Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

version · Nov 21, 2003, 10:42 AM

Nice to hear that Mossad is known to be in Iraq, and that the Iraqis are targeting them too, hope they get the bastards.

http://www.mpacuk.org/mpac/data/d7fb9cc7/d7fb9cc7.jsp

BoomStick · Nov 21, 2003, 01:06 PM

Yes, I hope the mossad get those Iraqi bastards too!

petehammer · Nov 21, 2003, 01:10 PM

Originally posted by BoomStick:
Yes, I hope the mossad get those Iraqi bastards too!

So clever. Based on your other posts, congrats on being one of the most-inflammatory posters around here in a while. Here's a cookie.

BoomStick · 01:30 PM

Like his wasn't inflamitory.

Shove that cookie up your a$$.

Lookit here:

Originally posted by version:

So while we're at it, I want Al-Qaeeda to re-write their rules, killing of civilians on the mainland of the US is excusable if it meets their objectives.

Come back and talk to me when your country is nothing but a bombed out backwater, in which the rest of the world grew sick of hearing from; then spout this sh!t.

You didn't jump all over that one.

I guess you sympathize with this?

version · Nov 21, 2003, 01:38 PM

Originally posted by BoomStick:
Like his wasn't inflamitory.

Shove that cookie up your a$$.

Lookit here:

You didn't jump all over that one.

I guess you sympathize with this?

Nicely taken out of context there. If you read what I replied to, you'd see why I said that.
Basically, the US can't start weeping about moral values, human rights, and so on, when it seems to able to break them at will; so it should be for any other group in the world. Fair's fair dude.

einmakom · Nov 21, 2003, 02:24 PM

Quoting the Muslim Public Affairs Council of the UK is fine and well, but it is not a source to be taken seriously.

First of all, it is a Public Affairs group, not a news organization. The difference is huge between those two types of organizations. If you want to quote news to us, use a news source; even if it's a disreputable one like the Guardian, it's better than nought at all.

Second of all, it's an affairs coucil in and for the UK, not an operation with a representative actually located in Iraq. How good can the reporting be?

Thirdly, you show your true colors, by cheering at death. You chide another user for this, but do the same yourself.

eklipse · Nov 21, 2003, 02:32 PM

Why would the Mossad even be in Iraq to start with?

petehammer · Nov 21, 2003, 02:35 PM

Originally posted by einmakom:
If you want to quote news to us, use a news source; even if it's a disreputable one like the Guardian, it's better than nought at all.

This from a guy who quotes newsmax...

Why were they in Iraq? I can see the U.S. getting VERY upset over this as they have asked Israel to stay out of the situation.

Curious...

nas t. ho · Nov 21, 2003, 02:35 PM

Originally posted by eklipse:
Why would the Mossad even be in Iraq to start with?

that's a rhetorical question, isn't it?

einmakom · Nov 21, 2003, 02:35 PM

Originally posted by eklipse:
Why would the Mossad even be in Iraq to start with?

Excellent question.

With only one questionable source cited above, I doubt that they are- but that's version's new complaint. He also believes they are operating in Turkey and caused the bombings there, despite the declarations by sheiks and the Turkey foreign minister to the contrary.

nas t. ho · Nov 21, 2003, 02:37 PM

Originally posted by einmakom:
I doubt that they are..

LOL. you can't be serious?!

eklipse · Nov 21, 2003, 02:44 PM

Originally posted by nas t. ho:
that's a rhetorical question, isn't it?

No, seriously. Why would they need to be there?

version · Nov 21, 2003, 02:44 PM

Originally posted by einmakom:
Quoting the Muslim Public Affairs Council of the UK is fine and well, but it is not a source to be taken seriously.

First of all, it is a Public Affairs group, not a news organization. The difference is huge between those two types of organizations. If you want to quote news to us, use a news source; even if it's a disreputable one like the Guardian, it's better than nought at all.

Second of all, it's an affairs coucil in and for the UK, not an operation with a representative actually located in Iraq. How good can the reporting be?

Thirdly, you show your true colors, by cheering at death. You chide another user for this, but do the same yourself.

Here we go, a source that you don't agree with. Ha-Aretz still keepign you up nights?

My true colours? A death is always sad, but when it comes to someone who is deserving of it, then I say so what. Wonder what you'd say if Arafat was killed, or Saddam, or Osama.

version · Nov 21, 2003, 02:46 PM

Originally posted by eklipse:
Why would the Mossad even be in Iraq to start with?

I wonder too, must be to ensure that the Israeli constractors that the US admin. appointed to oversee various business interests is kept safe; or maybe to just help along to find those WMD.

Lerkfish · Nov 21, 2003, 03:20 PM

Originally posted by eklipse:
No, seriously. Why would they need to be there?

excellent question.
I dunno....could be they're very concerned about the oil pipeline through Syria to Israel?

Echelon · Nov 21, 2003, 06:26 PM

Originally posted by BoomStick:
Like his wasn't inflamitory.

Shove that cookie up your a$$.

Lookit here:

You didn't jump all over that one.

I guess you sympathize with this?

Damn straight. The leftist lackies are happy to exemplify hypocrisy.

Echelon · Nov 21, 2003, 06:28 PM

Originally posted by version:
A death is always sad, but when it comes to someone who is deserving of it, then I say so what. Wonder what you'd say if Arafat was killed, or Saddam, or Osama.

not all deaths are sad. If Saddam's head was diplayed publicly on a post, I'd be happy. The same for Usama. If those guys got whacked, they deserve it.

Justice done. May Allah have no mercy on your damned soul.

nas t. ho · Nov 22, 2003, 02:28 AM

Originally posted by eklipse:
No, seriously. Why would they need to be there?

hmmm...maybe because every diehard fundamentalist muslim and their mom is (going to be) in iraq. it's their chance of a lifetime to take a stab at the us, to stir up shyt and to die for allah.

could also be that some of these folks are going to sit at various dinner tables conjuring up plans for terrorist attacks in israel. i'm sure the mossat doesn't want to miss out on any of those parties...

theolein · Nov 22, 2003, 09:24 AM

Originally posted by version:
Here we go, a source that you don't agree with. Ha-Aretz still keepign you up nights?

My true colours? A death is always sad, but when it comes to someone who is deserving of it, then I say so what. Wonder what you'd say if Arafat was killed, or Saddam, or Osama.

What a nice person you are! Who is to say who deserves death or not? You? Are you suddenly the judge of humanity? What would you say if you lost a family member in a bombing near your home? Would you switch colours and cry out against the bombers or would you say they deserved to die?

You sound like you give more credence to some Islamic council in the UK than you would to an Israeli newspaper. Has the word "objectivity" ever entered your vocabulary?

Violence usually begets violence, be it from the barrel of a US-Soldier's M-16 or the car bomb of an Al Qaida suicide bomber.

I disagree with the US policy in post war Iraq, and think that has left a lot of things too late (Iraqi elected government should perhaps have been done much earlier, policing should have been given a much higher priority earlier), and I find Al Qaida and it's idea of bombing the world back into the 7th century no matter how many people die, disgusting.

I don't want to live in a world where I have to fear for my life because I don't agree with someone's idea of the one true religion (Al Qaida) and I don't want a world which is dominated by a post-fascist security apparatus (Patriot Act like laws in Western countries), and those two are begetting one another like Yin and yang, to the detriment of everyone else.