 |
 |
Dems Finally Admitting They're Commies?
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is hilarious to me: more and more Dems are coming out using the phrase "for the common good" to describe their positions and values. Common Good. It fits perfectly with their desire to make everyone an equal lemming, and it's funny to us that have always called Libs and (most) Dems "commies" for fun.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/10/16/D8KPTQSG1.html
I guess I'll have to start giving more of my disproportionally high income to the people who don't have the gumption or motivation I do once Big Brother gets into office in 2008. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah I know I've heard a similar phrase used elsewhere before
We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
What's that have to do with anything? I'll tell you how I promote the general welfare: I tell lazy-arse hand-out-wanters to get a frakking job.
WELFARE PROMOTED.
Next!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The point is that you're opposed to what you think Democrats mean when they say it, that's all.
(Last edited by itai195; Oct 16, 2006 at 04:34 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Your post is pointless. I plainly said Dems are starting to use a phrase that hits home to their communist leanings. Nothing meaningless there.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
NO YOUR POST IS POINTLESS
What does it mean when Republicans use the phrase?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
What's that have to do with anything? I'll tell you how I promote the general welfare: I tell lazy-arse hand-out-wanters to get a frakking job.
WELFARE PROMOTED.
Next!
"General welfare" and "common good" are more or less synonymous.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
(Last edited by Wiskedjak; Oct 16, 2006 at 04:47 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status:
Offline
|
|
"Common Good" is a communist phrase?  Is that because they both begin with comm?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
This is hilarious to me: more and more Dems are coming out using the phrase "for the common good" to describe their positions and values.
This is hilarious to me: a rambling forum post about a common expression used by all political stripes, not just communists.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, see, the difference is that Republicans aren't commies... duh! 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by BRussell
"Common Good" is a communist phrase?  Is that because they both begin with comm?
Next thing, he'll accuse the Bible of being communist for stealing Karl Marx's phrase "from each according to ability, to each according to need." 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
I'll tell you how I promote the general welfare: I tell lazy-arse hand-out-wanters to get a frakking job.
Will you do that before or after kicking puppies?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, it was a silly post, but we've all done it before. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cairo
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: München, Deutschland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
This is hilarious to me: more and more Dems are coming out using the phrase "for the common good" to describe their positions and values. Common Good. It fits perfectly with their desire to make everyone an equal lemming, and it's funny to us that have always called Libs and (most) Dems "commies" for fun.
You only approve the typical prejudice that Americans have no clue what certain political terms, like e.g. "communism" actually mean. And even better you so openly admit that?! Now that's hilarious. 
|
|
Aut Caesar aut nihil.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by BRussell
OK, it was a silly post, but we've all done it before.
not me. 
|
|
ebuddy
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Regardless of the ad-hominems RAIL made a point. Hillary often makes statements about things she knows America wont go for by calling it "The common good for the people"
That usually means raising taxes so the left can give your money you've worked for, to people that sit around there house and do nothing.
Do you know how many people I know that are on disability that have nothing wrong with them?
Atleast people aren't getting payed to be drunks like they were a few years ago. (Back a few years ago you could claim disability for being a drunk, and get payed to sit home and drink all day)
Of course, this was just something that was for the common good.
And it takes a village, and all those other buzzwords. I don't care who is doing it
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
"The common good" is a meaningless term that basically reduces to whatever the speaker wants plus a little clever wordplay to make other people think they'll benefit too, whether or not they actually will. Politicians have been using it since ancient times.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why do Republicans hate the common good?
Antisocialists. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Millennium
"The common good" is a meaningless term that basically reduces to whatever the speaker wants plus a little clever wordplay to make other people think they'll benefit too, whether or not they actually will. Politicians have been using it since ancient times.
Yes but I was just referring to what the Left are using it for in the present tense.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Face Ache
Why do Republicans hate the common good?
Antisocialists.
I certainly don't hate the common good, I just rarely see it being adequately provided by the government. What's good for you may not be good for me and too often it is those in government who know the least of what is good for the rest of us.
Anti-social? Maybe. I find that I appreciate my dog more every day.
|
|
ebuddy
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
"It fits perfectly with their desire to make everyone an equal lemming"
Precisely why I don't side on politics or religion. Both seem to have shared goals.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
The British Commonwealth was actually the first attempt at worldwide communism and it would be controlled through communication and commercialism, which would be very common and complete.
