NYT has the story (uname=macnn pass=macnn).
While it certainly doesn't prove that no connection exists, not surprising since proving such would be impossible, it certainly seems to undermine the case that a connection existed. Put in other words, it reduces the probability that anyone will be able to make a substantive connection.
Salon speculates that the CIA has it in for Bush (what with blaming the CIA for the "16 words" and outing a CIA operative), and that it is the source of the leak. If that's true, they could start leaking like a sieve in the runup to the election, especially if there's something embarrassing to leak.
BlackGriffen