Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Networking > New 24" 3.06 GHZ iMac Wireless N Problems...

New 24" 3.06 GHZ iMac Wireless N Problems...
Thread Tools
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2008, 03:11 PM
 
Just got my replacement for my first 24" 3.06 GHz iMac, and again the airport does not work properly. I have isolated the problem. It appears that the new 24" iMac does not like wireless N or mixed wireless n/g networks. I have tested this extensively. It works fine when connected to the internet through airport express, fine when connected through my neighbors linksys router (both wireless g networks), but will not connect properly to either my time capsule, or the airport extreme that the time capsule is replacing, both n or mixed n networks. Over N the iMac struggles to connect, and when it does connect, it works extremely slowly and unreliably. WTF? Is anybody else having these issues with a new 24" over wireless N? I really don't want to send yet another computer back to Apple.
Ad Hominem attacks are for losers...
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2008, 05:54 PM
 
My guess would be a disconnected or improperly connected antenna. Call AppleCare or take it to an Apple Store.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2008, 06:00 PM
 
This is the second one. I have already exchanged it once, and the replacement has the same problem. Wireless G should not work flawlessly if the antenna is loose, and it seems unlikely that this would happen twice in a row.
Ad Hominem attacks are for losers...
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 19, 2008, 08:56 PM
 
G is 2.4Ghz and only requires one antenna, N wants three.
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2008, 01:50 AM
 
I've found a workaround for this problem. After trying everything else, I figured I'd try using a fixed channel rather than automatic channel selection. I went into Airport Utility and arbitrarily selected channel 4, and everything is stable now, and my internet speeds have quadrupled. Slingplayer now streams at a steady 3MBPS over the local network, as opposed to the previously dismal 350 KBPS. Not a fix, but it does the trick, and hopefully a firmware/software update will take care of the rest in time...A
Ad Hominem attacks are for losers...
     
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2008, 02:06 AM
 
Originally Posted by popstand View Post
I've found a workaround for this problem. After trying everything else, I figured I'd try using a fixed channel rather than automatic channel selection. I went into Airport Utility and arbitrarily selected channel 4, and everything is stable now, and my internet speeds have quadrupled.
Sounds familiar. In theory automatic channel selection should find the channel with the best SNR and give you the best performance. In my experience it often doesn't. I have resorted to using tools like iStumbler or AirMoose to check out what channels are being used by people in the vicinity and then going for a free one. If possible it's even better to have an extra free "padding" channel between yours and the others. The only problem with those tools is that they won't see networks with hidden SSIDs.
     
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2008, 06:46 AM
 
I agree with Simon on this. I don't think Automatic Channel is intelligent enough to do its thing properly, especially if there are other channels in use around you. And being reactive rather than proactive, using automatic selection keeps YOUR network bouncing around while people around you just (typically) leave their channels set to the factory default (almost always 6 or 7) and don't even think about it. I prefer to "stake a claim" to a particular set of frequencies and make other people who show up later adapt to me. And I've never had an interference issue because of other networks in the area.

(I'm moving this to the Networking forum where it now obviously belongs.)
Glenn -----
OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denver, CO
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 20, 2008, 11:14 AM
 
Thanks for the feedback guys. I did take a look at the area with Airmoose, and indeed there were two different networks using channel 11 (the channel automatic selection had chosen). It still doesn't explain why the Mac Pro was having no difficulties, but either way at least it's a usable workaround.
Ad Hominem attacks are for losers...
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:40 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2