Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Need help with a panic log

Need help with a panic log
Thread Tools
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 14, 2006, 03:54 PM
 
Here it is.

Tue Mar 14 14:37:50 2006
panic(cpu 0 caller 0x000E83F4): vnode_put(2a487bc): iocount < 1
Latest stack backtrace for cpu 0:
Backtrace:
0x00095718 0x00095C30 0x0002683C 0x000E83F4 0x000E83A0 0x000D4E18 0x002AA2E4 0x000ABEB0
0x44524546
Proceeding back via exception chain:
Exception state (sv=0x302C0280)
PC=0x9001C220; MSR=0x0000F030; DAR=0x0025B000; DSISR=0x42000000; LR=0x90B14D34; R1=0xF14258C0; XCP=0x00000030 (0xC00 - System call)

Kernel version:
Darwin Kernel Version 8.5.0: Sun Jan 22 10:38:46 PST 2006; root:xnu-792.6.61.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC
*********


that's it. No Kernel loadable modules in backtrace (with dependencies) line that I can check. Just that.

It's a dual 2.7 gHz Power Mac G5, running OS X Server 10.4.5 (haven't run the latest security update yet) with 1 gig of ram.

I was just in the Finder navigating to a file when I got the restart your machine message.

Apple File Service and Windows Service are running within Server, along with Photoshop CS2 and Frontier.

Attached to the machine via SCSI is a Medea Videoraid RTR (though I had a similar panic 2 weeks ago before I hooked up the raid.)

Can someone translate my log for me, please?

Thanks.
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 21, 2006, 05:00 AM
 
Hi, I'm getting this problem at a couple of sites. According to a colleague, it's a problem that affects dual processor machines.
We've been trying the following, from an Apple technote, with great success:

http://developer.apple.com/qa/qa2001/qa1141.html

Give it a go and let us know if it helps.

How often do you suffer these panics? We were seeing them every few minutes on one machine.

Stu
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 21, 2006, 05:06 AM
 
Disabling a processor isn't a very good fix.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 21, 2006, 06:14 AM
 
admitted, it's not the best solution but it's the only *workaround* that works other than compiling your own kernel with the patch to fix things permanently. Hopefully, Apple will fix this in 10.4.6.
s
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Oslo, Norway
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 06:44 AM
 
I just experienced this KP today (see machine specs in signature).
Code:
Tue Mar 28 13:44:37 2006 panic(cpu 0 caller 0x000E83F4): vnode_put(3106318): iocount < 1 Latest stack backtrace for cpu 0: Backtrace: 0x00095718 0x00095C30 0x0002683C 0x000E83F4 0x000E83A0 0x000D4E18 0x002AA2E4 0x000ABEB0 0x00000000 Proceeding back via exception chain: Exception state (sv=0x4609C780) PC=0x9001C220; MSR=0x0000F030; DAR=0x09822678; DSISR=0x40000000; LR=0x90B14D34; R1=0xF00FFA90; XCP=0x00000030 (0xC00 - System call) Kernel version: Darwin Kernel Version 8.5.0: Sun Jan 22 10:38:46 PST 2006; root:xnu-792.6.61.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC *********
I found the following in the Apple Mailing Lists. I think I will wait for Apple to release 10.4.6, before I try this, hehe
Originally Posted by Roman Zippel
If you can compile your own kernel, you can try the attached patch.
The problem is insufficient locking, so that hfs_getnewvnode() is
entered from two cpus and modification to the node are lost.
I sent this patch also to Apple, but so far there has been no reaction,
so I don't know if this will be fixed in 10.4.3.

bye, Roman
Code:
diff -pur xnu-792.2.4.org/bsd/hfs/hfs_vnops.c xnu-792.2.4/bsd/hfs/hfs_vnops.c --- xnu-792.2.4.org/bsd/hfs/hfs_vnops.c 2005-07-12 23:36:53.000000000 +0200 +++ xnu-792.2.4/bsd/hfs/hfs_vnops.c 2005-10-12 19:18:20.000000000 +0200 @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ hfs_vnop_getattr(struct vnop_getattr_arg enum vtype v_type; int error = 0; - if ((error = hfs_lock(VTOC(vp), HFS_SHARED_LOCK))) { + if ((error = hfs_lock(VTOC(vp), HFS_EXCLUSIVE_LOCK))) { return (error); } cp = VTOC(vp);
http://lists.apple.com/archives/darw.../msg00075.html
Power Mac G5 Dual 2.5GHz (June 2004), 2GB ram, 570GB HD, Radeon 9600XT 128MB, OS X 10.4.5
Aluminium 20-inch Cinema Display
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 10:23 AM
 
If this is a general dual-CPU issue, why aren't more of us experiencing it?

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 28, 2006, 12:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac
If this is a general dual-CPU issue, why aren't more of us experiencing it?
Threading issues are often highly irregular. I wouldn't be surprised if this is one of those things that's like "1% of the time, this certain disk operation will fail on dual processor machines".
     
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 29, 2006, 06:33 AM
 
I am facing the same problem also...It all started after I installed the OS 10.4.5, this is the second time and I dont know what to do?!
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2