 |
 |
Application Firewall
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I can't get my ipfw settings to stick between restarts.
|
|
The era of anthropomorphizing hardware is over.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
this sounds like it would make LittleSnitch redundant. Is that true? Does it give you the ability to block
-any network connection
-local network connection
-broadcast
-multicast
while also selecting a ports (or port range) and the protocols (UDP, TCP, any, etc.)
can someone clarify who has used the new feature of leopard and little snitch how they compare? thanks!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by wobbly
this sounds like it would make LittleSnitch redundant. Is that true? Does it give you the ability to block
-any network connection
-local network connection
-broadcast
-multicast
while also selecting a ports (or port range) and the protocols (UDP, TCP, any, etc.)
can someone clarify who has used the new feature of leopard and little snitch how they compare? thanks!
The Application Firewall in 10.5 is an either/or proposition. You either block all access to an application, or allow all.
|
|
The era of anthropomorphizing hardware is over.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
thanks! a bit dissapointing. From what i can see LIttle Snitch isn't available yet for Leopard only a beta version.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Little Snitch is for outgoing traffic. Leopard's Application Firewall is for incoming traffic. The two don't overlap at all.
Leopard's application firewall also gives you no control over port numbers, and according to recent reports, lets certain ports through even if you tell it to block all incoming connections. I wouldn't bother with it, and would put your Mac behind a router or other hardware firewall instead so that you know your ports are blocked.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
The problem with the Set access for specific services and applications setting is that the user has no idea what the DEFAULT BEHAVIOR is. Here's a simple scenario ....
I enable this setting in the firewall and add no applications to the list whatsoever. The million dollar question is are incoming connections blocked or not? If so, then that should be documented somewhere. And if not, then the protection is pretty weak since it doesn't exist until you happen to launch or manually configure various applications on your machine. And what happens if the incoming traffic isn't application specific?
Unfortunately, this linked document on the Apple Support site still doesn't address these fundamental issues.
OAW
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|