[Tater Salad]

Just as much of a surprise as the muslim terror funding, Socialists have no embraced Kerry as their candidate. Here's the NewsMax article:
"We've already reported how Communist Party USA has endorsed John Kerry for president, and now we're pleased to note that Democratic Socialists (isn't that redundant?) of America has chimed in as well.

"Kerry was hardly the first choice of our members. Most supported Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean in the Democratic primary elections and would be very critical of Senator Kerry's voting record on trade issues, as well as his support for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq; but the most important concern of our members now is to defeat Bush," said Frank Llewellyn, the socialists' national director.

What? They've now concluded that Kucinich can't bag the nomination?

With friends such as these, Kerry won't need any enemies."

If Socialists embrace Dean, and the members here are a step left of that, then I guess you might see why most of you fall under the "Marx Baby" category.

Democratic Socialists
Communist Party
NewsMax

Also wanted to point out that on the CPUSA website, they show a number of products to BUY that they are SELLING. Sounds like capitalism.

[Logic]

OMFG!!! Run to the hills!!! Grab your Smith&Wesson's!!! TEH COMMUNISTS ARE TAKING OVER!?!!!!





so?

[typoon]

Originally posted by Tater Salad:
Just as much of a surprise as the muslim terror funding, Socialists have no embraced Kerry as their candidate. Here's the NewsMax article:
"We've already reported how Communist Party USA has endorsed John Kerry for president, and now we're pleased to note that Democratic Socialists (isn't that redundant?) of America has chimed in as well.

"Kerry was hardly the first choice of our members. Most supported Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean in the Democratic primary elections and would be very critical of Senator Kerry's voting record on trade issues, as well as his support for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq; but the most important concern of our members now is to defeat Bush," said Frank Llewellyn, the socialists' national director.

What? They've now concluded that Kucinich can't bag the nomination?

With friends such as these, Kerry won't need any enemies."

If Socialists embrace Dean, and the members here are a step left of that, then I guess you might see why most of you fall under the "Marx Baby" category.

Democratic Socialists
Communist Party
NewsMax

Also wanted to point out that on the CPUSA website, they show a number of products to BUY that they are SELLING. Sounds like capitalism.

This surprises you?

[Spheric Harlot]

Dude, EVERYBODY who's not right-wing, and even a lot of disgruntled right-wingers, are endorsing Kerry - purely for lack of more reasonable alternatives.

Trying to twist communists' and socialists' preference for a certain candidate into a valid reason not to vote for him is the saddest pro-Bush argument yet and smacks of applied McCarthyism.

Congratulations.

-s*

[Krusty]

The explanation of this is in the quote in your very own post

"Kerry was hardly the first choice of our members. Most supported Dennis Kucinich or Howard Dean in the Democratic primary elections and would be very critical of Senator Kerry's voting record on trade issues, as well as his support for the resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq; but the most important concern of our members now is to defeat Bush,"

Pretty straight forward, I think. I'm sure there are some true neo-fascist, ultra right wingers that will vote for Bush even though he's not as conservative as they would like.

[typoon]

Originally posted by Spheric Harlot:
Dude, EVERYBODY who's not right-wing, and even a lot of disgruntled right-wingers, are endorsing Kerry - purely for lack of more reasonable alternatives.

Trying to twist communists' and socialists' preference for a certain candidate into a valid reason not to vote for him is the saddest pro-Bush argument yet and smacks of applied McCarthyism.

Congratulations.

-s*

Really? which disgruntled right-wingers?

[dcolton]

Originally posted by typoon:
Really? which disgruntled right-wingers?

DOn't waste your time.

[vmpaul]

What's the big deal here? So there are socialists for Kerry?

There are also right-wingers who or stumping for, and donating to Nader's campaign. It's a strange world.

[Agasthya]

Yeah, and racists like Trent Lott are backing George Bush's campaign.

