 |
 |
Tiger on Older G4/G3s - Experiences?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Like many of you, I'm looking forward to installing Tiger some time in the next few weeks. However, as the owner of an unaccelerated G4/400 Sawtooth I'm interested to see how I'll hold up under the new system. I've upgraded my memory, hdd and vid to a flashed GF2 (so I can run QE in Jag). Apart from occasional pokiness it's more than adequate for surfing/iphoto/itunes etc... In fact, I often prefer it to my 1.8ghz P4 work laptop.
For those of you who are running Tiger on older (for the sake of argument, let's say G3 or G4 at <800mhz) or even "unsupport" (non-FW) machines, how are things working out? Has the upgrade increased or decreased your system's usability? Any suggestions for optimizing Tiger on your "ancient" hardware (apart from the usual memory/vid/accelerator suggestions)? Do you prefer Tiger to Jag?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Dual 500 G4 graphite here at work (test machine). No problems.
Mike
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I placed Tiger on a first generation TiBook G4-400 and it is running fine for me. Starts up faster, login is faster, spotlight works fine, so does dashboard. System responsiveness is slightly better than 10.3. Overall, a better experience.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by PubGuy
Well, I placed Tiger on a first generation TiBook G4-400 and it is running fine for me. Starts up faster, login is faster, spotlight works fine, so does dashboard. System responsiveness is slightly better than 10.3. Overall, a better experience.
Same here. Powerbook G4/500, 756RAM. Especially boot times. Of course, we don't have any "ripple" effects with dashboard...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
single 450 mhz sawtooth. 640 mb of ram. runs better than 9.2 did IMO
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|