Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

ghost_flash · Mar 30, 2004, 01:43 PM

Clinton Administration:
62 percent said no?

Poll on CNN.
It was either 62 or 67%, the screen flashed too quickly, go figure.

Rice: Public Perception

Favorable of Rice: 50%
Unfavorable: 25%
Unsure: 25%

I will make a prediction that the numbers for Rice will increase after she testifies.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 04:07 PM

Originally posted by ghost_flash:
Clinton Administration:
62 percent said no?

Poll on CNN.
It was either 62 or 67%, the screen flashed too quickly, go figure.

Rice: Public Perception

Favorable of Rice: 50%
Unfavorable: 25%
Unsure: 25%

I will make a prediction that the numbers for Rice will increase after she testifies.

Heh.

She's such a bad liar, she'll just contradict herself while under oath.
Then come the perjury charges. But, no problem. That's what pardons are for.

Although I doubt her numbers will be that high afterwards.

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 04:16 PM

zachs already calling what Rice is going to say a lie, but defends Clark when he is dishonest and is caught.

You aren't gaining much credibility here zach.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 04:18 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
zachs already calling what Rice is going to say a lie, but defends Clark when he is dishonest and is caught.

You aren't gaining much credibility here zach.

Do I need to post the lies she's already told...again? Do I?

Hell, if she's doing it now, why worry about doing it under oath? After all, she's got Bush to pardon her.

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 04:19 PM

Originally posted by zachs:
Do I need to post the lies she's already told...again? Do I?

Hell, if she's doing it now, why worry about doing it under oath? After all, she's got Bush to pardon her.

Heh that was Clinton that handed out the pardons. Not Bush.

Again, she hasn't taken the stand and you are already saying she will lie.

BTW that site you gave as subjective.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 04:26 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
Heh that was Clinton that handed out the pardons. Not Bush.

Again, she hasn't taken the stand and you are already saying she will lie.

BTW that site you gave as subjective.

Clinton's pardons were no worse than Bush I's.

As for Condo-lie-zza, she hasn't told the truth in the past, so why start now. But maybe she'll surprise us.

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 04:49 PM

I wish you was as critical with Kerry and Clark.

But you aren't.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 04:57 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
I wish you was as critical with Kerry and Clark.

But you aren't.

I could say the same about you with Bush and Condi.

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 05:01 PM

Originally posted by zachs:
I could say the same about you with Bush and Condi.

You could, but I haven't said either way. I said I was going to wait and see.

See, I am playing it smart.

voodoo · Mar 30, 2004, 05:02 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
See, I am playing it smart.

OK, why the change in tactic?

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 05:03 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
You could, but I haven't said either way. I said I was going to wait and see.

See, I am playing it smart.

That's why I said I could say it.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 05:03 PM

Originally posted by voodoo:
OK, why the change in tactic?

LOL.

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 05:04 PM

Originally posted by zachs:
That's why I said I could say it.

LOL! So I take it you WONT be saying it,

What a horrible backpeddle.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 05:16 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
LOL! So I take it you WONT be saying it,

What a horrible backpeddle.

Are you gonna acknowledge that Bush and Condi Rice have lied?

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 05:18 PM

Originally posted by zachs:
Are you gonna acknowledge that Bush and Condi Rice have lied?

Oh, I am SURE they have lied.

There is no doubt in my mind that they have lied.

Everyone has lied.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 05:28 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
Oh, I am SURE they have lied.

There is no doubt in my mind that they have lied.

Everyone has lied.

So, if they support Bush, it's OK, "everyone lies"?
If they're Democrats (or voted Democratic), it's an outrage?

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 05:29 PM

Originally posted by zachs:
So, if they support Bush, it's OK, "everyone lies"?
If they're Democrats (or voted Democratic), it's an outrage?

No, no one said that. Not even close.

Go spin somewhere else.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 05:33 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
No, no one said that. Not even close.

Go spin somewhere else.

I didn't know we were playing Spin The Post.

Read what I wrote again. Did I say anyone said that?
I asked a question.

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 05:38 PM

Originally posted by zachs:
I didn't know we were playing Spin The Post.

Read what I wrote again. Did I say anyone said that?
I asked a question.

So if NO ONE said that? WHY did you ask it?
Did you just pull it out of your butt?

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 05:46 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
So if NO ONE said that? WHY did you ask it?
Did you just pull it out of your butt?

The fact that you DIDN'T say it one way or the other is exactly why I asked. I wanted a clarification.

I'll ask again. Is a Bush supporter's lying OK, because "everyone lies", but a Democrat's lying not...it's outrageous?

Zimphire · Mar 30, 2004, 06:00 PM

Originally posted by zachs:
The fact that you DIDN'T say it one way or the other is exactly why I asked. I wanted a clarification.

So if you don't say something either way, do I just assume the worst?

I'll ask again. Is a Bush supporter's lying OK, because "everyone lies", but a Democrat's lying not...it's outrageous?

Again, I said NO.

zachs · Mar 30, 2004, 08:23 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
So if you don't say something either way, do I just assume the worst?

No, you ask me to clarify. Just like I asked you.