[Logic]

I was wondering if we should keep all the election coverage in one thread? Then make it this one!

But the reason I posted this is because I was wondering when the first official numbers are released(not from some small villages in NH)? Anyone know?

Thanky!

edited to add: Please ignore Randmans personal attack on me in this thread so we stay on topic. Thanks

[effgee]

• "November 2, 2004 -- It's either going to be a long night or a Bush landslide if the first returns from two New Hampshire communities early today are any indication.
  
  President Bush and John Kerry each had 15 votes when the results were reported from the tiny hamlet of Harts Location shortly after midnight. Ralph Nader had one vote.
  
  When the votes came in from Dixville Notch, Bush had bested Kerry by a 19-to-7 margin. Nader came up empty in the town.
  
  The two communities have engaged in the one-minute-after-midnight Election Day tradition on-and-off since 1948 thanks to a state law that allows towns to close their polls once all the registered voters have cast ballots."

Bad news? Not really ... compared to 2000 ...

Code:
Harts Location
2004:	Kerry 15      Bush 15
2000:	Gore 13       Bush 17

Dixville Notch
2004:	Kerry 7       Bush 19
2000:	Gore 5        Bush 21

we'll see.

[Randman]

The biggest anti-American on this board should not be commenting on the election, much less creatings threads about it.

[voodoo]

0000 GMT 3 November - polls close in eight states

0100 GMT - polls close in 17 states plus DC

0200 GMT - polls close in 15 states

0300 GMT - polls close in four states

0400 GMT - polls close in five states

0500-0600 GMT - polls close in one state

GMT IS:

• Five hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time

• Six hours ahead of Central Time

• Seven hours ahead of Mountain Time

• Eight hours ahead of Pacific Time

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3760822.stm

[badidea]

Originally posted by Randman:
The biggest anti-Bush on this board should not be commenting on the election, much less creatings threads about it.

...and why shouldn't he?

[Saad]

Originally posted by Randman:
The biggest anti-American on this board should not be commenting on the election, much less creatings threads about it.

Logic's opinion is invalid because of where he lives?

[Randman]

Originally posted by Saad:
Logic's opinion is invalid because of where he lives?

No. because of the crap he writes.

[Saad]

Originally posted by Randman:
No. because of the crap he writes.

He represents his progressive views accurately, so he has no valid opinion?

[badidea]

Originally posted by Randman:
No. because of the crap I write.

[icruise]

This is pretty pathetic guys. We can't even agree on a thread in which to discuss the election? Does not bode well.

[mr. natural]

Well, that makes it official, this is the election thread for me!

Randyman is just pissed cuz his boy Dubya is in for a good ol' licking and he knows it.

Yup, it's a new and beautiful day here in America, and I'll be waltzing downtown to cast my vote soon.

See ya later all.

BTW, don't waste your day hanging round here. Go outside, take in the fresh air, make love
in a public place, or a private one, but whatever, just have fun and relax. The results won't be in for awhile but when they do come in it'll be really Good News!

[vmarks]

Create a new thread. Keep it clean of the idiocy from all sides, Logic and Randman.

None of this insulting "fixing" other people's posts, none of the pictures insinuating anyone who doesn't share your opinion possesses the intellect of an infant, none of it.

Knock it off, and keep it clean in the new thread, which I will create.