 |
 |
Clinton Sets Sights On Secretary-General
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Interstellar Overdrive
Status:
Offline
|
|
Interest!Alert
WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- Former U.S. President Bill Clinton has set his sights on becoming U.N. secretary-general. A Clinton insider and a senior U.N. source have told United Press International the 56-year-old former president would like to be named leader of the world body when Kofi Annan's term ends early in 2006.
"He definitely wants to do it," the Clinton insider said this week.
A Clinton candidacy is likely to receive overwhelming support from U.N. member states, particularly the Third World. Diplomats in Washington say Clinton would galvanize the United Nations and give an enormous boost to its prestige. But the former president's hopes hang on a crucial question that will not be addressed until after the presidential elections: can he get the support of the U.S. government -- a prerequisite for nomination?
The political wisdom is that a second George W. Bush presidency would cut him off at the pass. The notion of Clinton looming large in the international arena from "the glass tower" in New York would be intolerable to the Bush White House. If Democratic candidate, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., wins on Nov. 2 the prospect of Clinton as secretary-general won't exactly be welcome either, but Kerry would find it much harder -- if not impossible -- to go against it.
After a Middle East U.N. Secretary General (Boutros Boutros Ghali) and an African (Kofi Annan) it is generally considered Asia's turn to fill the post, U.N. experts say. No announcement has been made, but behind the scenes China is already pushing the candidacy of Thai Foreign Minister Surakiart Sathirathai, who also seems to have U.S. support. If Clinton does emerge as a candidate, however, China would most likely shift its support, the experts say.
No American has ever been U.N. secretary-general, but the United States is both host country to the United Nations and the major contributor to its budget. A hostile U.S. Congress held up its dues for years -- until the Clinton administration negotiated a payment plan for Washington's arrears. Clinton also revived U.S. membership of UNESCO though the Americans did not actually move back into their offices at the Paris-based scientific and cultural U.N. agency until after the start of the Bush presidency.
President Reagan had taken the United States out of UNESCO in protest against alleged corruption by former top agency officials.
Clinton is currently recovering from the heart bypass surgery he had to undergo last month, and this has kept him away from the Kerry campaign after a few initial support appearances. The former president has told friends and Kerry staffers he plans to resume campaigning for Kerry, but on a limited scale because his recovery has been gradual. He has talked of his interest in taking over at the United Nations since the publication of his commercially successful autobiography, which he recently said had sold 1.9 million copies. Writing the book kept him busy after leaving office in 2000, but he is now ready to channel his considerable political skills and energy into another role in public life.
There had been rumors that he would run the Third Way organization, the world Social Democratic movement he had talked of launching together with British Prime Minister Tony Blair and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. But the political alliance had come unstuck and the idea ran out of steam partly because Blair and Schroeder found themselves on opposite sides in the Bush-led Iraq war.
Putting Clinton in charge of the United Nations would be a real test of international intentions, observers say.
"Critics of the U.N. complain that it's an organization without the muscle and will to put its decisions into effect," the U.N. source observed. "There's a good chance that Clinton could significantly change that situation, and then we'll see if the critics mean what they say."
[Commentary] Personally, this is no surprise. While unfounded, my previous suspicion was similar to the report. Clinton has been doing alot with the UN, so to be honest, the only surprise here is that someone actually said it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CreepingDeath:
Interest!Alert
[Commentary] Personally, this is no surprise. While unfounded, my previous suspicion was similar to the report. Clinton has been doing alot with the UN, so to be honest, the only surprise here is that someone actually said it.
Ya know, I'm just not sure exactly how I feel about this story.
Having an American as UN Sec'y Gen'l might be good.
Having that American be Bill Clinton might be bad.
Having someone who could make the UN effective or even relevent in this increasingly dangerous world might be good.
Having that someone be Bill Clinton might be bad.
(HEAVEN FORBID) Having Hillary in the White House and Bill in the UN at the same time would be worse than comical, it would be bizarre!
|
|
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.
Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Interstellar Overdrive
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, I don't want to sound paranoid, but I don't think Bubba or Pumpkin Legs want Kerry to win. They're political geniuses, so I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary tries to get the nomination after Kerry loses…if they have their way.
As far as having Pumpkin Legs run in 08, there's good, and then there's bad. The good would be that Hillary is a nutcase socialist whom people feel iffy about. The bad news is that a prettyboy candidate than actually does something for the ticket, like balance it out, might be problematic for whoever the GOP tosses out in 08.
With Bubba and Gore doing stops for the scarecrow, one has to consider their records for their past help. Bubba's help in 2002 and with Davis in California both backfired, but it may not have been his doing. Who knows.
The thought of the Washington HillBilly's running to show erks me.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CreepingDeath:
Yeah, I don't want to sound paranoid, but I don't think Bubba or Pumpkin Legs want Kerry to win. They're political geniuses, so I wouldn't be surprised if Hillary tries to get the nomination after Kerry loses…if they have their way.
As far as having Pumpkin Legs run in 08, there's good, and then there's bad. The good would be that Hillary is a nutcase socialist whom people feel iffy about. The bad news is that a prettyboy candidate than actually does something for the ticket, like balance it out, might be problematic for whoever the GOP tosses out in 08.
With Bubba and Gore doing stops for the scarecrow, one has to consider their records for their past help. Bubba's help in 2002 and with Davis in California both backfired, but it may not have been his doing. Who knows.
The thought of the Washington HillBilly's running to show erks me.
It doesn't sound all that far-fetched. I've heard some speculation on the radio to that effect. It would help explain why HILL/BILL haven't gotten "whole hog" into campaigning for Kerry.
I won't go so far as to say that Bill faked his heart ailment (I wish him many years of good health and happiness) although there are SOME on these pages who, were the situation reversed, would strongly suspect (or even accuse) him of just that.
|
|
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.
Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've heard the secret wish for Kerry to be defeated theory as well. It would be bizzaro for members of the Democratic Party to wish their candidate defeat but stranger things have happened.
And no American will be secretary-general anytime soon.
|
|
Power Macintosh Dual G4
SGI Indigo2 6.5.21f
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|