Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Copying files to HD is REALLY, REALLY, SLOW...

Copying files to HD is REALLY, REALLY, SLOW...
Thread Tools
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jun 13, 2004, 06:30 PM
 
When I'm booted in classic, it works fine. But when I'm in Panther and try to copy files to my other HD, it only copies at about 10K/sec, sometimes slower. Any suggestions to fix this?

I've already tried reformatting, tried disk repair, and the HD passes SMART.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 13, 2004, 06:59 PM
 
Is this a FW HD? If so, it's probably got a bad FW controller chip.

Wade
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 13, 2004, 07:25 PM
 
What kind of hard drive is it?
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jun 13, 2004, 07:42 PM
 
23GB ATA IBM HD, it's loaded internal off my ATA bus.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 13, 2004, 10:17 PM
 
Wow. 10KB/sec is extremely slow, no matter what. What's the setup of your Mac? Which drive is internal and which is external (if ever)? Source and destination?

Are you familiar with the Terminal? How does it fare when copying files?
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 14, 2004, 08:04 AM
 
Are you sure that they're both configured correctly for master / slave?

Wade
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Bayonne, NJ USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 14, 2004, 10:09 AM
 
Do you have FileVault on?
Dan
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Jun 14, 2004, 05:14 PM
 
It's a Beige G3. I have the IBM in Slave mode with my CD-ROM in Master mode. FileVault is off. Terminal is just as slow, so is copying files over a network.

The file copying problem only happens in OS X, it works fine in Classic.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: :ИOITAↃO⅃
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 14, 2004, 05:23 PM
 
Sorry, your post just reminded me too much of this:

I don't want to start a holy war here, but what is the deal with you Mac fanatics? I've been sitting here at my freelance gig in front of a Mac (a 8600/300 w/64 Megs of RAM) for about 20 minutes now while it attempts to copy a 17 Meg file from one folder on the hard drive to another folder. 20 minutes. At home, on my Pentium Pro 200 running NT 4, which by all standards should be a lot slower than this Mac, the same operation would take about 2 minutes. If that.

In addition, during this file transfer, Netscape will not work. And everything else has ground to a halt. Even BBEdit Lite is straining to keep up as I type this.

I won't bore you with the laundry list of other problems that I've encountered while working on various Macs, but suffice it to say there have been many, not the least of which is I've never seen a Mac that has run faster than its Wintel counterpart, despite the Macs' faster chip architecture. My 486/66 with 8 megs of ram runs faster than this 300 mhz machine at times. From a productivity standpoint, I don't get how people can claim that the Macintosh is a superior machine.

Mac addicts, flame me if you'd like, but I'd rather hear some intelligent reasons why anyone would choose to use a Mac over other faster, cheaper, more stable systems.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 14, 2004, 11:36 PM
 
Originally posted by olePigeon:
It's a Beige G3. I have the IBM in Slave mode with my CD-ROM in Master mode.
I have had problems with IDE busses in this configuration on PCs in the past... You might try setting the HD to master and unplugging the CD-ROM and see if that improves matters any.

Oh, and the "freelance gig" troll was the first thing I thought of when I saw this topic, too.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2