 |
 |
US National Debt
|
 |
|
 |
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Debt currently stands at around $6.93 trillion.
What happens if the US hit the National Debt ceiling, which currently stands at $7.384 trillion?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Can you go broke in a casino you own? 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by jbartone:
Debt currently stands at around $6.93 trillion.
What happens if the US hit the National Debt ceiling, which currently stands at $7.384 trillion?
Congress will raise the debt ceiling. Used to happen all the time before surpluses came along.
|
|
Power Macintosh Dual G4
SGI Indigo2 6.5.21f
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Chronic deficits are the real problem, and, with the recent spate of tax cuts, have probably become structural in nature.
The U.S. budget deficit hit a record $374.2 billion US in fiscal 2003, more than double the $157.8 billion US deficit the country recorded in fiscal 2002. The Office of Management and Budget estimates that the 2004 budget deficit will be even higher, topping out at $500 billion US.
This page provides a breakdown of the US federal debt, more than one-fifth of which is held overseas.
I thought conservatives were supposed to be the prudent fiscal managers?  Canada's ruling Liberals have presided over 9 years of balanced (or surplus) budgets and a shrinking national debt.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm surprised that Canada has had 9 years of surpluses. The US will never have consistent surpluses. No matter how much the government takes from the citizens, the politicians will always spend more. It's their nature.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NJ, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Deficits are not necessarily a bad thing. Besides, we have seen in the past (during Clinton's tenure) that a massive deficit can turn into a massive surplus within a 6-month period. All it takes is some sustained economic growth to turbocharge incoming tax receipts.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dis
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by spacefreak:
Deficits are not necessarily a bad thing. Besides, we have seen in the past (during Clinton's tenure) that a massive deficit can turn into a massive surplus within a 6-month period. All it takes is some sustained economic growth to turbocharge incoming tax receipts.
Didn't the CBO project that even with rosy economic growth figures, we'd still be spending in a deficit?
In theory, you can outgrow any spending deficit, but realistically, you can only grow so much...
BlackGriffen
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ottawa, ON
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by chabig:
I'm surprised that Canada has had 9 years of surpluses. The US will never have consistent surpluses. No matter how much the government takes from the citizens, the politicians will always spend more. It's their nature.
Out of curiosity, what do you find surprising?
Now if only Ontario wasn't in a 5 billion dollar debt, it would be all good.
Damned tories.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dis
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Aiglos:
Out of curiosity, what do you find surprising?
Now if only Ontario wasn't in a 5 billion dollar debt, it would be all good.
Damned tories.
We'll trade ya! It's only a little more than three orders of magnitude difference.
BlackGriffen
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Collie-fornya
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does anyone have the figures at their disposal? About 1 trillion when Reagan took office. Reagan-Bush 41 upped debt about 4 trillion dollars over 12 years. Clinton ?? Bush 43??
|
|
Suicide Bombers: That never-say-die spirit. No, that's not right.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here's a good source of historical debt/deficit numbers.
National Debt:
1980: 712 billion
1989: 2.2 trillion (Debt tripled under Reagan)
1993: 3.2 trillion
2000: 3.4 trillion (Debt grew by 6% under Clinton)
The better numbers are the debt as % of GDP.
1980: 26%
1989: 41%
1993: 50%
2000: 35%
[edit: these numbers refer to debt held by the public, which, I think, is a more accurate reflection of the real debt than the total debt, which includes intra-governmental debt.)
(Last edited by BRussell; Nov 29, 2003 at 07:57 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Collie-fornya
Status:
Offline
|
|
I looked up the Treasury numbers at:
US Treasury Link
and they are pretty close. These numbers are from US budgets according to the site:
2003 (Estimate)
$5,946,792 million
2002 (Estimate)
$5,854,990 million
2001 (Estimate)
$5,768,957 million
2000 (Estimate)
$5,686,338 million
1999
$5,606,087 million
1998
$5,478,711 million
1997
$5,369,694 million
1996
$5,181,921 million
1995
$4,921,005 million
1994
$4,643,691 million
1993
$4,351,403 million
1992
$4,002,123 million
1991
$3,598,485 million
1990
$3,206,564 million
1989
$2,868,039 million
1988
$2,601,307 million
1987
$2,346,125 million
1986
$2,120,629 million
1985
$1,817,521 million
1984
$1,564,657 million
1983
$1,371,710 million
1982
$1,137,345 million
1981
$ 994,845 million
1980
$ 909,050 million
|
|
Suicide Bombers: That never-say-die spirit. No, that's not right.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Collie-fornya
Status:
Offline
|
|
And more numbers from the Treasury at:
Historical Debt Link
Date
Amount
09/30/2000
$5,674,178,209,886.86
09/30/1999
5,656,270,901,615.43
09/30/1998
5,526,193,008,897.62
09/30/1997
5,413,146,011,397.34
09/30/1996
5,224,810,939,135.73
09/29/1995
4,973,982,900,709.39
09/30/1994
4,692,749,910,013.32
09/30/1993
4,411,488,883,139.38
09/30/1992
4,064,620,655,521.66
09/30/1991
3,665,303,351,697.03
09/28/1990
3,233,313,451,777.25
09/29/1989
2,857,430,960,187.32
09/30/1988
2,602,337,712,041.16
09/30/1987
2,350,276,890,953.00
09/30/1986
2,125,302,616,658.42
12/31/1985
1,945,941,616,459.88
12/31/1984
1,662,966,000,000.00
12/31/1983
1,410,702,000,000.00
12/31/1982
1,197,073,000,000.00
12/31/1981
1,028,729,000,000.00
12/31/1980
930,210,000,000.00
Somehwere there has to be apples and oranges in this.
|
|
Suicide Bombers: That never-say-die spirit. No, that's not right.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dis
Status:
Offline
|
|
Somebody, somewhere was enrolled in Bush's "fuzzy math" class because none of the three posted debt numbers are the same.
Hopefully this is just a result of measuring the debt at slightly different times...
BG
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
All Bushy has to do is print more money like he did with the tax cut and pay off the debt with it. This would be like sneeking a huge tax hike behind your back that would cause inflation to rise. The plus is there's no real technical tax bs behind it, its just doing an instant rebalance of the cash flow. Of course you don't want to do it too fast or the economy will crash, as your money will be worth much less.
|
|
"Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master." -George Washington
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Inside Maya and Lightwave, please help!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Who gives a sh1t about the National Debt. The worlds governmental system will collapse or we will simply blow ourselves up before ANYTHING is ever done to fix that problem. The bigger issue is I can't call the settings on my harddrive master and slave anymore. F*ck you LA!
|
|
All I want for Christmas is a Swedish and/or an Aussie girl in my lap, a Guinness in my hand and a big smile on my face.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|