 |
 |
Musicians forced to use train instead of plane
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/4784225.stm
 bad news for me as well here in the US. i have two horns, one i usually do a check in with, the other the one in my signature which i usually do a carry on for.  i guess i have to post my horn, gahh
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Did they consider an automobile?
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
My understanding is that the worst restrictions -- i.e. no carry-ons at all -- are only in the U.K. airports right now. If you're only flying in the U.S., you ought to give your airline a call, and see whether your instruments are OK for carry-on. They might very well be, although with all the liquid restrictions, you may have to make sure all the spit is cleaned out before you board! 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Don't worry about it Brass. It's only a euphonium, so it's not like you can do shred-fu on it, so it's not like anyone's gonna miss it.
|
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Mar 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
(Last edited by porieux; Oct 2, 2006 at 04:45 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Since bathwater is no longer allowed in carry-on...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Second star to the right, and straight on till morning
Status:
Offline
|
|
Charter a plane.
That's why I have a job.
|
|
All men are created equal, but what they do after that point puts them on a sliding scale.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
i called the ap, and was told that since Logan is an X airport, the no carry ons thing is in effect.  until further notice
edit:
http://www.massport.com/about/press_news_airpor3.html
News
Boston Logan International Airport Security Advisory
August 11, 2006
In response to events in the United Kingdom, the Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) advises travelers of the following Transportation Security Administration (TSA) changes to airport screening procedures at Boston Logan International Airport for commercial U.S. carriers and on all flights into the U.S:
“PASSENGERS MAY NOT HAVE LIQUIDS OR GELS OF ANY SIZE AT THE SCREENING CHECKPOINT OR IN THE CABIN OF THE AIRCRAFT. THIS LIST INCLUDES: Beverages, Shampoo, Suntan Lotion, Creams, Toothpaste, Hair Gels, and other items of similar consistency. Such items may be transported in checked baggage”
“PASSENGERS MAY HAVE: Baby formula, breast milk, or juice if a baby or small child is traveling. Prescription medicine with a name that matches the passenger’s ticket. Insulin, and essential other non-prescription medicines”
Before leaving for the airport, travelers are advised to check with their airlines and to allow for additional time at the security check points.
For more information about the Transportation Security Administration, click here.
edit 2:  in other news
http://tsa-7.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ts...mp;p_topview=1
(Last edited by brassplayersrock²; Aug 11, 2006 at 03:55 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
