Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac OS X > Mavericks is free

Mavericks is free
Thread Tools
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Muncietucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 02:25 PM
 
Just announced at the Apple event... that the 10.9 Mavericks update is free.
     
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 02:31 PM
 
I feel like this demonstrates how much value they find in the computer line. That or there's some money making trick int here I don't know about.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 02:34 PM
 
or they really want people to update, so they can run some other new paid software?
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 02:37 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
I feel like this demonstrates how much value they find in the computer line. That or there's some money making trick int here I don't know about.
I can only guess that there's a google-like information gathering thingy in there somewhere that could make money.
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 02:47 PM
 
Don't mean to be an asshole [insert Louis CK bit here], but my threads get moved when there's a more appropriate forum and I have to suffer through 3 people seeing them a week. And there's already an existing and active thread on the Apple event. Just sayin.
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 02:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton View Post
Don't mean to be an asshole [insert Louis CK bit here], but my threads get moved when there's a more appropriate forum and I have to suffer through 3 people seeing them a week. And there's already an existing and active thread on the Apple event. Just sayin.
BUT MAVERICKS IS FREE!


"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 03:21 PM
 
Just downloaded Maverick. So snappy. Makes my 2009 Mac Pro hum.....
I eat turtle soup for breakfast
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Netherlands
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 03:27 PM
 
IOS7 is free too and it's terrible
{Animated sigs are not allowed.}
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 03:39 PM
 
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton View Post
Don't mean to be an asshole [insert Louis CK bit here], but my threads get moved when there's a more appropriate forum and I have to suffer through 3 people seeing them a week. And there's already an existing and active thread on the Apple event. Just sayin.
I have to agree this is about as "Mac OS" of a thread as you can get.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 04:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar View Post
I feel like this demonstrates how much value they find in the computer line. That or there's some money making trick int here I don't know about.
They probably just want to make fun of WIndows 8's adoption rate by getting every Mac from the last 5 years on Mavericks.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 04:58 PM
 
I wish Apple would make Snow Lep free. Now that's an OS.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 05:05 PM
 
I have install discs going back to Jaguar...do you actually need to install SL on something?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 05:29 PM
 
Originally Posted by PB2K View Post
IOS7 is free too and it's terrible
Hahaha.

Get over it.

(Or, more likely: just install it yourself and give it a week.)
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 05:41 PM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
Hahaha.

Get over it.

(Or, more likely: just install it yourself and give it a week.)
Does his thinking this way bother you?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 05:58 PM
 
Originally Posted by Laminar View Post
I have install discs going back to Jaguar...do you actually need to install SL on something?
No. Though thanks for the implied offer.

I just always thought Apple should stop charging for deprecated OSes.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 06:17 PM
 
They're just trolling Microsoft.

My sig is 1 pixel too big.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 06:23 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
I wish Apple would make Snow Lep free. Now that's an OS.
Snow Leopard is such a great system, very clean and fast. I'm leery of ML.
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
     
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 06:47 PM
 
I must say, I'm impressed. Safari is noticeably improved. Everything feels much, much zippier. Also the fact that hiding Safari pretty much pushes its appetite for CPU cycles to zero. I'll take it for a more detailed spin later, but so far, I'm a happy camper!
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 06:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton View Post
Don't mean to be an asshole [insert Louis CK bit here], but my threads get moved when there's a more appropriate forum and I have to suffer through 3 people seeing them a week. And there's already an existing and active thread on the Apple event. Just sayin.
Nice job breaking it, hero.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 06:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by besson3c View Post
Does his thinking this way bother you?
No, his complaining about it does, though.

This is the Mavericks-costs-zero-dollars-to-upgrade-to circlejerk.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 07:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
No, his complaining about it does, though.

This is the Mavericks-costs-zero-dollars-to-upgrade-to circlejerk.

Why does it have to be a circlejerk?

You really come across as ideologically invested in all things Mac. If that's your thing, just as I've had to deal with people calling me a Linux fanboy (and making arguments against Desktop Linux which I've barely ever touched), you might get that Mac fanboy branding.

More than anything though, the whole ideological thing fascinates me, I'd like to better understand it. I used to be that way too, so I'm not trying to sound elitist or enlightened. In fact, I'm not exactly sure why or when I changed, but at this point I just don't get the ideological thing, particularly since more and more the OS is becoming an increasingly irrelevant part of a computing experience when compared to the richness of the apps we use.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 07:49 PM
 
You didn't get the self-deprecating aspect of calling this a circle-jerk at all, did you?

Why are you hell-bent on painting me as a fanboy just because I'm annoyed at people whining at how iOS 7 hurts their sensibilities?

There are about three things that are worse in iOS 7 than in iOS 6, and hundreds that are better. Nearly everything the people whine about who haven't even installed iOS 7 yet are things that are just different, not worse.