V
|
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hahaha. It's posts like this that brighten my day here on MacNN: staunch right-wing Christian conservative posts slightly incoherent, logically clueless post; people from all sides jump all over the painfully obvious flaws in his reasoning; Kevin joins in to defend said staunch right-wing Christian because, after all, she/he is a staunch right-wing Christian.
It's all downhill after this.
greg
|
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: :ИOITAↃO⅃
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, good times, good times. *sniff* Times like these really makes me grateful for you guys, ya know?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Annals of MacNN History
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
Do you know how many people I know that are on disability that have nothing wrong with them?
What kind of disability? Because Social Security is pretty hard to get, actually.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: The Rockies
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ebuddy
not me.
Ha!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
You guys are hilarious. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Has anybody here seen my left shoe?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Annals of MacNN History
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakar²
Check your left foot.
I heard it was pretty good.
V
|
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: back home
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
Your post is pointless. I plainly said Dems are starting to use a phrase that hits home to their communist leanings. Nothing meaningless there.
Let's just say 40% of the U.S. is communist, so what. What does it changed in your life?
France had elected a communist government at one point and so what, life continued as it always was.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
boy people are getting desperate...try again
|
The rich are cheap. That's how they got rich.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
Your post is pointless. I plainly said Dems are starting to use a phrase that hits home to their communist leanings. Nothing meaningless there.
And what does it mean when Republicans use the same term?
"the secret to America's success was our talent for bringing people together for the common good and our willingness to serve a cause greater than self" sounds rather Communist, using your logic.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't know -- I'm a strong Bush supporter, but still don't follow how anyone could possibly be against the 'common good'? It is like saying you favor 'cut-and-run'ing. Are you a terrorist, RAILhead? You're starting to sound like one. If you're against the common good, I think you would have to be. Either that, or a Democrat, but then your post is all about how Democrats are for the common good (damn them). Maybe there is a Clinton angle I'm missing? If Clinton is for the common good, then I guess I'd have to be against it. It's too confusing.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tie
I don't know -- I'm a strong Bush supporter, but still don't follow how anyone could possibly be against the 'common good'? It is like saying you favor 'cut-and-run'ing. Are you a terrorist, RAILhead? You're starting to sound like one. If you're against the common good, I think you would have to be.
Exactly. Even slavery could be said to work for the common good, as long as you limit your viewpoint to exclude the slaves. And in the end, that's the problem with the phrase: the 'common good' cannot exist unless you limit your viewpoint to exclude those who don't benefit and those who pay for it one way or another. It helps that there's usually a lot of overlap between these two groups.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Millennium
Exactly. Even slavery could be said to work for the common good, as long as you limit your viewpoint to exclude the slaves. And in the end, that's the problem with the phrase: the 'common good' cannot exist unless you limit your viewpoint to exclude those who don't benefit and those who pay for it one way or another. It helps that there's usually a lot of overlap between these two groups.
Don't forget to include the embryos.
|
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you believe the government can help you - you're the definition of a loser.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by olePigeon
Don't forget to include the embryos.
You're the one saying it, not me.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Monique
France had elected a communist government at one point and so what, life continued as it always was.
France's government is structured in such a way that it's difficult to do much of anything at all, which is what enabled life to 'continue as it always was'. If you want an example of a more effective democratically-elected communist government, India has one.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Cupertino, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
India has an effective government?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spliffdaddy
If you believe the government can help you - you're the definition of a loser.
Depends. They can help you defend your country and protect your rights. That's basically their purpose.
V
|
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Millennium
Exactly. Even slavery could be said to work for the common good, as long as you limit your viewpoint to exclude the slaves. And in the end, that's the problem with the phrase: the 'common good' cannot exist unless you limit your viewpoint to exclude those who don't benefit and those who pay for it one way or another. It helps that there's usually a lot of overlap between these two groups.
Precisely! And slaves couldn't vote, either. Should gays be allowed to vote today? I think RAILhead might really be onto something here. If Bush is a communist, then should we still support the war in Iraq? Food for thought.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by itai195
India has an effective government?
Insofar as they can actually enact Communist policies, yeah. This is, for example, one of the major reasons that labor there is so cheap (at least by US standards): the Indian government actually has strict regulations keeping wages low.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|

|
|
 |
Forum Rules
|
 |
 |
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|