Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > HR 2844 - proposed amendment to the Constitution -- Continuity of Representation

HR 2844 - proposed amendment to the Constitution -- Continuity of Representation
Thread Tools
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 10, 2004, 06:36 PM
 
http://www.thelibertycommittee.org/hr2844.htm


This alert was in response to the "Continuity of Government" (COG) report made public on June 4,
2003. The report calls for a constitutional amendment that would allow for the appointment of
members of the U.S. House of Representatives under vaguely defined circumstances.
During the
June 4th press conference, COG touted their proposed constitutional amendment and predicted
there would be no opposition to it. In addition, they predicted Congress would pass their proposed
amendment and be ratified by the states within 14 to 18 months. Their predictions were wrong, as
is their proposed constitutional amendment.

On July 23, 2003, The Liberty Committee presented opposition at a briefing for congressional
staff members. Congressmen Ron Paul (R-Texas) and Vic Snyder (D-Arkansas) spoke
persuasively against the COG proposal, as did Charles E. Rice, professor emeritus of Notre Dame Law School.

On July 24, 2003, Representatives Sensenbrenner, Dreier, Miller, Cole, Chabot, and Paul
introduced the Continuity in Representation Act of 2003 (H.R. 2844) as the alternative to the
COG proposal. H.R. 2844 is the practical and proper solution because it requires states to
promptly hold special elections of U.S. House members; not special appointments.

On January 21, 2004, the House Judiciary Committee passed H.R. 2844. The U.S. House will
likely vote on the legislation by February 20, 2004.
If this post is in the Lounge forum, it is likely to be my own opinion, and not representative of the position of MacNN.com.

     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2