 |
 |
Partitioning for intel from ppc
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have a MBPro on the way. I went out and got myself an external HD to back up my desktop (PPC G5) onto, in prep for transitioning. I am trying to partition into three pieces
1: 250 gb to be used as back up for new MBP
2: 40 gb to be used as back up old Pismo
3: 110 gb to be used as general dump drive for movies, photo backup, etc
I chose - MacOS extended, case sensitive, journaled for all three partitions, and chose tGUID as my partition scheme, so I can boot my MBP from the backup, if need be.
Trouble is, it seems to be stalling on the "creating partition map" step. How long should this take? Am I attempting a legitimate partitioning scheme?
-A
(Apologies if this is the wrong section of the forum - I can't quite decide where it belongs)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Moderator 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
You might try wiping/re-formatting the drive without attempting the partition. Once complete, retry the partitioning scheme.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Administrator 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: California
Status:
Online
|
|
On an external drive, you can use Apple Partition Map or GUID. The Intel Macs only insist on GUID partition maps on internal boot drives.
When I repartitioned an old HD for a Windows user, it did take a very long time to lay down a Master Boot Record partition map.
Any particular reason why you chose case-sensitive?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
On an external drive, you can use Apple Partition Map or GUID. The Intel Macs only insist on GUID partition maps on internal boot drives.
That's good news - I tried it with APM and it took about 45 seconds.
Originally Posted by reader50
Any particular reason why you chose case-sensitive?
No great reason - Just thought since Unix is case sensitive, and I use a fair amount of commandline stuff, I would be better off being case sensitive. Is there any drawback to being case-sensitive?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Arizona Wasteland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Juneappal
No great reason - Just thought since Unix is case sensitive, and I use a fair amount of commandline stuff, I would be better off being case sensitive. Is there any drawback to being case-sensitive?
Plenty. Some applications, include many from Adobe, expect '/path/to/folder' and 'path/To/folder' to be the same thing. Under a case sensitive system, they are not, and the Application won't run.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well that's a pain, isn't it. I suppose I better stick with Mac Conventions, then, but I don't like it.
Thanks for your help, by the way.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|