 |
 |
Address Book Server / CardDAV Solutions?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
What is out there right now for good server-based contact servers that integrate with Address Book, iPhones and iPads?
The most obvious solution is MobileMe. Besides that...
I know you can use Gmail's contact list with Macs, but it seems very buggy. You have to set it up as an exchange server on the iDevices. And on the Mac, it has it's own mysterious, custom google syncing. This hasn't worked very well.
You can also run an address book server (CardDAV) on OS X Server. Are there any other services that run CardDAV servers? It appears google doesn't offer this yet. I searched around and found nothing. What are people doing for server based contacts these days?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use MobileMe, but might switch to Lion (Server) when it comes out.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Lion server does look good, I've seen the seeds. But What about "cloud" based solutions?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
We're not looking for software, we're looking for a service.
And I had found that site already and saw this big blank page: CardDAV Service Providers
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, I suspect the problem with CardDAV is the same as CalDAV and various groupware products - nobody wants to compete with Exchange.
Let us know if you find anything!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by l008com
We're not looking for software, we're looking for a service.
Good; running your own Exchange is insane.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
We'd run a Mac server long before taking the crazy step of running an exchange server. Lion Server actually looks pretty solid too, much better than Snow Leopard. BUT, we're not interested in a server, we're interested in a service. Really google seems to be the only option, hopefully they implement CardDAV. Soon.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Although I don't think it's going to be my problem, this customer was apparently not happy with my inability to find a solution (as none exist) that they might be switching to someone else. Oh well.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think it's smart to not suggest any OS X Server stuff at this point, unless you plan to run their servers and make a profit off of them.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I absolutely wouldn't do it RIGHT now, I'd wait for 10.7. That said, they don't strike me as the kind of people that want to deal with typical server headaches. They want easy seamless. Right now, in my opinion, mobileme is as close as they can get.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by l008com
I absolutely wouldn't do it RIGHT now, I'd wait for 10.7. That said, they don't strike me as the kind of people that want to deal with typical server headaches. They want easy seamless. Right now, in my opinion, mobileme is as close as they can get.
I was thinking more along the lines of rackable hardware that can be hosted anywhere, which is lacking.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
I suspect, like the previous 3 releases, the enthusiasm for Lion server will fade once it hits the market and reality sinks in.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Not to sound intentionally snarky, but what reason is there for any enthusiasm?
It was bad enough that it was so hard to find a plethora of hosting providers offering XServes that will run OS X, and rightfully so, it makes zero sense to pay for dedicated hardware for a dedicated server when a Linux VPS can be had for $20/month. I suspect the core audience of XServe users were a small number that needed some Mac-only server product such as Final Cut Pro Server, Mac IT people that wanted to reduce their costs by consolidating their skill sets/supported platforms around OS X, or users not savvy enough to setup a Linux VPS. Within this group, they probably had to consist of users who were comfortable with running their own servers in-house (or were comfortable with whatever Mac hosts were in existence) and weren't tantalized by some cloud service as a replacement for this need. Moreover, these ongoing costs of running your own servers in your own machine room would need to be justified to warrant an upgrade rather than a migration to something else.
With the killing off of the XServe, this group not only has to justify running their own servers, but now they have to justify doing so on non-rackable hardware. I'm sure the Mac hosting providers have already gone to plan B with their business, and are bailing on Mac hosting (save the ones racking Minis, which is a niche sort of business model at best).
Lion Server can have all the pretty shininess to it in the world and be stable and bug free, but it makes no sense to run an important server outside a machine room, and therefore I don't see much to be excited about unless doing very small potato stuff is enough to warrant your excitement. Meh.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's great for home users that wanted some of the server features, w/o having to invest in an expensive OS.
-t
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
It's great for home users that wanted some of the server features, w/o having to invest in an expensive OS.
-t
True!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2011
Status:
Offline
|
|
You might find "Address Book Server" from www.addressbookserver.com useful as well. It is unfortunate that this product is often confused with Apple's own offerings. However this project dates back to the 10.4 days, long before Apple included their own offering by the same name with OSX server.
Since July 2011 it is available for free and supposed synchronising contact and calendar events.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Stoneham, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Since July 2011 eh? I see they have a long history of service
This topic is moot, I was the subcontractor for this job, and the end customer acted like everything was great, but then called the contractor and told them they didn't like me, something to the effect of I wasn't used to working in "high end" homes.
Because a few iPads and MacBooks function totally differently when they're in a large snobby house vs an apartment. :roll eyes: Oh well, you can't make everyone happy. They guy told me ahead of time, that this customer was very picky about the people they let in their home.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
MacBook 2.0GHz CD; MacBook Pro 15" 2.4GHz Late '08; PowerMac G4 MDD Dual 1GHz; 3x Xserve G4 1GHz; Mac Mini 2GHz; Big pile of broken and working bits;
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|