Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > ActivityMonitor with dual processors: total = 200%?

ActivityMonitor with dual processors: total = 200%?
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 17, 2004, 05:13 PM
 
Hello

don't know if this is a hardware or software question, but will post here and see.

with a dual processor machine, mine is a dual g4 1gz, the activity monitor under "CPU" displayes on the bottom activity on two chips, I think.

but in the upper box, under %cpu its unlcear what that is telling me, and if the total then should be 200% for two chips.

the reason I ask, is that I have an excellent TV card from Alchemy, and I use Sorensen3 for initial compression when DVRing RV shows. this takes up most of my CPU usagem and I have to be carefull what otgher programs I open atg the same time. or my archived sh0ow suffers.

some of this MAY be due to quicktime usage by the DVR program then making it diffuclt to share subroutines with other apps.

some apps don't cause a p[roblem, some do (iDVD) but from time to time Ive noticed that total cpu ususage is >100%, so thought Id ask is the total full usage with a dual 200%?

Im trying by trial and error to get a good DVR, but do some things while AlchemyDVR us running.

thanks rotut
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: San Jose, Ca
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 17, 2004, 05:35 PM
 
You are correct, and each processor gets 100 "percent" so if you have two processes that are each monopolizing a processor, you can get 200 "percent" usage. This is a bit weird at first, but you get used to it.

This sort of thing does make for difficulties in boxes with more than 4 processors... Of course at that level you are usually using better tools...
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Promised Land
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 17, 2004, 11:15 PM
 
Originally posted by larkost:
You are correct, and each processor gets 100 "percent" so if you have two processes that are each monopolizing a processor, you can get 200 "percent" usage. This is a bit weird at first, but you get used to it.

This sort of thing does make for difficulties in boxes with more than 4 processors... Of course at that level you are usually using better tools...
Yep. I used to admin HP-UX boxes with 4 cpu's, and even their costly management tool (Glance) reports 100% for each processor, so you could see 400% usage. This is normal in the Unix world. Solaris does the same thing.
G5 2.5 DP/2GB RAM/NVidia 6800 Ultra
PowerBook Al 1Ghz/768MB RAM
6gb Blue iPod Mini
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 18, 2004, 02:48 AM
 
Solaris does the same thing
Last time I checked (one minute ago), top on Solaris reports 100% when the whole machine is in use, regardless of the number of processors.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Arizona Bay
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 18, 2004, 06:51 AM
 
Originally posted by Richard Edgar:
Last time I checked (one minute ago), top on Solaris reports 100% when the whole machine is in use, regardless of the number of processors.
Because it's taking an average of both processors usage.
<some witty quote that identifies my originality as a person except for the fact everyone else does the same thing>
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 18, 2004, 07:12 AM
 
Because it's taking an average of both processors usage
Two points
  • I had worked that out. My intent was to provide further information/correction/comparison
  • What about the other 22 processors?
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: over yonder
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 18, 2004, 08:25 AM
 
Originally posted by Richard Edgar:
What about the other 22 processors?
Give them to me.
chown -R us:us yourbase

Dissent is not un-American.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:36 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2