the disabled features I can not tell for sure, but Apple probably had its reasons.
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2004, 06:27 AM
 
Originally posted by Developer:
Actually it is a real window. As real as a window can get. It doesn't represent a folder however. Features that apply to a folder but not to a search result list are disabled. The path popup would be an obvious example. The search result has no place in the file system, so it has no path. Why Duplicate is amongst the disabled features I can not tell for sure, but Apple probably had its reasons.
Nope it isn't a real window. A real window has multiple view options, represents the contents of one folder and you can access all Finder functions in a window.

Whatever it is it most certainly is NOT a real window.
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: united states empire
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2004, 09:09 AM
 
Certain operations are not allowed in a search results window because of this : were you to duplicate a file...the new file may or may not fit the search criteria that you used to 'create' the results window. Therefore, it might just disappear, were this feature enabled. Also...where would the finder store this new duplicate file? As you are not "in a folder", it'd really have no clue where to put it. Luckily, it's pretty easy to get to a 'real' folder containing one of the search results, so I don't see it as a problem.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2004, 10:37 AM
 
Originally posted by lenox:
Certain operations are not allowed in a search results window because of this : were you to duplicate a file...the new file may or may not fit the search criteria that you used to 'create' the results window. Therefore, it might just disappear, were this feature enabled. Also...where would the finder store this new duplicate file? As you are not "in a folder", it'd really have no clue where to put it. Luckily, it's pretty easy to get to a 'real' folder containing one of the search results, so I don't see it as a problem.
Surely if the file is a duplicate, then it would have to fit the search criteria you entered for the original file, as the name of the file is the same, but with the word 'copy' added.

I agree that there might be some confusion as to where the duplicate would be made, if the search brought up different files from lots of different locations. However, if you have the search set to only search in the current selection it wouldn't harm for duplication of files to be allowed. I would like to see that added, as I often use the search facility in this way to limit the files displayed in the current folder (a little like typing ls *.dat in the terminal to only see those files with the .dat extension).

How do you get a real folder showing only the search results?

Cheers

Rich
What? There's an on switch on the printer?
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Seattle
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2004, 11:44 AM
 
Originally posted by lenox:
Certain operations are not allowed in a search results window because of this : were you to duplicate a file...the new file may or may not fit the search criteria that you used to 'create' the results window. Therefore, it might just disappear, were this feature enabled. Also...where would the finder store this new duplicate file? As you are not "in a folder", it'd really have no clue where to put it. Luckily, it's pretty easy to get to a 'real' folder containing one of the search results, so I don't see it as a problem.
I think it would be perfectly acceptable for a collection of files grouped by criteria to be displayed and operated on as files in a folder. Functions such as Path and duplicate are still valid, with the caveat that not all the files in the "folder" would have the same path. One could argue that the Path function is even more appropriate in this case where it is not obvious what folder the file may be in.

As far as duplicate goes, there is a default location in which all duplicate files go, which is in the same folder as the original. If the search criteria matched the duplicate it would show up in the search window by default. If not, it could be shown in a different color or otherwise flagged to indicate that it did not match but was created.

I think as time goes by and various OS's evolve, it will become less important where the files are located in a file system, the representations of which are an abstraction in any case. iPhoto is one fairly successful attempt at this.

What is imporant is being able to easily find what you need when you need it.
1.25GHz PowerBook


i vostri seni sono spettacolari
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2