Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Burning a CD and Master/Slave relationship

Burning a CD and Master/Slave relationship
Thread Tools
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Springfield, Oregon
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 15, 2004, 11:11 PM
 
Hello All,

A while ago I purchased a large capacity Hard drive. I just put it right in and it worked all nice and dandy, however, for about the same amount of time, I have had a lot of trouble burning a CD from both Toast and iTunes.
For some silly reason, I put all of the data on the old small master drive, and put the system on the new larger (faster) slave drive.

Would this cause the problems in burning? Should I transfer all of the system stuff to the smaller master and the data to the faster larger slave?

I am always getting those nasty burn under-run errors. This doesn't make sense to me as the data (mostly music) that I am trying to burn is coming from the faster slave drive.

If anyone could help, this would be sOooO nice!

R
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 16, 2004, 08:41 AM
 
"Master and slave" in IDE is one of the worst nomenclatures I've come across in computing. Master is in no way superior to slave. Think of it as "drive 1" and "drive 2". The only thing is that if you have only one drive, it must be the master -- you can't have just the slave. But other than that, the drives are complete equals.

I suppose it's possible that the old drive is really slow, and the CD burner really fast, but every CD burner made in the last 3 years or so uses buffer underrun protection, which makes underruns impossible.

Anyhow, this is in the wrong forum -- the Mac OS X forum is for discussing the Mac OS X operating system itself, NOT for discussing software and peripherals that run on it.

tooki
     
G0Ducks  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Springfield, Oregon
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 16, 2004, 02:01 PM
 
Originally posted by tooki:
"Master and slave" in IDE is one of the worst nomenclatures I've come across in computing. Master is in no way superior to slave. Think of it as "drive 1" and "drive 2". The only thing is that if you have only one drive, it must be the master -- you can't have just the slave. But other than that, the drives are complete equals.

I suppose it's possible that the old drive is really slow, and the CD burner really fast, but every CD burner made in the last 3 years or so uses buffer underrun protection, which makes underruns impossible.

Anyhow, this is in the wrong forum -- the Mac OS X forum is for discussing the Mac OS X operating system itself, NOT for discussing software and peripherals that run on it.

tooki
Ah... thanks. I think.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2