Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Tiger or Panther on a Cube 450 MHz?

Tiger or Panther on a Cube 450 MHz?
Thread Tools
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 13, 2005, 11:54 AM
 
I've got a Cube 450 MHz with 256 MB ram and I am not sure whether or not to stay with Panther or upgrade to Tiger. I am not interested in putting any additional ram in it, so given its current configuration, which would be the better choice? Tiger's ram requirements are obviously higher than Panther's, but would the upgrade to Tiger bring an "overall" improvement on the Cube?
17" MacBook Pro 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | 320G HD | 4 GB RAM | 10.7
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Waterbury CT
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 13, 2005, 01:28 PM
 
dunno, i wouldnt recommend running panther with so little ram even, lol. i had 768mb in my single 450 powermac and that got sluggish
iMac G5 1.8 ghz 20in. 1.5 gigs RAM, 250 gig Harddrive, Fully Wireless
60 Gig Original Overpriced iPod photo
Power Mac G4 450 768 Megs RAM
5 Gig Original iPod (RIP 12-20-04) :(
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 13, 2005, 02:09 PM
 
Add more RAM and you'll be fine. But it won't magically double the speed, although it will be faster than Panther.

Even since 10.1, the RAM requirement should have been 512 MB.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 02:49 AM
 
hmm tough question. i have a 450 mhz sawtooth with 640 mb of ram and it runs better than 9.2 did honestly. but i think it primarily because of the ram
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 09:03 AM
 
i've got 640Mb in my 450Mhz Cube and Tiger is purring nicely.
     
Buck_W  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 01:36 PM
 
I appreciate the responses. I guess my specific question would be, which OS (Panther or Tiger) would run the best with ONLY my current amount of RAM (256MB)? Or would it be so close that it would be a toss up?
17" MacBook Pro 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | 320G HD | 4 GB RAM | 10.7
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 01:49 PM
 
I'm not sure the RAM requirements for Tiger are much greater than Panther. I think they just finally admitted it.

That said, I haven't seen Tiger on such a machine, so I can't say from experience. I do know it provided a very nice boost in many areas for my PowerBook. I doubt it would actually hurt your speed.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 02:35 PM
 
No, I think the RAM requirements are about the same. Which means: I would recommend 512+ MB for either Panter or Tiger.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 06:49 PM
 
Your best choice is to get a 512 memory upgrade for $90 and forget about Tiger. Your memory is the limiting factor of your system, not the OS.
     
Buck_W  (op)
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 06:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by jmiddel
Your best choice is to get a 512 memory upgrade for $90 and forget about Tiger. Your memory is the limiting factor of your system, not the OS.
So from your experience, Tiger does require more memory than Panther?
17" MacBook Pro 2.66 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | 320G HD | 4 GB RAM | 10.7
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 14, 2005, 07:11 PM
 
No, Tiger does not, but, if you want to speed up your system and make everything work smoother, Panther with 768 ram will be faster than Tiger with 256ram
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 15, 2005, 04:13 AM
 
Originally Posted by Buck_W
So from your experience, Tiger does require more memory than Panther?
It runs fine on a system with 512 MB. Ditto for Panther, so no. But from experience I can tell you, 256 MB are not enough. I'd rather keep Panther and upgrade the RAM than the other way around. Ideally, you'd upgrade both
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:38 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2