Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Irony: Iran memo on leaking concerns leaked

Irony: Iran memo on leaking concerns leaked
Thread Tools
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2007, 02:37 PM
 
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070330/...7GsbeXlZHMWM0F

A confidential memo sent to the Internation Atomic Energy Agency, detailing Iran's concerns about previous leaks of confidential information, was leaked to the press today.

Generally, Iran is a little nutty, but it seems they were right on with this memo.
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Safe House
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2007, 04:52 PM
 
Originally Posted by goMac View Post
Iran: Attack fears spurred nuclear block - Yahoo! News

A confidential memo sent to the Internation Atomic Energy Agency, detailing Iran's concerns about previous leaks of confidential information, was leaked to the press today.

Generally, Iran is a little nutty, but it seems they were right on with this memo.
What's your point? They are not allowed to have a nuclear weapons program!
     
goMac  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 30, 2007, 08:18 PM
 
Originally Posted by Orion27 View Post
What's your point? They are not allowed to have a nuclear weapons program!
I didn't dispute that. I thought it was great that their concerns on leaks from the IAEA were validated by the memo they sent the IAEA being leaked.

Either that or Iranian security is bad and stuff is being leaked on their end.
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
     
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2007, 04:30 AM
 
Originally Posted by Orion27 View Post
What's your point? They are not allowed to have a nuclear weapons program!
Start
Indeed, but they are legitimately allowed to have a fully fuctional nuclear energy program including a full cycle of enrichment-capacity.

Espescially the US and Israel, but also other countries from the international community, don't trust Iran, that it would use the enrichment-capability simply for nuclear energy, but suspect it, it might secretly use its enrichment capabilities to enrich uranium up to weapon-grade-level and use it to produce nukes.

Therefore the US and Israel try to use the IAEA-organisation as well as the UN-security-council to force Iran to give up its enrichment-ambitions completely.

Iran insists though that it is their legal right to pursue enrichment for energy-purposes, go to start and return...

After you have read the above multiple times, and had enough of it, let's break out of the cycle and continue:
Iran also makes the point that other countries that are equally signators to the non-proliferation-act, like Japan and Southkorea, are allowed to have and use a full cycle of enrichment, without being sanctioned for or prevented from it.

For Iran it makes completely sense to develop a fully functional nuclear energy-program and facilities, including enrichment, as its capabilities to tap its own oil-ressources (although still vast) are in stark decline, and will soon reach a point, where the domestic need will equal or outweigh its capabilities to feed it.

The sanctions and embargoes the US has put upon Iran, espescially regarding replacement-parts for its american-built airplanes, has taught Iran to better pursue a technological autonomy, and the fully functional enrichment-cycle might serve as a first important as well as symbolic step.

It's also likely that Iran wants to reach the status where it is possible that they can have nukes, similar to Israel, so as to leave its neighbours and enemies in doubt if Iran actually has nukes or not, as a deterrence against regime-change-interventions.

In order to relieve suspicions, Iran has said that it would accept full observance and free inspections of the nuclear plants and enrichment-facilities by the IAEA, as long as Iran gets the guranteed right to enrich uranium to energy-useable-levels.

Taliesin
     
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Always within bluetooth range
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 31, 2007, 05:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by Orion27 View Post
What's your point? They are not allowed to have a nuclear weapons program!
As mentioned, Iran is part of the NPT and has gone by the book with its nuclear program. And, please assign some agency in your "They are not allowed" statement. Who doesn't allow them to have nukes? The same UN that the US has scorned and ignored for the last 5 years? That conservatives call corrupt and should be disbanded? Its pretty hypocritical to invoke the authority of an organization who's authority we dismiss when it suits us. If you expect Iran to follow the wishes of the security council, explain to me why we didn't have to when we bypassed the UN and invaded Iraq ?
     
   
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2011 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.7 © 2000-2011, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2