Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > 1 Exabyte of RAM in a Mac?

1 Exabyte of RAM in a Mac?
Thread Tools
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 10:38 AM
 
This is an example of how forward thinking Apple is...they are already prepared for Macs with more than an exabyte of RAM!

The file /System/Library/CoreServices/Resources/English.lproj/AppleSystemInfo.strings contains instructions for formatting the machine configuration strings that are displayed in by "About This Mac..."

Here is some of the text:

//=========================================
// String used to format RAM description, when there is more than 1 GB of RAM.
//
// IMPORTANT: Make sure the right hand side value contains the substring "%.*f".
// "%.*f" will get replaced by the actual RAM in units of GB (e.g. "1.2").
//-------------------------------------------------------
"RAMInGB" = "%.*f GB";

//=========================================
// String used to format RAM description, when there is more than 1 TB of RAM.
//
// IMPORTANT: Make sure the right hand side value contains the substring "%.*f".
// "%.*f" will get replaced by the actual RAM in units of TB (e.g. "1.2").
//-------------------------------------------------------
"RAMInTB" = "%.*f TB";

//=========================================
// String used to format RAM description, when there is more than 1 PB of RAM.
//
// IMPORTANT: Make sure the right hand side value contains the substring "%.*f".
// "%.*f" will get replaced by the actual RAM in units of PB (e.g. "1.2").
//---------------------------------------------------------
"RAMInPB" = "%.*f PB";

//==========================================
// String used to format RAM description, when there is more than 1 EB of RAM.
//
// IMPORTANT: Make sure the right hand side value contains the substring "%.*f".
// "%.*f" will get replaced by the actual RAM in units of EB (e.g. "1.2").
//----------------------------------------------------------
"RAMInEB" = "%.*f EB";
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 10:40 AM
 
I hear CS 3 is quite demanding.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 01:38 PM
 
What? No Zettabytes (ZB) or Yottabytes (YB)?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 02:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
I hear CS 3 is quite demanding.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 02:19 PM
 
They've got Terabytes, Petabytes, and Exabytes?? What are they thinking?

Even a Terabyte is at LEAST a decade away.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 02:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by macgeek2005 View Post
They've got Terabytes, Petabytes, and Exabytes?? What are they thinking?

Even a Terabyte is at LEAST a decade away.
I don't know about that. The maximum RAM in a Mac Pro is now 16 GB — that's 10 times more than the capacity of a 2002 Power Mac — and people are already clamoring for more. I wouldn't be surprised to see setups with terabyte capacity within five years.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
chabig  (op)
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 03:05 PM
 
In the mid '80s, 1 megabyte was typical. In the mid '00s, 1GB was typical. I'd say we'll have a terabyte of RAM in the mid 2020s.

Still, I simply thought this was interesting.
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: eating kernel
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 03:38 PM
 
Steve must have a time machine and is sending OS X into the future to make sure MS looses
Signature depreciated.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Seattle, Washington
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 06:41 PM
 
Originally Posted by Person Man View Post
What? No Zettabytes (ZB) or Yottabytes (YB)?
Yodabytes?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 06:48 PM
 
Yodabytes
"Panic kernel Macintosh because restart have to."
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Earth
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 08:23 PM
 
There are some Sun servers that can handle 2TB of RAM, so I don't think PB or ZB would be that far away in the future...
MacBook Pro T2500/1.5GB/100GB/256MB  iPod 20GB B&W  Mac mini 1.25/256MB/40GB/32MB  Dell 2.66/2GB/80GB/Intel Extreme Gfx
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Home in front of my computer
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2007, 08:48 PM
 
Originally Posted by Sherman Homan View Post
Yodabytes
"Panic kernel Macintosh because restart have to."
"Kernel Panic occurred, it has. Restart computer now, we must."
     
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2007, 03:00 AM
 
Wow, imagine how many Pro apps you could have loading simultaneously!
     
chabig  (op)
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2007, 07:40 AM
 
Originally Posted by alainmeyer1 View Post
Wow, imagine how many Pro apps you could have loading simultaneously!
...or one instance of Microsoft Word.
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2007, 07:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by macgeek2005 View Post
They've got Terabytes, Petabytes, and Exabytes?? What are they thinking?

Even a Terabyte is at LEAST a decade away.
640 K ought to be enough for anybody.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2007, 08:56 AM
 
Originally Posted by C.A.T.S. CEO View Post
Steve must have a time machine and is sending OS X into the future to make sure MS looses
MS better tighten things up then!
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 25, 2007, 09:09 AM
 
Originally Posted by Sherman Homan View Post
Yodabytes
"Panic kernel Macintosh because restart have to."
Sounds more like Engrish.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:00 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2