Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > What's up with OSX and big files?

What's up with OSX and big files?
Thread Tools
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Athens, Greece
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 01:04 AM
 
After updating to tiger my system has developed a few irritating problems.
Navigating through big files (300MB and bigger) in the finder is a pure nightmare. It hangs for a few seconds after going to the next file. 500MB plus files just make the finder hang for a minute or two and sometimes make it compeletely crash!! Previewing Photoshop files in the finder is impossible whereas before you could quickly scan the file you wanted even with huge files. Reason the music program is unuasable because of that. As most of you will know reason installs some 600MB samples on your hard drive necessary for it to work. When the program needs to access this file and preview it the systems hangs. Now the only way around it is to use the 2cds provided with the program wich is quite uncomfortable.
And the other very strange problem is in renaming files. If you're in column mode and rename a file or a folder it takes a second to process the change and relocate the file to the appropriate place.
So any ideas what has changed with Tiger? Or is this a badly installed version on my machine?

I have OSX 10.4.1 on a 667DVI powerbook with 512MB of ram.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 05:11 AM
 
512 of ram.

This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
     
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 08:57 AM
 
Agreed, upgrade to a full GB of RAM and you'll see a lot less slowdowns.

tooki
     
phobos  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Athens, Greece
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 09:49 AM
 
You guys are not serious right?
Do you believe that I need 1GB of ram to make finder previewing in column view faster? That's impossible.
You know that it doesn't actually read the whole file to display the preview image. It's a small icon that's been saved along with the image in the saving process. So something else is going on there.

What about the file renaming issue? Do I need 1GB of ram as well??? Please....
     
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: State of Denial
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 10:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by phobos
It's a small icon that's been saved along with the image in the saving process.
Not necessarily. That's only the case for certain formats with, for example, a saved resource fork or EXIF data. For something like an EXIF-less JPEG, yes, it reads the entire file. I'm not even sure that the Finder knows how to read the embedded thumbnails of all that many file formats, either.
[Wevah setPostCount:[Wevah postCount] + 1];
     
phobos  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Athens, Greece
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 11:50 AM
 
Even if what you say is true this wasn't an issue on the previous versions of OSX.
I can't understand what has changed in this version.

Now that I come to think of it the only thing that has changed on my part is the enabling of journaling. I'll disable it to see if the speed will change.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Seattle, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 11:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by phobos
What about the file renaming issue?
I noticed that too and I think it's a feature. Before when you renamed a folder it instantly disappeared from view and you couldn't see the effect of your changes. I assume they decided this was confusing to new users and added a delay.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LV-426
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 12:29 PM
 
Just use Icon view and List view. A lot of headaches regarding Column view are instantly out the window.

I do this and like it a lot. Haven't used column view since 10.1

cheers

W-Y

“Building Better Worlds”
     
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 08:21 PM
 
Column View is still there?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 08:41 PM
 
I thought so many loved column view. Ironically, it likely the main mode of Finder use I employ. In any event, there must certainly be something wrong with the OP's system, since I have neither heard of nor experienced such a problem. A RAM deficiency does not cause Finder hangs.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Polwaristan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 09:48 PM
 
I love column view
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 10:08 PM
 
It's slow because your computer is slow. You think rendering a multi-hundred-MB photoshop file will be fast on your machine? I've navigated through large files on my iBook 500 (multi-GB disk images, databases, etc.) without a problem, but previewing is another matter. I can't see how you expect your machine to handle stuff like that.

And update to 10.4.2.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 27, 2005, 10:10 PM
 
Originally Posted by phobos
Even if what you say is true this wasn't an issue on the previous versions of OSX.
I can't understand what has changed in this version.

Now that I come to think of it the only thing that has changed on my part is the enabling of journaling. I'll disable it to see if the speed will change.
Tiger wants more RAM than Panther did because it's doing a lot in the background that Panther didn't do. More RAM WILL make the whole OS faster, though you may not see all of the speed increase through the UI.
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 17, 2005, 12:17 AM
 
Originally Posted by phobos
So any ideas what has changed with Tiger? Or is this a badly installed version on my machine?

I have OSX 10.4.1 on a 667DVI powerbook with 512MB of ram.
I don't know what happened either, but I am seeing the same problem except with small files during a large copy, ie 2GB of 3-4 MB files. System hangs often. I have 1 GB RAM and never saw such junk with 10.3. I believe something bad has changed with Finder in 10.4.
G4 iMac
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 18, 2005, 10:06 AM
 
I have a powerbook G4 1.5ghz with 1 gig of RAM and suffer the same previewing problem (which includes large photoshop files crashing the entire system). Sorry that I don't have any advice... All I can say is that I doubt it's because of a slow system. My Photoshop is also a lot slower than it should be. I'm considering installing Tiger fresh and seeing what happens.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2