 |
 |
Could Winston Churchill Be Elected in America Today?
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Could Winston Churchill Be Elected in America Today?
BECK: All right. Welcome to "The Real Story".
CNN.com - Transcripts
I think not. That's the problem.
And yes, I know he was British. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
What I want to know is, why shouldn't we have "Could Hitler be elected in America today?" polls? Or how about Charles De Gaulle? OOooooo, or Mackenzie King, Canada's "greatest Prime Minister!" No, wait...COULD PINOCHET BE ELECTED IN AMERICA TODAY?
That is all. Good-night, my lovelies.
greg
|
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton 
What I want to know is, why shouldn't we have "Could Hitler be elected in America today?" polls? Or how about Charles De Gaulle? OOooooo, or Mackenzie King, Canada's "greatest Prime Minister!" No, wait...COULD PINOCHET BE ELECTED IN AMERICA TODAY?
That is all. Good-night, my lovelies.
greg
I'll leave those to you. Water tends to find it's own level.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Dumb poll. Didn't vote.
I wonder why you'd say that.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: missing
Status:
Offline
|
|
At least it would be worthy listening to such president and not to the moron we have in the White House.
|
|
-original iMac, TiPB 400, Cube, Macbook (black), iMac 24¨, plus the original iPod and a black nano 4GB-
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Annals of MacNN History
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wonder how often people would deride him as a drunk.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Probably not. For one thing, politics focuses much more on the private lives of the candidates nowadays (not that it isn't important, but it's way overrated), and Churchill would lose spectacularly on that basis.
|
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
No. He'd need nicer hair. Sad but true.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Annals of MacNN History
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
No. He'd need nicer hair. Sad but true.
I'd like to see him rock a faux-hawk.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Someone is working in Photoshop right now.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: London
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by marden
Could Winston Churchill Be Elected in America Today?
I think not. That's the problem.
He couldn't even get elected in Britain - in 1945!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
More to the point: Is there precedent for electing a dead man in America?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top
