 |
 |
Tiger requires Serial # to Install
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I noticed that Tiger is available in a Family Pack (for 5 computer installs) or a Single Person version. If Tiger doesn't have a serial # preventing users from multiple installs, i would assume that nobody would spend the extra $100 to get the family pack.
These leads me to believe that Tiger will have a serial number and force people to purchase the Family Pack. Can anyone shed light on this?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Menands, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple has never required a serial number to install the OS and there has been no indication that Tiger will be any different. They've always assumed that most people will do the right thing, and those who buy the Family Pack are doing exactly that.
(Last edited by Ron Goodman; Apr 18, 2005 at 07:30 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Status:
Offline
|
|
You could buy a Panther family pack. No serial for Panther.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, King
Status:
Offline
|
|
The sames scenario is true for Panther, and it is not serialized.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: in front of the keyboard
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's called honesty.
A foreign concept to many--I'm sure.
|
|
signatures are a waste of bandwidth
especially ones with political tripe in them.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kristoff
It's called honesty.
A foreign concept to many--I'm sure.
Or, more cynically, since you need Apple hardware to run their OS, they don't have much to lose if someone installs their copy on more than one machine. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
If Tiger doesn't have a serial # preventing users from multiple installs, i would assume that nobody would spend the extra $100 to get the family pack.
Those of us who are honest would.
Or, more cynically, since you need Apple hardware to run their OS, they don't have much to lose if someone installs their copy on more than one machine.
Well, they sold 1 million Mac last quarter. Let's assume that 25% of those were second machines.
Gosh you're right - they would only stand to lose $32.25 million.
Wade
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by wadesworld
Well, they sold 1 million Mac last quarter. Let's assume that 25% of those were second machines.
Gosh you're right - they would only stand to lose $32.25 million.
Wade
My point is, you're already locked into the Apple Experience™ whether you purchase a legitimate license for the software or not. That means you're much more likely to buy more expensive products (with higher profit margins) later on. By being both a hardware and a software company (and by making their software work only with their hardware), Apple doesn't experience the same kinds of pressures that Microsoft does when determining whether or not to serial-protect the OS.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outfield - #24
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, there are some quality new people around.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere, but not here.
Status:
Offline
|
|
hasn't this whole topic been beaten to death a thousand times over already?
and to the original poster - perhaps your thread title should have had a ? at the end instead of making it look like you are stating a fact.
|
|
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity...
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by wadesworld
Those of us who are honest would.
Well, they sold 1 million Mac last quarter. Let's assume that 25% of those were second machines.
Gosh you're right - they would only stand to lose $32.25 million.
Wade

|

Mac Mini : 1.66 Core Duo : 2 GB ♥
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Topic is misleading. Does anyone use a question mark anymore?
Mike
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY²
Status:
Offline
|
|
if you are not going to bother buying the 5 pack and saving yourself $100, why not save yourself another $129 and download tiger?
let's play hangman.
i'll go first and make it easy.
h_nesty
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Houston, Texas
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Reggie Fowler
I noticed that Tiger is available in a Family Pack (for 5 computer installs) or a Single Person version. If Tiger doesn't have a serial # preventing users from multiple installs, i would assume that nobody would spend the extra $100 to get the family pack.
You know what happens when you assume don't you? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by starman
Topic is misleading. Does anyone use a question mark anymore.
Fixed? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Washington DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 5 user copy and the 1 user copy are the exact same disk. The only difference is the paperwork and the 5-user sticker on the box.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by starman
Topic is misleading. Does anyone use a question mark anymore?
Mike
Seconded. Damn n00bs. There is already a thread discussing this.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New York City, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mdc
if you are not going to bother buying the 5 pack and saving yourself $100, why not save yourself another $129 and download tiger?
let's play hangman.
i'll go first and make it easy.
h_nesty
i was thinking about that? why settle for saving ONLY 70 dollars when you can save another 129?!?!?
|
|
iamwhor3hay
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Please use the other thread.
|
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|