[Tater Salad]

Nazis aren't far right.
If these people were so independent from mere socialists, why don't they endorse Nader. He's a nutcase. Or maybe try to get an independent ticket. That might work on the west.
If John Kerry is a neo-con to the marxists, then why don't they say "both candidates suck ass, and we will not support either of these neo-cons in this election in protest to the lack of more progressive minds." Sounds fine to me.
And that McCarthy argument is old. Many of them were communists. And believe it or not, the ideology is a threat to this country. History shows us that.

[Edit]: I'd give money to Nader. More votes for the lesser of two evils.

[typoon]

Originally posted by Agasthya:
Yeah, and racists like Trent Lott are backing George Bush's campaign.

And you have a KNOWN former member of the KKK Supporting Kerry in Robert KKK Byrd.

[Tater Salad]

Good point. And Bush called Trent's comments offensive:
CNN

[Agasthya]

Originally posted by Tater Salad:
Good point. And Bush called Trent's comments offensive:
CNN

As opposed to not saying anything and getting killed in the polls? Hell, even Lott apologized and he made the comments in the first place so we know that he meant what he said! It is all political maneuvering.

[Agasthya]

Originally posted by Tater Salad:
Nazis aren't far right.

Yes they are.

[Tater Salad]

Killed in the polls? Looks even to me. Or are talking about Lott?
If those statements work for the loca leaders of the People's Republic, that why not Bush?

[Agasthya]

Originally posted by Tater Salad:
Killed in the polls? Looks even to me. Or are talking about Lott?
If those statements work for the loca leaders of the People's Republic, that why not Bush?

No. I was talking about Bush condemning Lott's remarks. If he hadn't, then he would have been guiltly through association because Trent Lott was one of the leaders of the party that he was representing in the White House. It was a no-brainer to say that Lott was wrong.

[Tater Salad]

Guilt by association? Wouldn't every senator need to apologize too, since that is more relavanet, considering the White House is not in the same btanch as offender? I didn't hear the liberal Senator Arlen Specter. Is he a rascist?

[Saad]

The Falangists have endorsed George W. Bush. The actions of thrid parties are hardly relevant.

[Tater Salad]

Good for them. I'm not sure anyone has ever heard of them.
There is astigma to the word communist you people don't like, and most people don't like communism. The 10 reasons to hate Bush flyer sounds like John Kerry talking. Also sounds like all of you. It's not just the party thing, it's that the ideology likes it.

[Edit] Who is this?
The [Blank] came about because our founding members were dissatisfied with their political options. No single party addressed every necessary issue, or the fact that all of the most important issues come down to a single conflict of belief.

Our goal is to avoid becoming talking heads like mainstream politicians, but simultaneously to eschew the kind of marginalization embraced by many of the less-stable in the Nationalist movement. Further, we want to strip away unnecessary emotion, both "love" and "hate," to create a rational platform which upholds Traditional values.

Our members are professionals with whom you may interact on a daily basis. We went to your highest learning institutions, studied your greatest thinkers, and are comfortable navigating and succeeding in your society. However, we disagree with the fundamental principles of globalism and internationalism, so when we broke with liberal ideologies we used Green and Libertarian ideas to accent forgotten tenets of Nationalism.

The mission of the [Blank] is to make healthy changes to a sick system, using ancient principles and modern politics. While globalism and egalitarianism and internationalism embrace a vision which is against nature and Tradition, we turn instead to time-proven methods of government but give them a modern voice.

[Spheric Harlot]

Originally posted by typoon:
Really? which disgruntled right-wingers?

I meant "disgruntled, traditionally Republican voters".

Simey is just the first staunch Republican who comes to mind as having considered "switching". Not all have prioritize international policy issues in their decision, obviously.

-s*

[Spheric Harlot]

Originally posted by dcolton:
DOn't waste your time.

shouldn't you be baking mudcakes somewhere?

[MindFad]

I am pointing and laugh at ghost_fl—I mean, tater salad—on the Internet.

[y0y0]

Originally posted by Tater Salad:
Nazis aren't far right.
...

Tell that to all the Jews, Gypsies, Homosexuals, Poles, Russians, French, Czechs, Yugolsavians and Ukranians that they killed.

[dcolton]

Originally posted by Spheric Harlot:
shouldn't you be baking mudcakes somewhere?

...