 |
 |
Memory- Wired, Active, Inactive, Free
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just curious about the categories that the Activity Monitor has for memory. I'm assuming that 'Wired' memory is used by the OS, 'Active' is used by the open apps, and 'Free' is completely unused memory. True? If so, then what is 'Inactive' memory?
Thanks, Andy
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
My guess is that "incative" memory is sytem cache, but I'm not 100% sure on that.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Memory that's holding old stuff so that if you reopen it, it'll be faster. Ideally you'll have lots of inactive memory and very little free 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
When Activity Monitor is showing CPU performance, what does it mean by 'Nice?'
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by adios
When Activity Monitor is showing CPU performance, what does it mean by 'Nice?'
Open the terminal and type "man nice"
nice -- execute a utility with an altered scheduling priority
|
|
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz 2GB 120GB OSX 10.4.9, Boot Camp 1.2, Vista Home Premium
mac mini 1.42, 60GB 7200rpm, 1GB (sold), dual 2GHz/G5 (sold), Powerbook 15" 1GHz (sold)
dual G4 800MHz (sold), dual G4 450MHz (sold), G4 450MHz (sold), Powerbook Pismo G3 500MHz (sold)
PowerMac 9500 132MHz 601, dual 180MHz 604e, Newer G3 400MHz (in closet)
Powermac 7100 80MHz (sold), Powermac 7100 66MHz (sold)
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm still not sure how a percentage of its CPU usage can be nice, though. It could mean it took that percentage from another application due (due to its nice level), it yielded that much to another application (due to its nice level) or something else entirely. It seems a little ambiguous to me, and I haven't found the Google terms to figure out which it is.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here is an excerpt from http://www.desertsol.com/~kevin/free/
- - - - -
Summary of the terms "wired", "active", "inactive", "used", "free", excerpted from the link above:
Wired = memory allocated that shouldn't/can't be swapped/paged out (ie its locked into memory -- possibly portions of the OS code for example).
Active = allocated memory that has been accessed during last N seconds.
Inactive = allocated memory that hasn't been accessed during last N Secs (quite likely to be first candidates for being swapped/paged out if memory being demanded). [I always think of Inactive memory as the memory used by caches]
Used = Wired + Active + Inactive
Free = memory that isn't allocated to any process or the kernel.
- - - - - -
Andrea
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Málaga, Spain, Europe, Earth, Solar System
Status:
Offline
|
|
Other nice definition of free memory for Mac OS X is "wasted memory". And it's true, indeed it is.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wired memory contains code which can't be paged out to disk, no matter how recently it has been used. The most common code to be "wired" like this is the virtual-memory subsystem, because if you paged this out to disk you wouldn't be able to get it back into memory. Sometimes other portions of the OS will be put here, though. Memory which contains password information (such as storing the password which the user just typed in) should ideally be wired, so that it won't be written to disk if the system needs to page some things out.
Wired memory is necessary in some situations, so you're never going to get it down to zero. However, it does come at a price, because it means that less memory is available for paging in and out. In general, you don't want to have a lot of wired memory; only things that have to be wired should be.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Northamptonshire UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
With regards to Page Ins/Outs, what is a "good" level of paging in & out.
For example Activity Monitor currently tells me that I have 54449 Page Ins and 22140 Page Outs. Free Memory stands at 6.25MB. I have open five applications (Activity Monitor, Route 66, Safari, Mail and iTunes) which is quite typical.
My computer is an iBook 500Mhz with 384MB RAM and X 10.3.9
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Long Beach, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Strix
With regards to Page Ins/Outs, what is a "good" level of paging in & out.
For example Activity Monitor currently tells me that I have 54449 Page Ins and 22140 Page Outs. Free Memory stands at 6.25MB. I have open five applications (Activity Monitor, Route 66, Safari, Mail and iTunes) which is quite typical.
My computer is an iBook 500Mhz with 384MB RAM and X 10.3.9
One page is 4kB, so how good or bad that is depends entirely on how long your machine has been on. 22k pages is less than 100MB. If your machine has been up for a half an hour, this is bad. If it's been running for a week, this is good. Ideally, you would have enough RAM that you would NEVER have pageouts. BTW, you can't avoid pageins, as these occur when you open an application. However, you will have MORE pageins as your pageouts increase.
|

ACSA 10.4/10.3, ACTC 10.3, ACHDS 10.3
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ideally, you want as few pageins/pageouts as possible, but the important thing is not to have so many that your hard drive shows huge amounts of activity while things slow to a crawl. When this happens, the hard drive is said to be thrashing, and it's not a good situation to be in: not technically harmful, but very annoying.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|