Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > memory managing on osx

memory managing on osx
Thread Tools
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 12:36 AM
 
hi all

a question: in os9 and earlier all of us would have spent some time tweeking with virtual memory.

am i right in thinking that there is no easy manager of memory in osx?

i seem to remember way back when osx was introduced that there was some conversation on it going bye bye...and the memory 'self managing'.

sorry being a bit vague but if somebody knows more that would be great!
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 12:45 AM
 
Virtual memory in OS 9 was tacked on and not really very good. OS X has intelligent memory management built into the kernel. Handling memory the awful way OS 9 did is not even an option.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 01:00 AM
 
mmm, ta

i sorta thought that was the case, though on virtual memory it was nice to be able to individually tweek when the case arrived...

the reason i ask is i was having a toast issue that i had been posting questions in the applications threads. part of my issue has been toast telling me it had not enough memory to complete a burn. so it seemed logical to define if i actually could divert memory to specific apps.

ta
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 01:06 AM
 
If it doesn't have enough memory in OS X, I doubt it would have in OS 9 either. OS X's memory management is at least no worse than OS 9's. You couldn't really "divert memory to specific apps" in OS 9, per se. You could quit all your apps and then run just one with a high memory allocation, but you can quit all your apps in OS X too.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 02:36 AM
 
On the Toast issue...two questions:

You *are* using an OS X-native version of Toast, yes? Classic versions cannot possibly work.

How much free space do you have on your hard drive?
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 06:20 AM
 
6.0.9 version with about 100gb of free space and 512 ram, that's whay i've found it odd (and why i was thinking of the ol' memory management...).

odd!

ta
     
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Málaga, Spain, Europe, Earth, Solar System
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 08:04 AM
 
More probably is that Toast is warning about low cache memory of the burner. Check out those at the preferences dialog if I recall correctly.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 08:12 AM
 
Originally Posted by atomised
6.0.9 version with about 100gb of free space and 512 ram, that's whay i've found it odd (and why i was thinking of the ol' memory management...).

odd!

ta
To be certain, you're not dealing with a virtual memory issue. OS X knows memory management, fo' sho. Memory allocation in the classic Mac OS was its third worst attribute (behind the lack of protected memory and preemptive multitasking), and at select moments, it was the worst aspect of the classic OS.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Columbus, OH
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 12:19 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit
... OS X's memory management is at least no worse than OS 9's....
You are kidding, right?
HyperNova Software, LLC
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: melbourne, australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 28, 2005, 07:37 PM
 
Originally Posted by eevyl
More probably is that Toast is warning about low cache memory of the burner. Check out those at the preferences dialog if I recall correctly.

hmmm, not so sure. i have gone into the toast preferences a couple of times but have seen nothing of cache etc...

if you know where they are that would be great as its driving me crazy!
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:27 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2