If you have legit complaints: great. There's a forum for that.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 08:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
You didn't get the self-deprecating aspect of calling this a circle-jerk at all, did you?
No, sorry.

Why are you hell-bent on painting me as a fanboy just because I'm annoyed at people whining at how iOS 7 hurts their sensibilities?

There are about three things that are worse in iOS 7 than in iOS 6, and hundreds that are better. Nearly everything the people whine about who haven't even installed iOS 7 yet are things that are just different, not worse.
You just answered your own question.

To those that prefer iOS 6, this is their preference, and it doesn't need to be challenged unless they make a specific point that is simply false.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 08:22 PM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
You didn't get the self-deprecating aspect of calling this a circle-jerk at all, did you?

Why are you hell-bent on painting me as a fanboy just because I'm annoyed at people whining at how iOS 7 hurts their sensibilities?

There are about three things that are worse in iOS 7 than in iOS 6, and hundreds that are better. Nearly everything the people whine about who haven't even installed iOS 7 yet are things that are just different, not worse.

If you have legit complaints: great. There's a forum for that.
I installed iOS 7 on my iPad 2.

I hate it, so I didn't install it on my iPhone.

How much of a bad person does that make me?

Home - Twitter - Sig Wall-Retired - Flickr
     
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 22, 2013, 11:49 PM
 
Worst part of iOS7 is the calendar. There is no way to view the entire month and the events of a specific day at the same time. man, i miss that calendar.
I eat turtle soup for breakfast
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2013, 01:51 AM
 
Installed Mavericks and the other updates, except iMovie. It says my iMac's ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro 256 MB does not meet the system requirements.

iMovie for Mac requires OS X Mavericks, 2GB of RAM (4GB recommended), an OpenCL-capable graphics card, and a display with 1280-by-800 resolution or higher
it looks like the HD2600 is not open CL capable. It does 1680x1050
"The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church" Saint Tertullian, 197 AD
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2013, 09:05 AM
 
Originally Posted by starman View Post
I installed iOS 7 on my iPad 2.

I hate it, so I didn't install it on my iPhone.

How much of a bad person does that make me?
None at all, primarily since you don't take every opportunity, whether relevant or not, to pipe up about how terrible it is.
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2013, 09:34 AM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
No. Though thanks for the implied offer.

I just always thought Apple should stop charging for deprecated OSes.
You can get SL for free, though: If you have Leopard and want to use iCloud, you can contact iCloud support and they will hook you up with a copy of SL for free so you can upgrade to Lion using the App Store.

I agree that SL and Tiger PPC would be good versions to put on a server somewhere to let people download to their heart's content, much like 7.5.3 was eventually made free.
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2013, 10:59 AM
 
Installed yesterday. So far, Spotlight hasn't indexed anything and I never realized how much I use it to quick-launch everything. Also, Preview.app hangs whenever I try and open a photo, but it's impossible to search for "Mavericks Preview" and get any results I want.

Activity Monitor is totally revamped.
     
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Muncietucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2013, 11:02 AM
 
Just heard on another forum that 10.9 deletes any previous Java installs. They discovered this when, after they installed 10.9, they tried to launch one of their Adobe CS5 apps and got a prompt to install Java 6, which CS5 requires.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 23, 2013, 11:58 AM
 
Originally Posted by Chongo View Post
Installed Mavericks and the other updates, except iMovie. It says my iMac's ATI Radeon HD 2600 Pro 256 MB does not meet the system requirements.
iMovie for Mac requires OS X Mavericks, 2GB of RAM (4GB recommended), an OpenCL-capable graphics card, and a display with 1280-by-800 resolution or higher
it looks like the HD2600 is not open CL capable. It does 1680x1050
Update: iMovie rev 10.0 installed this morning. 9.0.9 is in folder as is iMove HD
"The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the church" Saint Tertullian, 197 AD
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2013, 01:30 PM
 
Opinions from the gurus about whether I should update to Mavericks on a Feb 2007 20" iMac?

2.16GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
Got 4GB RAM but it only sees 3.
256MB VRAM
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2013, 02:30 PM
 
runs fine on my 2.16 GHz 24" machine.
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2013, 02:36 PM
 
I'm waiting to hear before putting it on my MBA - 2.0 C2D and locked in at 2GB of RAM. The SSD makes everything snappy enough but I'll hold off upgrading until I'm sure it's a good idea.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Pittsburgh
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 24, 2013, 03:56 PM
 
I did a fresh install on a 2007 20" iMac with SSD and 6GB RAM. I have not yet noticed a vast difference in performance from 10.8, but my time working on it has been cut back the past couple days. It certainly did not seem slower.
     
The Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Well the sports issue was within arm's reach but they closed up shop and kicked me out. And I'm out of toilet paper.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 09:41 AM
 
Battery life went down by about 10%-20% on my Macbook Air since upgrading to 10.9

(edit: this may have just been a mis-calculation of battery life since Spotlight had been doing a lot of indexing prior)
( Last edited by And.reg; Nov 3, 2013 at 04:52 PM. )
This one time, at Boot Camp, I stuck a flute up my PC.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 10:15 AM
 
I installed Mavericks on my old Mid 2007 iMac, not expecting much. Complete fresh install.

To my surprise, my iMac is running much better and is more responsive.
VIrtual Memory handling specifically is much improved.

As a matter of fact, I was ready to buy a new iMac because the old one was too slow. Now with Mavericks, I might wait another year.

-t
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 03:39 PM
 
The update is night and day on my production machine (early 2011 13" i7 MacBook Pro) . Logic X runs so much more smoothly that it isn't funny. It also uses FAR less RAM.

The last project I'd completed was a 150-minute live mix that would page out to disk like crazy even after upgrading the machine to 16 GB.
In Mavericks, it uses 7GB of RAM, and page-outs are a whopping 86 MEGAbytes.

At some point, a big SSD, and this machine looks like it might last me a year or two longer than I'd expected it to even two weeks ago.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 04:00 PM
 
The machine uses far less RAM or Logic X uses less RAM? If the later, I really don't understand how an OS update would make software on that OS use less RAM.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 04:07 PM
 
One primary job of an OS is memory management, to include allocation, bookkeeping (who has what at any given time), and deallocation. If the OS manages the bookkeeping better, it can allocate and deallocate more quickly and more efficiently, so memory requests don't stack up and have an application "using" a lot more RAM addresses than it actually uses.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
The Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Well the sports issue was within arm's reach but they closed up shop and kicked me out. And I'm out of toilet paper.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 04:11 PM
 
A couple of reboots later and Mavericks seems snappier (and same battery life as with 10.8.5-ish)...Maybe it was just Spotlight running in the background causing slowness though I didn't see it indexing
This one time, at Boot Camp, I stuck a flute up my PC.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 04:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by mattyb View Post
The machine uses far less RAM or Logic X uses less RAM? If the later, I really don't understand how an OS update would make software on that OS use less RAM.
Logic uses a fraction of what it did.

Activity Viewer also shows some 8 GB of "compressed" memory.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 04:18 PM
 
Originally Posted by ghporter View Post
One primary job of an OS is memory management, to include allocation, bookkeeping (who has what at any given time), and deallocation. If the OS manages the bookkeeping better, it can allocate and deallocate more quickly and more efficiently, so memory requests don't stack up and have an application "using" a lot more RAM addresses than it actually uses.
This is true, up to a point. If we're talking UNIX type OSes : start up (for example) Oracle and a certain amount of memory is allocated. Oracle manages this memory. It decides what is put into it, to change the sizes of different pools etc. But Oracle will also tell the OS not to swap out some stuff, so it controls some things that it wants kept in 'real' memory as opposed to virtual memory. If the OS was updated, but not the software (Logic X) then is the OS saying 'I know better, I'm going to swap out more stuff belonging to Logic X'?
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 04:48 PM
 
To be fair, I suspect that this may be a Logic issue, as well.
     
The Mighty
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Well the sports issue was within arm's reach but they closed up shop and kicked me out. And I'm out of toilet paper.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 04:51 PM
 
Calendars is much snappier, new events are easier to make, and instantly updates my iPod correctly (no re-load waits)
This one time, at Boot Camp, I stuck a flute up my PC.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 05:52 PM
 
mattyb: I don't understand how it works in intimate detail, but Mavericks features memory compression. I don't know if this is anything like file compression that operates largely based on white space, but...
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 06:21 PM
 
I just checked and I'm still (apparently) having a problem with Calendar. I decided to put my calendars in iCloud so I wouldn't have to worry about updating my computer after I've made an entry on my phone, etc., but when I changed the setting for iCloud in Settings then started Calendar, it started "Moving calendars to server account"...and it hasn't finished. I de-selected iCloud calendars and killed Calendar - several times - and it's still trying. I'm going to reboot later and see if that fixes/undoes/changes it.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 06:33 PM
 
Originally Posted by mattyb View Post
The machine uses far less RAM or Logic X uses less RAM? If the later, I really don't understand how an OS update would make software on that OS use less RAM.
Mavericks uses memory compression. It is FAR advanced in general memory handling and management.

http://www.apple.com/osx/advanced-technologies/

Rats, Besson beat me to it.

-t
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 06:37 PM
 
My Calendar issue seems to be resolved. After a restart I started Calendar and it still came up with the "Moving to server account" message, but then it (finally, I guess) asked me for my iCloud password. After I entered that, it finished "moving" in less than a minute. I'm a much happier camper.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 3, 2013, 08:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by turtle777 View Post
Rats, Besson beat me to it.

-t

That's because I am better than you.

-b
     
 
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:38 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2015 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2