 |
 |
How of you really don't care what OS X looks like?
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just wondering how many of us here are not into obsessing over cosmetics?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
How of you no how to rite sentance?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Your certain this suitableness there does wake by interest, is which it to the grammar?
(note: that started out as "How many of you care about proper grammar?" before I babelfished it.  )
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
And of course, everyone cares what it looks like, don't even pretend you don't. You may not care about little things, like consistency between all the different styles (aqua, graphite, metallic, etc.) but leopard supposedly addresses this (haven't gotten it on my own computer yet). But don't pretend you'd be happy using a fisher-price looking OS like windows XP or something. Looks do count. You can always tell whether app designers followed Apple's guidelines, because some apps look "apple-like" and some well...don't. And that is a huge difference.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was expecting that I'd be able to edit my poll options after posting them, I usually write my posts and then proofread them after posting them... My mistake, I apologize for this!
(Last edited by besson3c; Oct 28, 2007 at 12:06 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Nodnarb 
And of course, everyone cares what it looks like, don't even pretend you don't. You may not care about little things, like consistency between all the different styles (aqua, graphite, metallic, etc.) but leopard supposedly addresses this (haven't gotten it on my own computer yet). But don't pretend you'd be happy using a fisher-price looking OS like windows XP or something. Looks do count. You can always tell whether app designers followed Apple's guidelines, because some apps look "apple-like" and some well...don't. And that is a huge difference.
I voted for the second option. I'm not expecting many votes for the first option.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm picky, but I usually trust Apple regarding what looks good. Granted, 10.X.0 versions usually have a number of unresolved issues, but in the end, I'm happy by 10.x.2 regarding all of the change.
There have been a number of changes that I've thought "ARE YOU SERIOUS" only to fall in love with them later. I've been on OS X since DP2 (if you can call that OS X).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
