 |
 |
Very, Very Slow Finder Copy in 10.4.3
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai, UAE
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have 2 encrypted disk images of 5GB each. When copying a large file between them (700MB or so), my system slows down to the point of being unuseable. In 10.3.8 there was no noticeable performance hit.
I can't even drag windows while it is copying in 10.4.3. This is on a 1.67GHz AlBook.
What is going on with Tiger - I am very sorry I upgraded from Panther. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hmm. by your Panther comment, I take it that this was working better when you had Panther, the same operations?
I would assume that the I/O would be blocking a lot when that much data is being transferred, and all the encryption/decryption on files that big would also be very expensive in terms of CPU time.
Chris
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai, UAE
Status:
Offline
|
|
It was working much better in Panther - like any other finder copy.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Trygve
It was working much better in Panther - like any other finder copy.
Tiger is great! Nobody else has ANY problems with it, it must be something you're doing wrong. </sarcasm>
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why don't you boot from an external drive with Panther on it and verify that this operation still works well there before indicting Tiger.
|

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Or try doing the same thing on another Tiger install (or another user account on the same machine) and see if that makes a difference.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by cmeisenzahl
Hmm. by your Panther comment, I take it that this was working better when you had Panther, the same operations?
I would assume that the I/O would be blocking a lot when that much data is being transferred, and all the encryption/decryption on files that big would also be very expensive in terms of CPU time.
Chris
No, I do that all the time and it shouldn't slow the system to a crawl.
What it could be is if Spotlight is trying to index the drives at the time since it updates in real-time so maybe there is a problem there.
Check the Activity monitor and list by CPU usage to see what process uses most CPU during a copy. If something called mdimport or mds appear then that is most likely the problem. If so then drag the disk images to privacy in system prefs.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai, UAE
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have disabled Spotlist for my secure disk images with:
sudo mdutil -i off "/Volumes/MySecureDisk"
sudo mdutil -E "/Volumes/MySecureDisk"
It works fine under Pather (loaded on an external FireWire drive). it works fine with non-secure disk images too.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Dubai, UAE
Status:
Offline
|
|
During a normal copy FW to FW, kernaltask takes about 3%. During a copy between encrypted disk images on the same FW drives, kernal task takes 97%... this according to top in terminal.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|