 |
 |
Advanced features missing in OS X (Page 4)
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
A bit old, but the thread is still alive and I just noticed this: PDF is a vector-based format.
Correct. But MOST PDFs aren't editable.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
GUI artwork doesn't need to be editable.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
Correct. But MOST PDFs aren't editable.
While I can't speak for the entire PDF-using universe, I'm able to edit most PDFs I encounter.
|
|
Chuck
___
"If you mean time-traveling bunnies, then yes."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
all they have done is shove it under and caused people to ignore it.
I would like to see apple script finally have a useful GUI unlike that stupid automator which doesn't do any of the thins that most users would want to do!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by beez1717
all they have done is shove it under and caused people to ignore it.
I would like to see apple script finally have a useful GUI unlike that stupid automator which doesn't do any of the thins that most users would want to do!
Again, this coincides with your post in the 10.6 wishlist thread...
Applescript is a scripting language. You can't put a very useful GUI around something that fundamentally centers around text workflows - Applescript is not Photoshop. At the end of the day, you still need to understand and work with that text.
What you can do is Automate and provide just-add-water solutions for common Applescript uses, which is exactly what Automator is. Like you said, it is limited in its design. Once you leave this little bubble, you are on your own. No GUI will solve this basic dillema.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
GUI artwork doesn't need to be editable.
No, but that wasn't what I was talking about.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
While I can't speak for the entire PDF-using universe, I'm able to edit most PDFs I encounter.
Then the person didn't PDF it correctly. Like I encounter some I can edit in IE etc.
you should really turn all text into artwork before PDFing.
I send PDFs to customers for Proofs this way. Never had a bad one come back.
The point of a PDF is that you can't edit it. If I send a layout to someone, and I don't want them changing things (People will, believe me) I PDF it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
Then the person didn't PDF it correctly. Like I encounter some I can edit in IE etc ... you should really turn all text into artwork before PDFing.
God, no! You can lock a PDF without changing all the text into graphics.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes I know you can. But I like to. These are simply for email previews.
Most people that make PDFs in for example Office, have no clue what they are doing. And usually the PDF comes out looking like crap. And having fonts default all over the place.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
I still feel that PDfs are not being used to their full potential.
Why is it that every time I use one I know that it is almost always an insturction manual, or some sort of buisness document, or text (or a really bad example of what a PDF is)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Administrator 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by beez1717
I still feel that PDfs are not being used to their full potential.
Why is it that every time I use one I know that it is almost always an insturction manual, or some sort of buisness document, or text (or a really bad example of what a PDF is)
Those are PERFECT examples of what PDF is for. You can't easily change these manuals or documents, can you? So you have effectively an electronic printed page, rather than an easily edited document-and just think of the mischief that you could do if bids, proposals, contracts and such were sent out as Word documents! That's one of the great beauties of PDF-it allows you to share and protect content at the same time.
|
Glenn ----- THANKS FOR ALL THE SUPPORT! But the fight isn't done; click the picture to donate!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
I really hate the fact that Apple's Logic Studio uses a .pdf manual, rather than tying into the Help Viewer architecture.
OTOH, it also comes with MASSIVE printed documentation, so that kind of makes up for it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hierarchical menus in the Dock.
|
|
Mac Pro 2.66, 2GB RAM | 4 x 250 GB HD's | MOTO 424e/2408-II
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cupertino, CA USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by beez1717
all they have done is shove it under and caused people to ignore it.
I would like to see apple script finally have a useful GUI unlike that stupid automator which doesn't do any of the thins that most users would want to do!
What kind of things do most users want to do?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Cupertino, CA USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by beez1717
What apple is ignoring all together: Apple script! I would like to see them finally up support for this wonderful and useful feature of the mac.
AppleScript in Leopard is a major advance forward. Check out AppleScript: The Language of Automation for details and examples.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hong Kong
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's not often you get an Apple Product manager asking you what you want the product to do.
Might be a good idea to take advantage beez1717.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WI, United States
Status:
Offline
|
|
This isn't really an advanced feature, nor would including it really be that spectacular, but I just found out today that I can't drag an image from Safari in to the Dashboard Tile Game. I had to drag it to the desktop first. Seems like something I should be able to do.
|
|
Mac- iBook G4 12" / Tiger 10.4.11 / 1.2 GHz PowerPC G4 / 512 MB RAM / 30 GB HD / ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 32 MB RAM / ComboDrive
PC- Home Built 19" / XP Home Edition SP2 32-Bit / 3.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo/ 4 GB RAM / 320 GB HD / ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 1 GB RAM / DVD-RW
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
They changed that some time ago - when you drag an image out of Safari, it defaults to dragging the image LOCATION (url) rather than the image itself.
Try dragging the image to an e-mail: same thing.
Drives me friggin' up the wall.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: WI, United States
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
Try dragging the image to an e-mail: same thing.
Now that works for me. That's odd.
|
|
Mac- iBook G4 12" / Tiger 10.4.11 / 1.2 GHz PowerPC G4 / 512 MB RAM / 30 GB HD / ATI Mobility Radeon 9200 32 MB RAM / ComboDrive
PC- Home Built 19" / XP Home Edition SP2 32-Bit / 3.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo/ 4 GB RAM / 320 GB HD / ATI Radeon HD 3870 X2 1 GB RAM / DVD-RW
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
From Safari directly into an e-mail?
That pastes the link for me.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
When you drag something in Safari, Safari itself does not decide on a particular type of what you drag. It offers a multitude of flavours of the draged data. For an image that's a pict, a tiff, | | | |