Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > CA food police seek to ban french fries...

CA food police seek to ban french fries...
Thread Tools
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 28, 2005, 03:14 PM
 
California files french fry lawsuit

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/08/27/fr...eut/index.html

SAN FRANCISCO, California (Reuters) -- California Attorney General Bill Lockyer has filed a lawsuit to force top makers of potato chips and french fries to warn consumers about a potential cancer-causing chemical found in the popular snacks.

In a complaint filed Friday in Los Angeles Superior Court, Lockyer sought an injunction to stop restaurant chains such as McDonald's Corp. and Wendy's International Inc. from selling french fries without some form of warning.

Also named were producers of potato chips and other packaged potato products like PepsiCo's Frito-Lay Inc. and Procter & Gamble Co., makers of Pringles chips.

The suit asks manufacturers of these products to identify the dangers of high levels of acrylamide, a chemical that studies have found is created when starchy foods are cooked at high heat.

"I know from personal experience that, while these snacks may not be a necessary part of a healthy diet, they sure taste good," Lockyer said in a statement. "But I, and all consumers, should have the information we need to make informed decisions about the food we eat."

The lawsuit alleges that companies have violated a state law passed in 1986 requiring companies to provide warnings before exposing people to known carcinogens or reproductive toxins.

In 2002, scientists found potatoes and other starchy foods cooked at high temperatures contained low levels of acrylamide. Other studies have discounted the potential toxicity of acrylamide to humans.

Acrylamide study

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is studying the impact of acrylamide levels in food. In a March press release, the FDA said "acrylamide can cause cancer in laboratory animals at high doses, although it is not clear whether it causes cancer in humans at the much lower levels found in food."

Acrylamide is also widely used for industrial purposes, including sewage treatment.

Other defendants named in the suit include Burger King Corp., KFC Corp., a unit of Yum Brands Inc., for its KFC Potato Wedges, Kettle Foods Inc., makers of Kettle chips, which bills itself as a natural health food brand, and Cape Cod Potato Chips Co. of Hyannis, Massachusetts, a unit of Lance Inc.

In June, a California consumer group pressed the attorney general's office to take this action. At that time, Frito-Lay issued a statement saying its "food safety standards are very stringent and meet all federal and state regulations."

Procter & Gamble spokeswoman Kay Puryear said company researchers have been investigating issues raised by the 2002 acrylamide study, she said.

"Acrylamide is available whether those foods are prepared in a restaurant, at home or by the packaged goods industry," she said. "We stand behind, and absolutely think, our products are as safe as ever."

Burger King spokeswoman Edna Johnson said she had not seen the suit because her company's Miami headquarters had been closed in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. "As a matter of company policy we don't comment on pending legal matters," she said.

Spokesmen for McDonald's, Wendy's, Kentucky Fried Chicken, Cape Cod Potato Chips, Yum Brands and Kettle Foods were not immediately available to comment Saturday.

Under state law, the attorney general's suit supersedes private claims filed by environmental groups in recent years against some of the same defendants.
     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 12:07 PM
 
Rule# 8 ALERT

Tell us what you think about this, please.
One should never stop striving for clarity of thought and precision of expression.
I would prefer my humanity sullied with the tarnish of science rather than the gloss of religion.
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 12:35 PM
 
It looks as though the lawsuit is pushing for a consumer warning, not a total ban.

That said, it clearly is biased against fast food and chip makers, when in fact all foods based on cooked potatoes can have the chemical being warned against here. If they were truly unbiased they would be suing potato growers.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: We come from the land of the ice and snow...
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 12:57 PM
 
If the chemical can be created by me in my home, by frying up hash browns, and not by some special process McDs or Frito Lay does to their chips, then this is silly. Should be a warning to the public, an advisory, and a good chart on how many chips you'd have to eat to reach toxicity levels.

     
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 12:59 PM
 
Acrylamide is generated in all starch containing foods that are heated beyond 160° C in the absence of water. It is not limited to potatoes.
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 02:08 PM
 
Originally Posted by dcmacdaddy
Rule# 8 ALERT

Tell us what you think about this, please.
you ARE a bureaucrat aren't you!

LOL

me? my personal opinion? its more of the same, government telling others how to live their lives. The warning is just the first step... this could be construed as giving legal basis to claims against someone who makes french fries.... a step towards banning them similar to cigarettes.

Of course this entire issue is patently absurd, but such is life.

     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 03:05 PM
 
Oh, banning them like cigarettes, you say?

You might have used an actually banned substance as an example. Cigarettes are legal and will remain so for the foreseeable future because nobody is going to go against the tobacco industry.

Originally Posted by andi*pandi
If the chemical can be created by me in my home, by frying up hash browns, and not by some special process McDs or Frito Lay does to their chips, then this is silly.
You can create all sorts of dangerous substances in your home. Should McDonald's not have to warn people if they're using rotten meat because they don't bother to refrigerate? You can make rotten meat at home.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: We come from the land of the ice and snow...
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 03:22 PM
 
Yum!
     
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 03:38 PM
 
Muy yum. (Far be it from me to pass up a good palindrome.)
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: We come from the land of the ice and snow...
Status: Online
Reply With Quote
Aug 29, 2005, 03:44 PM
 
anyway, the point being that this is less like home-grown trichanosis, and more like suddenly discovering that boiling water makes it slightly toxic.

Hm, oh wait, I've heard someone say they don't like grilled food because of the burnt pieces being carcinogenic...

Is the raw food movement making progress?

(I'm just being silly and I know it.)
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 31, 2005, 02:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Oh, banning them like cigarettes, you say?

You might have used an actually banned substance as an example. Cigarettes are legal and will remain so for the foreseeable future because nobody is going to go against the tobacco industry.


You can create all sorts of dangerous substances in your home. Should McDonald's not have to warn people if they're using rotten meat because they don't bother to refrigerate? You can make rotten meat at home.

Stranger things can happen. Can't you make hot coffee at home, as well?

http://www.stellaawards.com/stella.html
"That Others May Live"
On the ISG: "The nation's capital hasn't seen such concentrated wisdom in one place since Paris Hilton dined alone at the Hooters on Connecticut Avenue." - John Podhoretz
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2