Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Tip: Lion and Time Machine (applies to non TM users as well)

Tip: Lion and Time Machine (applies to non TM users as well)
Thread Tools
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2011, 11:07 PM
 
I just discovered that for some reason even though I haven't used Time Machine for years Time Machine had enabled itself after upgrading to Lion, and was attempting local backups via its new MobileBackup scheme. Normally the MobileBackup stuff resides in its own partition, but I guess since this partition could not be found it instead was dumping crap into a hidden directory, /.MobileBackup.trash . When I discovered this this directory was over 4Gb in size.

I fixed this by disabling Time Machine via the System Preferences pane, running:

sudo tmutil disablelocal

and deleting that crazy large directory. Not only was this consuming disk space, but it was also causing performance problems, as would be expected.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 29, 2011, 07:03 AM
 
You went to the terminal when Time Machine has a big OFF-ON switch in System Preferences?

Good info: http://web.me.com/pondini/Time_Machine/30.html
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 29, 2011, 09:42 AM
 
I wanted to make sure that if it enabled itself again without my doing so that it wouldn't be doing local backups
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2011, 04:49 PM
 
Oh god, FOUR gigabytes? The horror.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2011, 07:25 PM
 
What's with the stupid attitude mduell?

The main problem/annoyance was the performance loss, but if I had let this go long enough the loss in disk space could have become a problem too as it grew in size.

Really nothing to get all confrontational about though, chill. If the tip is not relevant or
helpful to you, move on... No big deal.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2011, 07:43 PM
 
Thanks for the info.

-t
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 30, 2011, 08:59 PM
 
No prob
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 31, 2011, 02:38 AM
 
Time Machine is such a hard disk destroyer I don't use it anymore. Thanks for the info besson.


"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 31, 2011, 05:54 PM
 
I have a mid 2007 2.2 GB MacBook Pro. I drag backup any new stuff I do (mostly text) to an external HD. I plan to get another Mac after Lion shakes down. I was planning to get Airport Extreme and a separate HD to do backups on both my Macs using Time Machine. If Time Machine is not the way to go, Is there another program I could use?
Thanks in advance
     
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2011, 01:22 AM
 
I like SuperDuper, which costs 27.95 SuperDuper! or CarbonCopyCloner free Carbon Copy Cloner - Home Although some folks don't like this method, many do, and I have created daily backups successfully for years using SD. For me the advantage is that I always have a ready to go B/U startup disk.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2011, 01:40 AM
 
Another vote for SuperDuper!


"That plane's dustin' crops where there ain't no crops."
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2011, 04:09 PM
 
A clone is not a very good backup. There's a use for both, but a good backup is always a good idea.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2011, 04:36 PM
 
Just to be clear, I agree with mduell, but my post was not supposed to suggest that you should not use Time Machine. It was simply revealing a bug relating to the Snow Leopard to Lion upgrade. There are always bugs with upgrading an OS, that this had to do with Time Machine doesn't speak to Time Machine's weaknesses. Time Machine is fine (although it would be a lot better if OS X had a more modern filesystem)
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2011, 06:06 PM
 
Once you run the command to disable the local backups, Time Machine is just as good as any other backup system you'll find on HFS+.

Ticking sound coming from a .pkg package? Don't let the .bom go off! Inspect it first with Pacifist. Macworld - five mice!
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 1, 2011, 06:27 PM
 
I think that even if I were using Time Machine I'd still want to disable the local backup thing. It's okay to thrash another hard drive every hour, but I don't want it competing for I/O with stuff I'm doing on the local drive every hour.
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2